A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the mark INSTRUMART through registration and use. The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark. The Domain Name incorporates the mark in its entirety and adds the letter “s.” ...
2018-05-03 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the mark MWC through demonstrated registration and use. The Panel concludes further that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the MWC mark, inasmuch as the Domain Name incorporates the mark MWC in its entirety and adds the number 19, which corresponds to the annual MWC event planned for Complainant’s members in 2019.
...
2019-04-02 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s LINE-X mark as it incorporates the mark. Complainant contends that the addition of the descriptive term “owners group” deceptively implies that the site belongs to Complainant or is devoted to information about LINE-X franchise owners. ...Respondent
Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the LINE-X trademark in which Complainant has rights. ...
2018-08-16 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Mark because the disputed domain names are composed by adopting the Mark in its entirety followed by the single generic term “filter”. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Mark.
...
2018-08-13 - Case Details
From UDRP case law it follows that where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, the domain name is normally considered as confusingly similar to the trademark.
The Complainant owns numerous other domain names including the trademark SENER.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the proprietor of trademark registrations for SENER, both word and figurative marks. ...
2018-08-08 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has shown that it has registered rights in the Trade Marks.
The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Marks as it incorporates the mark CREDIT AGRICOLE in its entirety. ...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Marks in which the Complainant has rights.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Complainant has to make out at least a prima facie case that the Respondent does not have rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name (see WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.1).
...
2019-05-13 - Case Details
Complainant
In essence, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its prior trademarks for ELECTROLUX, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and that the disputed domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
...In the circumstances, the Panel holds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks and that the first element required by the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2019-05-13 - Case Details
The Complainant argues that the Complainant’s trademark is well known. The Domain Names are confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark and company name Equinor. The Domain Names incorporate the entirety of the trademark and company name Equinor followed by suffixes comprising of different key words referencing the business of the Complainant. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established that it has rights in the trademark EQUINOR.
The test for confusing similarity involves the comparison between the trademark and the Domain Names. ...
2018-12-21 - Case Details
According to the Complainant, the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to the Complainant’s HARIBO trademark as it incorporates the trademark in its entirety with the addition “-de”. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is not identical to the HARIBO registered trademark of the Complainant. ...
2019-01-17 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the mark SANDOL through registration and use. The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the SANDOL mark. The Domain Name fully incorporates that fanciful mark and merely adds the prefix “e” (which commonly denotes “electronic” and is suggestive of Internet commerce).
...
2018-10-24 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has exclusive rights in the OSU trademark. The disputed domain name contains the identical element "OSU" with the addition of "edu" and the gTLD extension ".org". Previous UDRP panels repeatedly decided to disregard the addition of a gTLD in determining whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service right in which the Complainant has rights. Aspect Capital Limited v. ...
2018-07-12 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is substantially identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Trade Marks BDO and BDO logo in which it has rights by virtue of its registrations and extensive reputation.
2. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights and the first requirement of the Policy is therefore established.
...
2018-07-06 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant contends that drugs bearing the trademark PLAVIX were being commercialized by the Complainant in various countries since 1998. ...Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark of the Complainant and that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2018-08-01 - Case Details
Complainant contents that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark as it contains Complainant’s Mark in its entirety, with the addition of the letter “t” at the beginning and that this typosquatting by Respondent is evidence of his intention to confuse Internet users and bad faith registration. ...It is plain enough that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark as it contains Complainant’s Mark in its entirety, with the addition of the letter “t”. ...
2018-08-01 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant contends that drugs bearing the trademark PLAVIX were being commercialized by the Complainant in various countries since 1998. ...Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark of the Complainant and that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2018-07-31 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant says the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its MILLE MIGLIA trademarks and that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, which was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Acronym Wiki Pty Ltd,
WIPO Case No. DAU2011-0007.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name comprises the Complainant’s trademark 1000 MIGLIA and the inconsequential suffixes “com.au”, which may be disregarded. ...
2018-07-27 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the mark SYNGENTA through registration and use. The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the SYNGENTA mark. The Domain Name incorporates the distinctive SYNGENTA mark in its entirety and merely appends the geographically descriptive letters “eu” (denoting European Union).
...
2018-08-27 - Case Details
Complainant
(i) The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trademarks of the Complainant, especially as the disputed domain name reproduces identically the trademarks NATIXIS and NATIXIS FACTOR.
...These elements will be examined in turn below.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The relevant part of the disputed domain name is “factornatixis” as the generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) “.com” is not relevant in determining confusing similarity and has to be analyzed without a legal significance.
...
2019-03-27 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the mark SCU STEINBACH CREDIT UNION through registration and use demonstrated in the record. The Panel concludes further that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to that mark. The only difference between the Domain Name and the mark (after disregarding, as is proper and customary, the generic Top-Level Domain “.com”) is the abbreviation “scu” which precedes the text “steinbach credit union”. ...
2019-05-02 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Pursuant to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant is required to prove the presence of each of the following three elements to obtain the remedy it has requested:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and,
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, a complainant must prove that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights.
...
2019-05-27 - Case Details