The onus of proving these elements is on the Complainant.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the f irst element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
See, for example, Europe Plein Air - E.P.A. v. Tony Youssef, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-12-20 - Case Details
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules directs the Panel to decide the Complaint on the basis of the statements and
documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that
it deems applicable.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical with, or
confusingly similar to, the Complainant’s trademark rights.
...Rothnie
Sole Panelist
Date: September 6, 2023
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
1. The Parties
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith...
2023-09-13 - Case Details
On the basis of all of the above circumstances, taken together, the Panel concludes that it is more likely than
not that the Domain Names are under common control, and that consolidation of the cases against the
Respondents would be fair and equitable to all Parties.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has shown that it has registered rights in the Trade Marks. The Domain Names are
confusingly similar to the Trade Marks as they incorporate ALL SAINTS in its entirety. ...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Trade Marks in which the
Complainant has rights.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0361.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2023-07-04 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has established rights over the trademark BABOLAT based on the
trademark registrations cited under section 4 above and the related trademark registration details submitted
as annex 6 to the Complaint.
...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain names are confusingly
similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the
Policy.
...
2023-05-24 - Case Details
Correspondingly the Respondent is not granted a right of reply.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has produced a copy of the registration record in the WIPO Madrid Monitor of International Trademarks showing it to be the owner of the trademark HACKINGTEAM. ...Accordingly the Panel finds the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark and finds for the Complainant under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2018-06-01 - Case Details
Further, Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Marks as it consists only of the term “spinzcasino” and the suffix “.com”, which both do not create an overall different impression.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant is the proprietor of a number of trade mark registrations for the word and figurative marks “SPINCASINO”, including in the European Union. ...
2020-11-24 - Case Details
case=D2012-1909
page 5
6.2 Substantive Matters
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Discussion and Findings
6.2 Substantive Matters
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2026-04-17 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant submits that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainant has rights, particularly because the addition of the descriptive terms “best” and “spy” does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity with the Complainant’s Trademark, which remains clearly recognizable in the Disputed Domain Name.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has rights to a trademark or service mark as reflected in the Trademark.
...
2019-07-08 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that it has the requisite rights in its registered trademarks INSTA and INSTAGRAM and that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to those trademarks. The generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) attaching to each disputed domain name is not relevant to confusing similarity. ...The Respondent will hereafter be referred to in the singular.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied by the evidence presented that the Complainant holds and has rights in the trademarks INSTA and INSTAGRAM. ...
2021-01-14 - Case Details
Belize Domain WhoIs Service Lt,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1954).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is a territorial chamber of the official Spanish Chamber of Commerce operating under the name Cámara Gijón. ...This behavior, in addition to the fact that the Respondent has also been named a respondent in a similar case (involving a domain name confusingly similar to the name and trademark of an Indian entity, which domain name resolved to a Web site with content in Japanese, related to foreign exchange trading) (see WIPRO Limited v. ...
2019-11-21 - Case Details
The Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the BVLGARI /
BULGARI trademarks, in which it has registered and unregistered rights.
5.2. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-12-07 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has rights in the LBBW trademark. The Panel finds the Disputed Domain Name is identical to this trademark. ...D2003-0187: “Previous Panels have held that the awareness of a Complainant’s mark at the time of registration of a disputed domain name that is confusingly similar to that mark is evidence of bad faith” (see also the cases therein cited to similar effect).
...
2021-10-26 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s INSTAGRAM mark. The Complainant explains that the disputed domain name contains an intentional misspelling of the INSTAGRAM mark, substituting a lower case L (“l”) for the upper case I (“I”). ...International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s INSTAGRAM mark, a well-known mark in which the Complainant has established rights through registration and use. ...
2021-06-02 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
7. Decision...
2024-08-30 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions largely as a standing requirement. ...This is because these Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar
to the Complainants’ GALERIE VEDOVI mark and they do not include any additional word or term that may
identify themselves as resolving to a criticism website. ...
2024-12-10 - Case Details
The Complainant bears the burden of proof of each of them.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Discussion and Findings
6.1 Language of the Proceeding
6.2 Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-11-26 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 6
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Accordingly, each of the disputed domain names is confusingly similar to on of the marks for the purposes of
the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
...
2024-05-13 - Case Details
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules directs the Panel to decide the Complaint on the basis of the statements and
documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that
the Panel deems applicable.
page 4
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical with, or
confusingly similar to, the Complainant’s name, trademark or service mark.
There are two parts to this inquiry: the Complainant must demonstrate that it has rights in a name or mark at
the date the Complaint was filed and, if so, the disputed domain name must be identical or confusingly
similar to the name or mark.
For present purposes, the Complainant has proven that it owns a registered trademark for PRESIDENT as
discussed in section 4 above.
...
2022-12-20 - Case Details
Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the
VALENTINO mark, as all contain this trademark followed by a geographical term or abbreviation and the
generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.net” or “.com”, which is merely instrumental and shall be disregarded in
the assessment of confusing similarity.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-12-11 - Case Details
D2002-0122).
The Panel finds that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s OLTRE trademark.
Complainant has established Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
...Respondent
7. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
8. Decision...
2022-04-21 - Case Details