The Panel will have to establish whether the Complainants’ case meets the requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. See LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung,
WIPO Case No. D2012-1233; Charabot SA v. Name Redacted,
WIPO Case No. D2018-0339.
...
2018-10-15 - Case Details
A gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to dispel confusing similarity with a trademark either. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-11-12 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use complainant's trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com, Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-09-12 - Case Details
Ravi Gurnani Gurnani,
Caso OMPI No. DES2006-0001; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2018-09-04 - Case Details
Ravi Gurnani Gurnani,
Caso OMPI No. DES2006-0001; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2018-05-28 - Case Details
The disputed domain names also contain the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix “.com” but a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-06-25 - Case Details
All disputed domain names also include the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix “.com” but a gTLD suffix does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between a domain name and a trademark for the purposes of the first element of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-14 - Case Details
Bad faith may be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that said use of the domain name by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains, LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-01-08 - Case Details
A party that wishes a change of language – in this case only the Response is in Dutch – should substantiate that it would be unreasonably onerous if the submission were to be in English (e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench,
WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052). The Respondent has motivated its request for a translation of the Complaint by stating that its command of English is insufficient to understand the Complaint. ...
2020-07-21 - Case Details
Prior panels have held that such registration and use of a domain that incorporates a complainant’s trademark to advertise and link to another commercial website to sell a complainant’s goods and/or the goods of a complainant’s competitors constitutes bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection Service by VALUE- DOMAIN / Kazuhiko Seki,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1080; BISSELL Homecare, Inc. v. ...
2019-05-27 - Case Details
In addition, the fact that the disputed domain name leads to sponsored links is likely to attract customers to the Respondent’s website and resulting in commercial gain for the Respondent (LEGO Juris A/S v. Moustafa Mahmoud,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2047).
Furthermore, by use of a domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, the Respondent is trading on the value established by the Complainant in its marks to attract Internet users and thereby deriving economic benefit from either those users attracted to the Respondent’s website or by receiving compensation from others if these would-be customers are routed elsewhere. ...
2019-05-24 - Case Details
A gTLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison between a domain name and a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-05-13 - Case Details
Bad faith may be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that said use of the domain name by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains, LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-03-02 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0644; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Charlie Carmichael,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1507). The Panel further notes that the nature of the disputed domain name carries a risk of implied affiliation (see section 2.5.1 of the WIPO Overview 3.0)
In the file there is no evidence of circumstances of the type specified in paragraph 4(c) of the Policy, or of any other circumstances, giving rise to rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name by Respondent.
...
2019-08-02 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain name (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich / Protection of Private Person,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
Furthermore, the Respondent has no right or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name resolving to an inactive website at the time of this decision (see, e.g., Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...
2021-03-04 - Case Details
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico,
WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-03-17 - Case Details
It is not necessary that the goods and/or services be identical for passing off to be found. [See, for example, the Lego Lemelstrich case 1983 FSR 155 and others].
6.7 Further, although this is not a case of trade mark infringement either, it is material to have regard to the criteria prescribed by the European Court of Justice in its recent decisions. ...
2000-07-07 - Case Details
Incorporation of the SWAROVSKI marks in the Domain Name without any reasonable justification is sufficient evidence of bad faith by the Respondent. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2012-07-26 - Case Details
Technology Services Ltd., WIPO Zaaknr. DNL2008-0002; en LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench, WIPO Zaaknr.
DNL2009-0052). Indien Eiser hieraan voldoet, rust de bewijslast op Verweerder om aan te tonen dat zij wel
een recht heeft op of legitiem belang bij de onderhavige domeinnaam.
...
2026-04-24 - Case Details
Nall’'s Silks Sari Centre, WIPO Case No. D2009-0664;
LEGO Juris A/S v. Milon Khan, hongbaocomau, WIPO Case No. D2024-5240.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2026-01-29 - Case Details