Complainant
Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to trademarks in which
Complainant has rights, in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the trademark GILEAD through registration and use
demonstrated in the record. The Panel also concludes that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to that
mark. The GILEAD mark is clearly recognizable within the Domain Name, and the additional word “health”
does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the mark and the Domain Name.
...
2022-09-26 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, to succeed the Complainant must satisfy the Panel that:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the
Complainant has rights;
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusing similar to the Complainant’s Mark. ...
2022-09-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its reputable
NOVAGOLD trademark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name,
and the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...The Panel will further analyze the potential concurrence of the above circumstances.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant holds rights in the NOVAGOLD trademark.
The disputed domain name reproduces the Complainant’s trademark exactly.
...
2022-08-04 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name; and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...The Panel finds that all three of these elements have been met in this case.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This first element under the Policy functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2022-08-15 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant owns trademark registrations for the trademark KULULA in many jurisdictions. ...Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark of the
Complainant and that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2022-08-12 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the trademarks LPL and LPL FINANCIAL through
registration and use demonstrated in the record. The Panel also concludes that the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to those marks. The dominant element of the mark – LPL – is entirely reproduced in the
Domain Name, and is clearly recognizable within the Domain Name. ...
2022-08-11 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends as follows:
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the D. CANDAUX trademark in which the Complainant has rights, because it incorporates this trademark in its entirety, and the omission of the dot is not sufficient to avoid confusing similarity.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel notes that the Complainant is the registered owner of trademark registrations for D. ...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed
domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain names is confusingly similar to the PAYTM Trade Mark
and identical to the PAYTM INSURANCE Trade Mark.
page 4
B. ...
2022-08-01 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade
Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-07-01 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s Marks. Disregarding the Top-Level Domain (“TLD”), the disputed domain name is identical to
the Complainant’s 1XBET mark.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
On the evidence provided by the Complainant, the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has rights in the
Marks. ...
2022-07-08 - Case Details
The Complainant must evidence each of the three elements required by paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order
to succeed on the Complaint, namely that:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights in the ELECTROLUX trademark.
The disputed domain name contains the Complainant’s ELECTROLUX followed by the gTLD “.homes”.
...
2022-12-02 - Case Details
Considering these conditions, the Panel rules as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
With regard to the assessment of identity or confusing similarity, it is generally accepted that this test
involves a reasoned but relatively straightforward comparison between the Complainant’s trademark and the
disputed domain name (see section 1.7 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP
Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”))1. .../Alfred Meijboom/
Alfred Meijboom
Panelist
Date: November 23, 2022
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Case No. DNL2022-0040
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered or Used in Bad Faith...
2022-11-24 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated with supporting evidence that it has rights to the trademark SAP. ...According to WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition
(“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 1.7, a domain name is considered confusingly similar to a trademark if it
“incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is
recognizable in the domain name”. ...
2022-11-16 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or
established by national law of a Member State and/or European Union law
The Panel finds that the Complainant is the owner of the International Trademark EDMOND DE
ROTHSCHILD, designating the European Union, and that the disputed domain name is identical to
trademark EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and/or European Union law
B. ...
2022-11-15 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade
Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Discussion and Findings
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-11-08 - Case Details
Those elements are that:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
the Complainant has rights;
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established that it is the owner of registered trademark rights for the mark LES MILLS.
...
2022-10-31 - Case Details
Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 4
B. ...
2022-10-26 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade
Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, and the disputed
domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Marks acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-04-19 - Case Details