the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was f iled in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on
September 27, 2023. ...Moreover, the Panel notes the composition of the disputed domain name carries a risk of implied af f iliation
(see WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.5.1). The additional term “of f icial” directly refers to the common
expression of “operated by the owner directly”, which actually increases the likelihood of confusion.
...
2023-12-14 - Case Details
The Complainant has over 4,800 employees, with its primary of f ices in San Diego, California; Fort Mill,
South Carolina; Boston, Massachusetts and Austin, Texas. ...The disputed domain name is also confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark LPL FINANCIAL, from
which it differs by the substitution of term “financial” with the visually, phonetically and semantically similar
term “f inancing”. In the Panel’s view, this variation does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity.
...
2023-12-13 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.2.1.
The Panel f inds the entirety of the Complainant’s mark EURONEXT is reproduced within the Disputed
Domain name. ...Although the addition of other terms, here “nl” may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-01-08 - Case Details
Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the Complainant’s trademark for the purposes of the Policy.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. ...In the present case, the Panel notes that the Complainant’s trademark registration predates the
Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name by more than 20 years. The Panel f inds that the
Complainant’s trademark PANALYTICAL is not a dictionary word. Noting the Complainant’s long use and
registration of its trademark and in the absence of a response f rom the Respondent, the Panel f inds on
balance that the Respondent knew or should have known of the Complainant’s trademark when registering
the disputed domain name, and intended to cause confusion between the Complainant and the Respondent.
...
2025-09-08 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
The Panel thus f inds that the Complainant has satisfied its burden of proof under Policy paragraph 4(a)(i).
...Upon review of the record, the Panel f inds
that both the registration and use of the disputed domain names by the Respondents constitute bad faith
under the Policy. ...
2025-09-03 - Case Details
In fact,
the Respondent must have had in mind intentionally registering the Complainant’s famous mark, expecting
that Internet users eventually searching for the Complainant’s services would come across the Respondent,
and should have known that by registering the disputed domain name, it was not only violating the
Complainant’s earlier rights, but also preventing the Complainant f rom ref lecting its mark in the
corresponding domain name.
Page 4
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name resolving previously to the Complaint f iling to an
error page does not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding.
...Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. D2000-0003.
The Panel f inds such behavior to constitute bad faith registration and use of the disputed domain name
under the Policy. ...
2025-08-18 - Case Details
Third, almost all the disputed domain names are being used in furtherance of a f raud and phishing scheme.
Specifically, the email addresses associated the disputed domain names are being used to impersonate
Aramco to send f raudulent emails that solicit money and personal information f rom vendors seeking
partnership opportunities with Aramco. ...The disputed domain name appears not to have been used to send f raudulent
emails but the domain name is included in the above-mentioned email f rom the Eighth Respondent.
...
2024-04-24 - Case Details
The Complainant has also applied
for various trademarks in BANYAN GROUP (e.g., Singapore trademark application number 40202306964Q,
f iled on March 29, 2023), applications f iled before the registration of the Domain Name.
The Domain Name was registered on April 10, 2023. ...Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. ...
2023-10-16 - Case Details
The Complainant also holds the domain name which resolves to its of f icial website.
The disputed domain name was registered on August 7, 2023.
The record shows that the disputed domain name resolves to a parking page named NameSilo and that the
disputed domain name was used to send f raudulent emails.
5. ...Furthermore, the nature of the disputed domain name, comprising the Complainant’s trademarks carries a
risk of implied af f iliation. See WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.5.1.
Therefore, the Panel f inds that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the
disputed domain name.
...
2023-10-30 - Case Details
Through its innovative platform, Qlik enables businesses to consolidate and visualize data f rom
various sources, facilitating intuitive data discovery and exploration.”
“The Complainant has a global presence with of f ices in North America, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Europe,
Middle East, Asia and Africa, and maintains a robust network of international partners.” […]
“Qlik's platform is designed to simplify the process of data discovery, exploration, and collaboration,
ultimately helping companies leverage their data to drive growth, improve ef f iciency, and achieve a
competitive advantage in their respective industries.”
