The Respondent is Ana Velaz, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant has not authorized, licensed, or permitted the Respondent to register or use the Disputed Domain Name or to use the trademark in the Disputed Domain Name. Furthermore, the Respondent is not known by the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2020-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / maggi numi, United States
of America (hereinafter “United States or USA”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (‘the Domain Name’) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Further the Domain Name differs by only one letter from the domain name owned by the Complainant and,
therefore, appears to be a typosquatting registration. ...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
Respondent is xiao qi, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...Here, the disputed domain name is clearly based on Complainant’s SAFARILAND mark, albeit with the
non-distinguishing additional letter “j” at the tail of the disputed domain name. ...
2025-06-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Faisal Anwar, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The Respondent has never been authorized by the Complainant to register a domain name similar to its
trademark registrations or company name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain
name and has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...
2026-02-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Guiying Wu of Lishui, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Antonio Camberos of Coahuila, Mexico, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...At some point thereafter, the Respondent used the disputed domain name for a website headed as follows:
“TADASHIYANAI.COM. THIS DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.
Your path to world wide domination starts with a good domain name.”
...
2013-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ali Bing, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Wild West
Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In addition to this, the Panel considers the fact that for its official
(corporate) website the Complainant uses the domain name , and the Domain Name is
almost identical to the Complainant’s domain name.
...
2022-12-27 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...Confusing similarity has been found by other Panels in similar circumstances.
See, e.g., Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. Marcellod Russo,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1049 (WIPO November
22, 2001) (finding the domain name confusingly similar
to Complainant’s VOGUE mark); Yahoo! ...
2002-12-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Protect, LLC of Burlington, Massachusetts, United States / Jiang Gang, guanjiangfeng LLC of Onitsha, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Disputed Domain Name was registered on July 17, 2017. The Disputed Domain Name does not point to an active website.
5. ...
2017-11-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mark Roxberry, Drive Technology, LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Respondent also
asserts that Complainant is engaged in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
6. Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2023-07-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Armel Dupont, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is (i) confusingly similar to its earlier trademarks, (ii)
that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and (iii) that the
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2023-09-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is lin lin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web Commerce
Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on January 5, 2024. The Domain Name resolves to a website which
supposedly offers skincare, cosmetics and make-up products under the trademark CLARINS (the Domain
Name Website).
5. ...
2024-03-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is mon nehh, BiG, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Mark, that the Respondent
has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, and that the Respondent registered and
is using the Domain Name in bad faith.
...
2025-02-12 - Case Details
The only documented use of the disputed domain name is the two fraudulent emails sent on the same day the disputed domain name was registered.
5. ...By not submitting a response, the Respondent has failed to invoke some circumstance that might otherwise demonstrate, pursuant to paragraph 4(c) of the Policy, that Respondent holds some rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. Ahead Software AG v. Leduc Jean,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0323.
The Panel concludes that the Respondent has failed to establish some rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...
2018-08-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims the transfer of the disputed domain name on the grounds that:
- the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights;
- the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the disputed domain name; and
- the dispute domain name has been registered and used in bad faith.
...
2020-06-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Cassandra Italia, Intermedika Pte Ltd (now Solger Industry Pte. Ltd.), Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Coupled with the fact that the Disputed Domain Name is nearly the same as the Complainant’s domain name, this moreover suggests a sufficient reputation in the Complainant’s Trade Mark. ...
2019-06-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Tim Parsons, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with AE Domain Administration (.aeDA) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent, according to the WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of the United States who registered the disputed domain name on October 28, 2019. ...
2020-02-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Luigi Corsetti, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Soluciones Corporativas IP, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Furthermore, the disputed domain name was initially used to redirect Internet visitors from the domain name . This domain name was reassigned to the Complainant on December 21, 2020, following a “.it” ADR proceeding.
...
2021-08-03 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In cases where the disputed domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the disputed domain name, the disputed domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing.
...
2021-10-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Marcos Alonso, Spain.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be transferred to the Complainant.
/Knud Wallberg/
Knud Wallberg
Sole Panelist
Date: March 6, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
BioNTech SE v. ...
2023-03-07 - Case Details