The Respondent is Whois Agent of Kirkland, Washington, US / ICS INC. of Grand Cayman, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“UK”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Finally, the Complainant argues that the disputed domain name was registered and used by the Respondent in bad faith.
The Complainant requests that the disputed domain name be transferred to it.
...
2014-09-09 - Case Details
Respondent is Jessica Nelson, Geico, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-01-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, PTY LTD. ...Consequently, the Respondent holds no
legitimate and/or bona fide interest in the use of the disputed domain name, and it is evident that the
Respondent is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name, but instead,
aims at commercial gain by using the disputed domain name in a PPC campaign.
...
2023-09-12 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Such use of the disputed domain name could not be said to be bona fide.
In the oft-quoted case of Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. ...
2016-05-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is 1&1 Internet Limited of Gloucester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with 1&1 Internet AG (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See, e.g., Document Technologies, Inc. v. International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0270.
In the present case, the Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2017-04-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Evrard Therriault, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...Lundbeck A/S v. Evrard Therriault
Case No. D2024-1305
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-05-23 - Case Details
Respondent is Mike Powells, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2025-11-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andrew Mccubbins, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-11-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Chien-Wei Lee, Taiwan Province of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tochukwu Ogbuzuo, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-04-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Privacy Protect LLC PrivacyProtect org, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount-
Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is G Allison of Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc.
3. ...The Respondent contends he has acquired rights in the “Streetwise” mark by (i) his use of the mark to identify his services and products, (ii) his investment in marketing the services under the “Streetwise” name, and (iii) the customer's use and association of the mark to services provided by him.
The Respondent contends he has not registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith because (i) the Complainant and Respondent are not competitors, (ii) there is no evidence of customer confusion, and the Respondent would not benefit if there were, (iii) the Respondent has registered and utilized the disputed domain name solely to promote his own business, (iv) the “Streetwise” name and logo were being utilized three years prior to the registration of the disputed domain name, and (v) the Respondent has never sought to sell the disputed domain name to the Complainant or anyone else.
6. ...
2010-07-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Davis of Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This can, in some circumstances, be evidence of a bona fide offering of goods and services and thus constitute a legitimate interest in a domain name. Those circumstances have been set out in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-04-16 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-09-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the trade mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the trade mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-01-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is jiang cai fen, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: June 29, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Rakuten Group, Inc. v. jiang cai fen
Case No. D2023-2004
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History...
2023-07-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shen Zhen Shi Yang Cheng Biao Shi She Ji You Xian Gong Si of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-06-01 - Case Details
Respondent is slk dgvd, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-06-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is MOHAMMAD TAKI, Byte, Iraq.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-08-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Juan Carlos Caceres medina, Colombia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-10-03 - Case Details