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel f inds that Complainant has rights in the trademark QLIK through registration and use
demonstrated in the record. ...
2025-04-11 - Case Details
For example, Complainant has f iled an application for the word mark ORBUS, USPTO Serial No.
98408409, f iled on February 16, 2024, in connection with, among other things, “pharmaceutical preparations
for use in oncology and cancer treatment; human therapeutic preparations for use in oncology and cancer
treatment.”
...The Phishing Scheme involved contacting
individuals about a fake job posting at Complainant’s business via email. The email purports to come f rom
an employee in Human Resources at Complainant. The email is sent f rom ‘[…]@orbustherapeutic.com.’
...
2024-05-30 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name (including a blank page) would not prevent a f inding
of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.3. Having reviewed the
available record, the Panel considers more likely than not that the Respondent must have been aware of the
Complainant’s trademark, and notes the composition of the disputed domain name (noting that the term “fun”
is f requently used in entertainment and gambling), and f inds that in the circumstances of this case the
passive holding of the disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the Policy.
...
2025-08-25 - Case Details
Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Panels
have held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity (here, sending email, phishing, identity thef t, or
other types of f raud) constitutes bad faith. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.4.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. ...
2024-04-24 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...The disputed domain name was registered decades
af ter the f irst use of the Complainant’s trademark and almost 40 years af ter the registration of the
Complainant’s trademark.
...
2025-11-27 - Case Details
Cependant le
Requérant a soumis la Plainte en français et demande que cette dernière soit la langue de la procédure. Le
Requérant est une société f rançaise et son site Internet of f iciel n’est accessible qu’en f rançais. Or, le
Défendeur a su copier des éléments importants de ce site. ...case=D2020-3265
page 5
n’est pas indiquée, prenant en compte les f rais considérables que cela imposerait au Requérant. Les
Défendeurs, qui ont reçu les communications du Centre en f rançais et en anglais, n’ont pas pris position sur
ce point. ...
2023-10-20 - Case Details
WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the respondent may demonstrate rights
or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...The Panel f inds that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. Noting the status
of the MOUNJARO mark and the overall circumstances of this case, the Panel f inds it more likely than not
that Respondent knew or should have known Complainant’s MOUNJARO mark. ...
2025-04-28 - Case Details
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...The Panel f inds that
the Respondent has also engaged in a pattern of bad faith conduct under paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2025-06-05 - Case Details
Moulin Rouge Final Fantasy XIV”, creating a false impression of af f iliation or endorsement.
Several elements support the f inding that the website was misleading in nature, including the use of the
Complainant’s trademark to designate what was presented as a virtual nightclub within the Final Fantasy XIV
gaming environment. ...The Respondent incorporated the Complainant’s
trademark in its entirety, combined with “f fxiv”, to suggest an unauthorized extension of the brand into a
virtual space. Such actions are not coincidental but form part of a deliberate attempt to trade of f the
Complainant’s reputation and create a false sense of association. ...
2026-01-08 - Case Details
In 1970, students in 12 schools from 10 countries took the f irst of f icial IB exams. In 1994, middle years
programs were added. In 1997, primary years programs were added. ...Given this and having regard to the risk of implied af f iliation resulting f rom the correspondence of the
disputed domain name to the Complainant’s trademark, which is only reinforced by the “docs” string, the
Panel f inds that the Respondent cannot rely on paragraph 4(c)(iii) of the Policy either.
...
2024-01-17 - Case Details
The Complainant concludes that the
registration and use of the disputed domain name constitutes bad faith, whether or not the Respondent is
engaging in a personal feud or is a competitor of the Complainant, adding that it has f iled a criminal
complaint with the Berlin public prosecutor’s of f ice.
B. Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2024-08-05 - Case Details