page 3
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the f irst element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-01-03 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed
domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain names is confusingly similar to the PAYTM Trade Mark
and identical to the PAYTM INSURANCE Trade Mark.
page 4
B. ...
2022-08-01 - Case Details
In view of the above, the Panel determines that the disputed domain names shall be consolidated under this
proceeding in accordance with paragraphs 3(c) and 10(e) of the Rules.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has submitted sufficient evidence to demonstrate its registered rights in the SWIRE
trademark.
The SWIRE trademark is wholly reproduced in the disputed domain names.
A domain name is “identical or confusingly similar” to a trademark for the purposes of the Policy when the
domain name includes the trademark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of other terms in the
domain name (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2022-09-14 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade
Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered trademark rights in it CVS, CVS HEALTH, and
CVS/PHARMACY, and CVS Logo Marks (“CVS Marks”), and has shown that no other entity has rights in or
uses the CVS Marks. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-04-25 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel holds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the BPCE trademarks of
the Complainant.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondent has not replied to any of the contentions of the Complainant. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-04-22 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, and the disputed
domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Marks acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-04-19 - Case Details
Respondent
Respondent did not respond to Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the VIRGIN and VIRGIN MEDIA marks in view of its trademark registrations. ...The Panel further finds that the whole of the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the VIRGIN MEDIA mark as they incorporate the trademark fully and as the addition of the ".online" or the ".site" generic Top-Level Domain does nothing to ameliorate the entire reproduction of the VIRGIN MEDIA trademark.
...
2017-01-13 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...In all the circumstances, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2017-01-11 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...In all the circumstances, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration which incidentally predate the date of registration of the disputed domain name by several decades.
...
2016-10-14 - Case Details
In relation to those other matters, if any, the Panel does not have any jurisdiction or role in the determination of the disputes between the parties insofar as they do not bear on the registration and use of domain names in bad faith which are confusingly similar to another person's trademark. Whether those rights, if any, fall to be determined in the courts of Israel depends on a multitude of matters which the Panel has no information about. ...In those circumstances, the Panel is satisfied that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademarks.
In light of this, and the Respondent's asserted position, the Panel considers it is appropriate to order that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant, necessarily without prejudice to the parties' respective rights, if any, with respect to any other matters that they may be in dispute about.
6. ...
2016-09-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends as follows:
Identical or confusingly similar
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name other than the generic Top-Level Domain ("gTLD") ".com" and hyphen is identical to their French trademark MASCOTTE ASSURANCES and their domain name .
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name , other than the gTLD ".com" and hyphen, is identical to the Complainant's trademark MASCOTTE ASSURANCES.
...
2016-09-16 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its LIDL marks because it consists of Complainant’s mark in its entirety, with the top level domain “.irish.”
...Even if the generic top-level-domain (“gTLD”) “.irish” were taken into account when determining similarity, the disputed domain name would still be confusingly similar as “irish” is an indicator of origin or location. Consequently Internet users will expect to be a domain name related to Lidl’s business activities in Ireland.
...
2016-09-01 - Case Details
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Anthony Frangiosa, Installernet, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0412.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainants have strong rights in both FIREFOX and MOZILLA, as shown by the many years of continuous and extensive usage in commerce, as well as by the numerous trademark registrations in the United States and the European Union.
Complainants are also right when they argue that the disputed domain names, and , are confusingly similar to their marks. The mere addition of a TLD to a trademark or service mark does not differentiate the resulting domain name from the mark. ...
2016-07-21 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Marks acquired through use and registration.
...
2016-10-07 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark, containing its LEGO trademark in its entirety, with the mere addition of a descriptive or nondistinctive element, namely “hobbit”, together with the legally irrelevant “.com” indicator.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well established in decisions under the UDRP that the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) (e.g., “.com”, “.info”, “.net”, “.org”) may typically be considered irrelevant in assessing confusing similarity between a trademark and a disputed domain name. ...
2016-10-05 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, and the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith.
...In all the circumstances, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2016-11-18 - Case Details
The Complainant argues that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Domain Names incorporate the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety, in combination with the descriptive terms “casinobonus” and “freespins”. ...For the purpose of assessing confusing similarity under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, it is permissible for the Panel to ignore the generic Top-Level Domains “.com” and “.net”.
The Panel finds that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2017-07-05 - Case Details
As a result the Complainant says that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its PETPLAN mark.
The Complainant submits that the Respondent is not sponsored by or affiliated with the Complainant in any way, and has not given the Respondent permission to use the Complainant’s trade marks. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered trade mark rights for its PETPLAN mark as set out above. ...
2016-02-26 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a French word mark registration for FRANCE BILLET registered under number 94530821 on July 25, 1994. ...As a result the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s FRANCE BILLET mark and the Complaint succeeds under the first element of the Policy.
...
2015-11-20 - Case Details