A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is identical to a mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...However, as a technical part of a domain name, the TLD in this case is not relevant in determining whether the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s BBB trademark and is without legal significance and should be ignored. ...
2017-03-16 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its mark MICHELIN, for which it claims well-known character and reputation. The disputed domain name substantially imitates the Complainant’s mark, omitting only the letter “e”, which constitutes a practice commonly referred to as “typosquatting”. ...Accordingly, this Panelist finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. It substantially reproduces and incorporates substantially, as the most dominant element, the Complainant’s mark MICHELIN, followed by a generic term that refers to the Complainant’s main activity and products. ...
2017-04-24 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel finds that this single Complaint is properly brought against both of the disputed domain names, despite the fact that the registrant of record for each domain name is different.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
When the ccTLD identifier “.au” and the 2LD identifier “.com” are ignored (as is appropriate in this case), the disputed domain name consists solely of the Complainant’s registered trademark EUROGRAND. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondents are not a licensee of, or otherwise affiliated with, the Complainant, and have not been authorized by the Complainant to use either its EUROGRAND trademark or its WILLIAM HILL trademark. ...
2017-04-24 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant contends that it has numerous registrations of the SUNTRUST Marks and that its trademark registrations are valid and subsisting and serve as prima facie evidence of its ownership and the validity of the SUNTRUST Marks.
...Complainant further contends that the Disputed Domain Name is identical with and confusingly similar to the SUNTRUST Marks pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
Complainant alleges that the Disputed Domain Name contains the SUNTRUST PARK trademark in its entirety. ...
2017-10-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant argues that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its well-known TATA mark because it incorporates the mark in its entirety and adds the name of one of the Complainant’s affiliated companies. ...The Panel notes that the disposition of the Respondent’s trademark application appears in the official trademark database and, indeed, occurred before this proceeding commenced and should have been taken into account by the Respondent as well as the Complainant in their respective pleadings.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant indisputably holds TATA and TATA-formative trademarks in India, Israel, and other jurisdictions. ...
2017-08-18 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the trademark OOR WULLIE by virtue of its trademark registrations in the United Kingdom and Europe and, based on the evidence, has common law rights in the phrase “Oor Wullie Bucket Trail” for purposes of the Policy.
The Panel finds that Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s OOR WULLIE trademark. This is because the Complainant’s trademark is entirely subsumed within the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2017-11-02 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of trademark registrations consisting of the words "New European College" in association with figurative elements and the generic words "Munich" and "The Genuine Business School".
...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2017-07-28 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights. It states that the disputed domain name wholly incorporates its trademark MALL OF OMAN and is identical to that mark.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it has registered trademark rights for the mark MALL OF OMAN. ...
2018-09-25 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainants argue that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainants’ famous and registered marks MICHELIN and EUROMASTER because they contain these marks in their entirety.
...Upon considering the above, the Panel determines that English be the language of the proceeding.
6.2. Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the complainant to show that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights.
...
2018-03-19 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is both identical and confusingly similar to its CHATROULETTE trademark because it encompasses and captures the trademark in its entirety. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has provided convincing evidence of its rights in the CHATROULETTE trademark acquired through its ownership of the above trademark registrations and the goodwill acquired by the use of its CHATROULETTE mark in its online chat website business.
...
2018-03-16 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends as follows:
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the FREE PEOPLE trademark as the domain name incorporates the trademark in its entirety with the addition of the words “dress” and “sale”. ...For these reasons, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s FREE PEOPLE mark.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Complainant contends that Respondent has not registered any trademark for the term FREE PEOPLE and therefore, does not hold rights in the disputed domain name. ...
2018-03-13 - Case Details
The Complainant requests that the Domain Name be transferred to it on the following grounds:
(i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its PORSCHE trademarks.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it is the owner of numerous registered trademarks consisting of the term PORSCHE in numerous jurisdictions including Portugal.
...
2017-11-21 - Case Details
The Panel therefore admits the supplemental filing into the record.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical with, or confusingly similar to, the Complainant’s trademark rights.
There are two parts to this inquiry: the Complainant must demonstrate that it has rights in a trademark and, if so, the disputed domain name must be shown to be identical or confusingly similar to the trademark.
The Complainant has proven ownership of the registered trademarks identified in Section 4 above for the mark RISKMETHODS and segmented ball device.
...
2019-04-16 - Case Details
In addition, both the Complaint and the Response have been submitted in English.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark rights.
There are two parts to this inquiry: the Complainant must demonstrate that it has rights in a trademark and, if so, the disputed domain name must be shown to be identical or confusingly similar to the trademark.
The Respondent contends that the way the Complaint is framed presents the trademark rights relied on by the Complainant as a conjunctive composite of registered rights, goodwill in its brand and secondary meaning. ...
2018-04-16 - Case Details
The Panel will address the three aspects of the Policy listed above.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has produced registration certificates granted by the Registrar of Trademarks, in its favour in respect of the trademark WIPRO and its derivatives in the class 9, 16, 35, and 42, dating back to May 27, 1976.
...The WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition ("WIPO Overview 3.0"), section 1.7 provides the consensus view of panelists: "While each case is judged on its own merits, in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing."
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark WIPRO in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2018-06-07 - Case Details
The Panel has taken into consideration all of the evidence, annexed material and submissions provided by the Parties.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
In cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy. ...Accordingly, this Panel finds that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark, and the first element of the Policy under paragraph 4(a)(i) has been satisfied.
...
2019-04-04 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to its BIBO MART trademark, comprising that mark in its entirety with the addition only of the generic Top-Level Domains (“gTLDs”) “.com” and “.info” respectively.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it has registered trademark rights in Viet Nam for marks including the term BIBO MART. ...
2018-08-08 - Case Details
Upon considering the above, the Panel determines that English be the language of the proceeding.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the Complainant to show that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...Consequently, the Panel finds that the Complainant has shown that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Once the complainant establishes a prima facie case that the respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, the burden of production shifts to the respondent to show that it has rights or legitimate interests in respect to the disputed domain name (WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.1).
...
2018-08-27 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends as follows:
The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's FB trademarks. The Disputed Domain Name incorporates Complainant’s FB trademark in its entirety with the addition of the term “data miner”. ...Therefore the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark FB.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Complainant states it has not granted Respondent any license or authorization to make any use whatsoever of its FB trademark in the Disputed Domain Name or otherwise. ...
2018-12-26 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark and therefore meeting the first element of the UDRP according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...D2000-0113).
Hence, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark IQOS.
In view of the above, the Panel finds that neither the added gTLD “.com” nor the added geographical term “America” do not prevent a finding of confusing similarity under the first element.
...
2019-02-12 - Case Details