The above-mentioned circumstances lead the Panel to consider that the Respondent’s communication should not be admitted as a Response, albeit for the sake of completeness the Panel may take into consideration the information contained in the Respondent’s email in the assessment of the case, as any other evidence included in the file, if the Panel considers it may be helpful to decide the case.
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
In cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy. ...Accordingly, this Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark, and the first element of the Policy under paragraph 4(a)(i) has been satisfied.
...
2020-01-16 - Case Details
Having considered the Complaint, the Policy, the Rules, the Supplemental Rules and applicable principles of law, the Panel’s findings on each of the above cited elements are as follows.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires Complainant to show that the Domain Name in question is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s SKYSCANNER trademark in which Complainant has valid trademark rights. ...
2020-03-02 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s rights in the MICHAEL KORS name and marks.
The Complainant maintains that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...It is further noted that the Panel has taken note of the WIPO Overview 3.0 and, where appropriate, will decide consistent with the consensus views captured therein.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
According to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the .UA Policy it should be established that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the complainant has rights.
...
2020-03-24 - Case Details
However, the Panel may draw appropriate inferences from the Respondent’s default.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is required to establish the following: (i) that it has trademark rights, and, if so, (ii) that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademark.
...On the basis of the foregoing findings, and according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s “IQOS” trademark, and the first element of the Policy is established.
...
2020-01-31 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s “San Diego Cosmetic Laser Clinic” mark, in which the Complainant has established rights. ...The Respondent notwithstanding has registered the disputed domain name, which is confusingly similar if not virtually identical to the Complainant’s mark, and has linked the disputed domain name with the Complainant’s website.
...
2020-04-24 - Case Details
The Respondent further contends that the disputed domain names are not confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SAP trade mark. The Respondent lists the dictionary meanings of the word “sap” and contends that it is also of weak distinctiveness being composed of three letters. ...Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the SAP trade mark, in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant has satisfied the first element in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...
2019-12-18 - Case Details
The Complainants assert that the disputed domain names and are confusingly similar to the ALEX MUSIKA mark, and that the inclusion of “nyc” and “ny” suggests a connection to Musika as a New York based fashion designer. ...The Respondent notwithstanding has registered multiple domain names identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants’ mark, and the Respondent has redirected the previously registered domain name to the Respondent’s FrereNY website.
...
2020-01-10 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has established rights over the trademark TIK TOK based on the trademark registrations cited under section 4 above and the related trademark certificates submitted as annex 1 to the Complaint.
...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2021-08-16 - Case Details
It further submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its INSTAGRAM trade mark, in that the disputed domain name includes the word “gram” which it says is a distinctive and dominant feature of the Complainant’s INSTAGRAM trade mark. ...In these very particular circumstances, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s INSTAGRAM trade mark registration.
As a result, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark registration for INSTAGRAM and that the Complaint succeeds under this element of the Policy.
...
2021-09-02 - Case Details
International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s FIFA mark, in which the Complainant has established rights through registration and use in commerce. ...When the relevant trademark is recognizable in the disputed domain name, the domain name normally will be considered confusingly similar to the mark for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
3 Id.
4 See WIPO Overview 3.0 , section 1.11....
2020-11-20 - Case Details
International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s FIFA mark, in which the Complainant has established rights through registration and use in commerce. ...When the relevant trademark is recognizable in the disputed domain name, the domain name normally will be considered confusingly similar to the mark for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
3 Id.
4 See WIPO Overview 3.0 , section 1.11....
2020-11-17 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the BVLGARI marks.
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...On the basis of the evidence introduced by Complainant and in particular with regards to the content of the relevant provisions of the Policy (paragraphs 4(a) - (c)), the Panel concludes as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the BVLGARI marks acquired through registration. ...
2019-08-12 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the VERIZON marks.
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...On the basis of the evidence introduced by Complainant and in particular with regards to the content of the relevant provisions of the Policy (paragraphs 4(a) - (c)), the Panel concludes as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the VERIZON marks acquired through registration. ...
2019-07-24 - Case Details
International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s LAVOR mark and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s LAVOR WASH and LAVOR PRO marks. ...Regardless, the Respondent registered the disputed domain name, which is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s LAVOR WASH and LAVOR PRO marks and identical to the Complainant’s LAVOR mark. ...
2019-09-19 - Case Details
NOLDC, Inc., Alternative Identity, Inc., and Kentech,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0292).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of several trademark registrations for KIK in many jurisdictions, including the United States, where the Respondent is located.
...The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s KIK trademarks.
The first requirement of the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2016-10-20 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant has satisfied the first element in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...In other words, the Respondent is using the disputed domain name, which is confusingly similar to the LAND ROVER trademark, in connection with an offering of goods that compete with LAND ROVER branded goods. ...
2016-11-21 - Case Details
Taking the above into account, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the VODAFONE trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Complainant is required to make at least a prima facie showing that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the VODAFONE trademark and is confusingly similar to it. The VODAFONE trademark had been registered in the Russian Federation for more than ten years when the Respondent registered the disputed domain name. ...
2016-05-26 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has provided evidence of long use in commerce in the United States of the service marks WBNS-10TV and WBNS-TV, and has provided evidence of ownership of registration of those service marks at the USPTO (see Factual Background supra). ...The Panel determines that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's WBNS marks.
The Panel has determined that Complainant owns rights in the WBNS marks, and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to those marks.
...
2016-06-08 - Case Details
In the opinion of the Panel, this combination is confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks. See Saab Automobile AB et al. v. Joakim Nordberg,
WIPO Case No. ...In fact, as found above, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE widely known marks of Complainant. ...
2017-05-29 - Case Details
That the trademark ASSA ABLOY has acquired the status of a well-known trademark, especially within the door opening solutions industry, where it is the market leader at a worldwide level.
The domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights
The Complainant alleges:
-That the disputed domain names are identical and confusingly similar to the registered trademark ASSA ABLOY, as they incorporate it in its entirety.
...Sharif as a Respondent to this proceeding.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain names and are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark ASSA ABLOY, as they include said trademark in its entirety. ...
2016-04-18 - Case Details