About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58508   document(s)s (0.102 sec)

Rows

<<  <  36361 - 36380  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1283 for posisoft.net html (9 KB)

The Respondent is Michael Kennedy of Farnborough, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent’s web content, posted after the “cease and desist” letter had been sent, was designed to justify the Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name. See Sportingbet Plc, Internet Opportunity Entertainment (Sports) Limited v. Rough Media, WIPO Case No. ...

2012-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0885 for drmartens1460sale.com html (9 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...It is well-established in decisions under the UDRP that the addition of non-distinctive and descriptive elements to an established trade mark is insufficient to avoid a finding of confusing similarity between the complainant’s trade mark and the disputed domain name (the decision in F. Porsche AG v. Glenn Stefan Karlsson-Springare, WIPO Case No. D2011-1727 and many others). ...

2013-07-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2024-0003 for officialantisocialsocialclub.co pdf (151 KB)

The Respondent is Asad Qyoom, Pakistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc., (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Souter Sole Panelist Date: March 22, 2024 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Get Weird, LLC v. Asad Qyoom Case No. DCO2024-0003 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0292 for bestcabinetstogo.com html (14 KB)

Respondent is WHOIS Agent of Kirkland, Washington, United States of America / Nachman Cheeman of Richardson, Texas, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with eNom, Inc. ...ii) Rights or legitimate interests Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name because Respondent has not commonly been known by the Domain Name, nor is Respondent making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name. ...

2018-05-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0701 for pncpark.com html (22 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name which is the subject of this Complaint is . ...The Panel is forced to conclude that the disputed domain name was not adopted in good faith, and therefore any offering of goods or services under the domain name cannot be considered to have been bona fide. ...

2002-09-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0055 for candobetter.com html (25 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...See Pfizer Inc v. The Magic Islands, WIPO Case No. D2003-0870). The Panel considers that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the CANIDOBETTER.COM mark for the following reasons: (i) CANIDOBETTER.COM is not descriptive of any product or service and has a high degree of inherent distinctiveness; (ii) The disputed domain name differs from the CANIDOBETTER.COM trademark in the omission of the letter “i” which has little verbal or visual effect on the distinctiveness of the service mark; (iii) The Respondent in fact accepts that the disputed domain name is “highly similar” to the Complainant’s domain name, and that the websites at these domain names have similar design layouts. ...

2011-03-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1382 for mercureshotels.com html (25 KB)

The Respondent is Song Zhi of Shanghai, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2012-10-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIO2021-0032 for zalo.io html (12 KB)

The Respondent is John Robb / Park.io Privacy, Privacy.cc, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with humbly, LLC d/b/a Park.io (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent does not own any trade mark relation to the disputed domain name. Nor is the Respondent commonly known by the disputed domain name. The holding page used for the disputed domain name does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...

2022-03-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0138 for bpcecapitals.com html (10 KB)

The Respondent is Anastasiya Nikolaeva, the Russian Federation. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Van Caenegem Sole Panelist Date: April 12, 2022 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION BPCE v. Anastasiya Nikolaeva Case No. D2022-0138 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2022-04-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4765 for estafeta.top pdf (139 KB)

Also, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, and the website associated to the disputed domain name was used to commit fraud and fishing activities before the disputed domain name led to an inactive page. ...DE C.V. v. NameSilo, LLC, Domain Administrator Case No. D2023-4765 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. ...

2024-01-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0896 for richmondaudi.com html (12 KB)

Customer 0132780534 of Toronto, Canada / Balticsea LLC of Kaliningrad, Russian Federation. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2018-06-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1253 for subsea7-uk.com html (12 KB)

The Respondent is Andrew Thomasson of Dupage, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2018-08-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3146 for anthropic.icu pdf (139 KB)

The Respondent is Lester Doyle, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-09-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2986 for mon-lycees.net pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Marion Douchard, France. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2025-09-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2134 for skandia.shop pdf (135 KB)

The Respondent is Kellan Rhodes, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Private Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-07-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-4410 for arcelormittal-sales.com pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Eric Philipson, Germany. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount- Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on October 25, 2024. The disputed domain name is inactive and does not resolve to any active page. 5. ...

2024-12-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2175 for comando-estafeta.com pdf (178 KB)

The Respondent is EEnrique Collado Fernandez, LV, Mexico. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...- The incorporation of the ESTAFETA trademarks in the disputed domain name is not a coincidence and the disputed domain name was used for illegal activities. B. ...

2025-08-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3587 for criticorelnc.com pdf (142 KB)

Respondent is Richah Solanki, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Reg. No. 7153521 is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name, and the CRITICORE Trademark is recognizable in the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-10-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2333 for nclexs.org pdf (157 KB)

Respondent is Leonard Nicky, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on June 7, 2024, with regards the disputed domain name and the domain name . On June 7, 2024, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name and the domain name . ...

2024-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2944 for korianincaringhands.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is Redacted For Privacy (DT), United States of America (“United States”) / Kumru Pinar, Turkey. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2021-01-18 - Case Details