The Respondent is Privacy Department, IceNetworks Ltd., Iceland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Internet Domain
Service BS Corp (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on June 1, 2023. There is no active web site associated with the Domain
Name. ...
2024-11-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is christian reinhardt, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Mat Bao Corporation
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xiamen Privacy Protection Service Co., Ltd., China/ Wang Su Qing (王素清), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eName Technology Co., Ltd. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, and has not made a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name; and
(c) The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2021-07-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Robert Spence, California, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. ...The Panel thus finds that the change of order of these terms in the Domain Name at issue does not render the Domain Name and the trademark dissimilar (see Société des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Etrangers à Monaco v. ...
2008-02-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC / John Stuart of Scottsdale, Arizona and Houston, Texas, United States of America, respectively.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...b) That the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
(c) That the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. ...
2012-05-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is mujiati karmila, Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-11-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bukola Olapade, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Whogohost
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The
Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization
from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2022-11-22 - Case Details
Respondent is Svetlana Kyriakidou, Amici IT Ltd, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Indeed, Complainant claims Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests to the Domain Name, and the
current use of the Domain Name demonstrates bad faith. Respondent is not commonly known by the name
“Chariso.” ...
2025-03-27 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Panel is therefore satisfied that the Complainant has made a prima facie showing of the Respondent's lack of rights or legitimate interest in the disputed Domain Name. Once a complainant has made this prima facie showing, the Respondent must come forward with evidence that rebuts this presumption (Document Technologies, Inc. v. ...
2009-10-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Robin Taylor of Frankfort, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Denis Kemp, Denis Kemp, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Tarkett GDL S.A. v. Denis Kemp, Denis Kemp
Case No. D2024-0587
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-04-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Derrick Hurst, aust, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. The Panel finds the mark is
recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly
similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-12-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jacky LORENZ, Israel.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
As stated in many decisions rendered under the Policy (e.g. Robert Ellenbogen v. Mike Pearson,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0001) both conditions, registration and use in bad faith, must be demonstrated; consequently, the Complainant must show that:
- the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent in bad faith, and
- the disputed domain name is being used by the Respondent in bad faith.
...
2021-07-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Jumpshot Domains LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-10-14 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on May 3, 2022. The disputed domain name resolves to a
website offering crypto currency services under the name “Equinor Inc”.
5. ...After a complainant has made a prima facie case, the burden of production shifts to the respondent to
present evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. See, e.g., Croatia Airlines
d.d. v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2003-0455.
...
2022-08-25 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name which is the subject of this Complaint is .
...The Panel is forced to conclude that the disputed domain name was not adopted in good faith, and therefore any offering of goods or services under the domain name cannot be considered to have been
bona fide.
...
2002-09-18 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is further practically identical to the Complainant’s domain name , which redirects to its official website.
...E. Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Paragraph 1 of the Rules states that Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (“RDNH”) means using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name.
...
2021-06-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muhammad Muhteshim Ghazali, Muhtesem Enterprise, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / ffundsmithequityfund
ffundsmithequityfund, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-06-09 - Case Details
Respondent is Reneg, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. .../Georges Nahitchevansky/
Georges Nahitchevansky
Sole Panelist
Date: December 27, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Reneg
Case No. D2023-4391
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-01-09 - Case Details