The Respondent is Henry Henry, Hana Spa and Wellness Sdn Bhd (1231734-M), Malaysia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2019-07-09 - Case Details
Respondent is Ralph Moran, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (hereinafter “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Nodine
Sole Panelist
Date: February 28, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Frankie Shop LLC v. Ralph Moran
Case No. D2025-0126
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-03-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hendra Hendra, P.T Asli Rancangan Indonesia, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.13.1.
While the disputed domain name consists of two common terms, the nature of the website at the disputed
domain name, including a close copy of the Complainant’s logo, shows that the Respondent registered the
disputed domain name with the purpose of illicitly targeting the Complainant. ...
2025-09-15 - Case Details
Respondent is Tammy P Bailey, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: November 11, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Reggio Register Company, LLC v. Tammy P Bailey
Case No. D2025-3879
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
5. ...
2025-11-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ahmed Syed, AdvertisingPulse, India (hereinafter, “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is
registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint (hereinafter, “the Complaint”)
satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or
“UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO
Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-03-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jennifer Kaiser of Bad Birnbach, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Visiotex S.A. with an address at 1250 Hallandale Blvd # 502, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33009, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is . The domain name registrar is Network Solutions, Inc.
3. ...On February 7, 2001, the Center verified that the Complaint satisfies the formal requirements of the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2001-03-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is IndiGO Networks of Nassau, Bahamas.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”), is registered with Wild West Domains, Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...“Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” is defined in paragraph 1(1) of the Rules as “using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name”.
...
2008-01-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Asad Qyoom, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc., (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Souter
Sole Panelist
Date: March 22, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Get Weird, LLC v. Asad Qyoom
Case No. DCO2024-0003
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-03-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It is well-established in decisions under the UDRP that the addition of non-distinctive and descriptive elements to an established trade mark is insufficient to avoid a finding of confusing similarity between the complainant’s trade mark and the disputed domain name (the decision in F. Porsche AG v. Glenn Stefan Karlsson-Springare,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1727 and many others). ...
2013-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michael Kennedy of Farnborough, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent’s web content, posted after the “cease and desist” letter had been sent, was designed to justify the Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name. See Sportingbet Plc, Internet Opportunity Entertainment (Sports) Limited v. Rough Media,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alan Hoshino, Bellevue, Washington, United States of America,
unrepresented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, is registered with Tucows,
Toronto, Canada.
3. ...Respondent points out that it registered
the disputed domain name in 1994 – when Complainant did not yet have a
website. Respondent also asserts that his use of the disputed domain name as
an e-mail address is a legitimate use under the precedent of Aspen Grove
Inc., v. ...
2006-04-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Volkan Turk of Istanbul, Turkey, and Doha, Qatar.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Register.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
It has been held in a number of cases that a genuine unilateral consent by the Respondent to a transfer of the disputed domain name provides a basis for an immediate order for transfer without consideration of the elements of paragraph 4(a) of the UDRP: see AXA SA v. ...
2011-03-10 - Case Details
The instances of bad faith set out in paragraph 4(b) of the Policy are examples only, intended to illustrate types of conduct which is caught by the Policy. See Do The Hustle, LLC v. Tropic Web,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0624.
The Complainant did not register its trademark until after the disputed domain name was transferred into the Respondent’s name. ...It has long been established since Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, that “passively” holding a disputed domain name where it has been registered in bad faith is use in bad faith for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2020-11-03 - Case Details
On June 12, 2000, Complainant forwarded a cease and desist letter to Respondent requesting, inter alia, transfer of the subject domain names to Complainant. Respondent has refused to respond to this letter or to cooperate with Complainant to resolve this domain name dispute.
Based on the above information, the Panel concludes that Respondent registered the subject domain names in bad faith as defined in Paragraph 4(b)(i) of the Policy. The circumstances make clear that Respondent registered the domain names for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registrations to Complainant for valuable consideration in excess of out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name.
...
2001-01-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In line with the opinion of numerous
UDRP panels before (Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. D2000-0003)
and section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0, the Panel believes that the non-use of a domain name does not
prevent a finding of bad faith use.
...
2022-12-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Raione Santos Reis, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...Following a formal complaint to the Registrar, the disputed domain name was suspended. At the time of the
Decision, the disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website.
5. ...
2025-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Burmann Boris, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name has
been inactive more than three years when the last publication on the disputed domain name was made
onMarch 3, 2021. ...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Clive Marshall, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the
“Registrar”).
3. .../Luca Barbero/
Luca Barbero
Sole Panelist
Date: July 27, 2022
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Fly Go Voyager SRL v. Clive Marshall
Case No. D2022-2162
The disputed domain name was registered on May 3, 1999, and is pointed to a website currently offering on sale the disputed domain name for USD 19,995.
...
2022-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is 帆 钱, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Christie
Sole Panelist
Date: March 23, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Skims Body, Inc. v. 帆 钱
Case No. D2023-0454
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-03-30 - Case Details