In this regard, the Panel
refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere
registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising
typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an
unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.” ...
2023-05-23 - Case Details
Moreover, the Panel also refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels
have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar
(particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous
or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.” ...
2022-11-08 - Case Details
Section 3.5 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 states that “[p]articularly with respect to ‘automatically’ generated pay-
per-click links, panels have held that a respondent cannot disclaim responsibility for content appearing on
the website associated with its domain name (nor would such links ipso facto vest the respondent with rights
or legitimate interests)”. ...
2022-11-02 - Case Details
As explained at section 3.1.4 of the WIPO
Overview 3.0: “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical
or confusingly similar to a famous or widely-known trade mark by an unaffiliated entity (particularly domain
names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) can by itself create a presumption
of bad faith”. ...
2023-02-06 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain
Name indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name
and reputation of the Complainant and its WHATSAPP Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan
Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s
actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for
commercial gain”). ...
2022-11-24 - Case Details
This would increase the cost for the Complainant, who has already paid for the present p...
- The Respondent has been involved in previous UDRP cases, in some of these cases, the panels decided that English should be the language of the proceeding.
...
2022-12-05 - Case Details
John Adem, WIPO Case No. D2000-1480; Gordon Sumner, p/k/a
Sting v. Michael Urvan, WIPO Case No. D2000-0596; The E.W. Scripps Company v. Sinologic Industries,
WIPO Case No. ...
2022-11-11 - Case Details
First, the Panel finds that the Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that
such registration and use has been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its JDE Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark”).
...
2022-12-27 - Case Details
Concretamente, la Demandante aporta los
certificados de registro de las siguientes marcas:
- Marca de la Unión Europea núm. 002310076, TILLOTTS, denominativa, registrada el 17 de septiembre de
2009 para las clases 5 y 42.
- Marca Suiza núm. P-494757, TILLOTTS, denominativa, registrada el 9 de julio de 2001 para las clases 5 y
42.
- Marca Internacional núm. 1055242, TILLOTTS, denominativa, registrada el 10 de septiembre de 2010 para
las clases 5, 42, y 45...
2024-04-24 - Case Details
See also O2 Worldwide Limited v. Domains
By Proxy, LLC / Rodrigo P Braga, Ypse IT Solutions, WIPO Case No. D2019-0124.
Based on the available record, the Panel finds the first element of the Policy has been established.
...
2024-04-22 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests
af f iliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide of fering of goods or services (Madonna
Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; AB Electrolux v.
Handi Sofian, Service Electrolux Lampung, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-12-15 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests
affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna
Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; AB Electrolux v.
Handi Sofian, Service Electrolux Lampung, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-12-08 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels have
consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2023-11-01 - Case Details
Article 22(2) of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 of April 28, 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration states that “[p]articipation in the ADR procedure shall be compulsory for the holder of a domain name”. In addition, section 15 of the Domain Name Registration Terms and Conditions for “.eu” domain names states that: “[t]he Registrant must participate in ADR Procedures if a third party (a ‘Complainant’), in compliance with the Dispute Resolution Rules, assents to an ADR Provider and initiates a complaint against the Registrant on the basis of speculative or abusive registration.”
...
2022-02-15 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration and use have been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its SPEEDY CASH Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2022-02-14 - Case Details
Founded in Springfield, Missouri, in December 1957, O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. is an American auto parts retailer that p...
Complainant owns a trademark registration for the FIRST CALL mark in the United States, with registration details as follows:
- FIRST CALL, United States Trademark Reg. ...
2022-03-24 - Case Details
case=D2016-0656
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-1107.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-0163.html
page 5
Second, the Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration
and use has been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant
and its SIGA Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case
No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional
effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark”).
...
2023-01-18 - Case Details
In addition, Respondent’s registration and use of the Domain Name indicate
that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation
of Complainant and its ISOSTAR mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2023-01-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is Almas CHP SA, a Swiss company operating in the field of seafood products and
services and owning several trademark registrations for CAVIAR HOUSE, among which:
- United States Trademark Registration No. 1468499 for CAVIAR HOUSE and design, in International
Class 29, registered on December 8, 1987;
- Swiss Trademark Registration No. P-379195 for CAVIAR HOUSE and design, in International Classes
29, 30, and 33, registered on November 6, 1990;
page 3
- International Trademark Registration No. 579034 for CAVIAR HOUSE and design, in International
Classes 29, 30, and 33, registered on November 12, 1991.
...
2022-08-16 - Case Details
The Complainant owns trademark registrations for SCHLOSSBERG, including Swiss mark CH P-365 027
(registered on July 27, 1988) and United States Registration No. 3268631 (filed on September 18, 2006 and
registered on July 24, 2007).
...
2022-08-15 - Case Details