A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence presented, the Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the NOVARTIS mark.
...Language of the Proceeding
6.2 Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-09-29 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel finds the disputed domain name confusingly similar to
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-06-22 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has demonstrated that it has rights in its SLEEPTOPIA trademark, both through its USPTO
registration and continuous use since 2013. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which
Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2023-06-22 - Case Details
NOLDC, Inc., Alternative Identity, Inc., and Kentech,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0292).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of several trademark registrations for KIK in many jurisdictions, including the United States, where the Respondent is located.
...The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s KIK trademarks.
The first requirement of the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2016-10-20 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant has satisfied the first element in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...In other words, the Respondent is using the disputed domain name, which is confusingly similar to the LAND ROVER trademark, in connection with an offering of goods that compete with LAND ROVER branded goods. ...
2016-11-21 - Case Details
Taking the above into account, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the VODAFONE trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Complainant is required to make at least a prima facie showing that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the VODAFONE trademark and is confusingly similar to it. The VODAFONE trademark had been registered in the Russian Federation for more than ten years when the Respondent registered the disputed domain name. ...
2016-05-26 - Case Details
Taking the aforementioned provisions into consideration, the Panel finds as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the Panel to consider first whether the Complainant has established relevant trademark rights. ...The Panel therefore finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's BLU trademark.
The Complainant has therefore satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2016-05-18 - Case Details
With regards to the disputed domain names that the Complainants allege are confusingly similar to INSTAGRAM, the Complainants allege that the registration of the disputed domain names on dates soon after Instagram was launched and around the time it had reached 1 million users is clear evidence of registration in bad faith.
...The Panel has reviewed the Reply and the evidence attached to it and declines to accept it, noting that it would not have had any effect on the outcome of the case.
Substantive Issues
6.4 Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainants' trademarks FACEBOOK and INSTAGRAM. ...
2016-05-18 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has provided evidence of long use in commerce in the United States of the service marks WBNS-10TV and WBNS-TV, and has provided evidence of ownership of registration of those service marks at the USPTO (see Factual Background supra). ...The Panel determines that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's WBNS marks.
The Panel has determined that Complainant owns rights in the WBNS marks, and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to those marks.
...
2016-06-08 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or confusingly similar
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark IKEA, which is an invented name having no other meaning other than as a trademark identifying IKEA as a source of origin. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel accepts that the Complainant has established trademark rights in its IKEA trademark registrations.
...
2016-03-07 - Case Details
That the trademark ASSA ABLOY has acquired the status of a well-known trademark, especially within the door opening solutions industry, where it is the market leader at a worldwide level.
The domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights
The Complainant alleges:
-That the disputed domain names are identical and confusingly similar to the registered trademark ASSA ABLOY, as they incorporate it in its entirety.
...Sharif as a Respondent to this proceeding.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain names and are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark ASSA ABLOY, as they include said trademark in its entirety. ...
2016-04-18 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trade mark VOLKSWAGEN as it completely integrates the VOLKSWAGEN mark and adds the generic Top-Level Domain ("gTLD") ".ink".
...She further contends that if the Complainant had found the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to its trade mark, it should have registered the disputed domain name during the sunrise registration period for the new gTLD ".ink".
...
2017-06-28 - Case Details
In the opinion of the Panel, this combination is confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks. See Saab Automobile AB et al. v. Joakim Nordberg,
WIPO Case No. ...In fact, as found above, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE widely known marks of Complainant. ...
2017-05-29 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar with the trademarks SWISSÔTEL in which Complainant has rights.
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...Thus, the Panel finds that disregarding the suffixes “-”, “the”, the geographical term “stamford”, and gTLD suffix “.com”, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the SWISSÔTEL marks.
The Panel therefore holds that the Complaint fulfils the first condition of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...
2019-02-19 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights in the mark CELGENE by virtue of its registered trade marks as well as unregistered trade mark rights deriving from its extensive use of that name. The disputed domain name, which simply contains an extra “L”, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark.
The Panel therefore finds that the Complainant has established the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...
2019-02-19 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the BUGATTI marks.
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...On the basis of the evidence introduced by Complainant and in particular with regards to the content of the relevant provisions of the Policy (paragraphs 4(a) - (c)), the Panel concludes as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the BUGATTI mark acquired through registration. ...
2018-03-26 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the GAMINATOR and MULTIGAMINATOR trademarks in which it has rights.
The Complainant submits that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...To take its decision on the dispute, the Panel has carefully reviewed the submissions of the Parties and the evidence attached to them.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has provided evidence for its rights in the GAMINATOR and MULTIGAMINATOR trademarks, the first of which is also registered in the Russian Federation, where the Respondent is located.
...
2017-11-21 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the BASF marks.
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...In summary, Respondent, by choosing to register and use domain name which is confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark, intended to ride on the goodwill of Complainant’s trademark in an attempt to exploit, for commercial gain, Internet users destined for Complainant. ...
2018-01-15 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
6.3 Although the Respondent in this case claims that the Domain Name was chosen to distance the website operating from that Domain Name from the Complainant's mark, the Respondent does not appear to advance a positive case that the Domain Name is not confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark. ...In the circumstances, the Panel concludes that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights and the Complainant has made out the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2018-01-30 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the RICK OWENS marks.
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...On the basis of the evidence introduced by Complainant and in particular with regards to the content of the relevant provisions of the Policy (paragraphs 4(a) - (c)), the Panel concludes as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the RICK OWENS marks acquired through registration. ...
2018-05-14 - Case Details