The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trade mark IKEA, which is a distinctive and invented term with no inherent meaning in English or French. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is not identical to the Complainant's IKEA trade mark. However, it incorporates the distinctive IKEA mark as its initial and most striking part. ...
2016-01-05 - Case Details
Respondent
Respondent did not reply to Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant asserts that it is a well-established and well-known manufacturer of pharmaceutical products based in Boston, United States of America. ...For these reasons the Panel finds:
a) Complainant has rights in respect of VERTEX trademark.
b) The Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's Trademark in so far as it contains the distinctive element "Vertex" accompanied by the descriptive and generic term "pharmaceutical".
...
2015-12-17 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant owns registered trade mark rights as set out above for the WISDOM AUDIO mark. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's registered trade mark right and that the Complaint succeeds under this element of the Policy.
...
2015-12-09 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name at issue in this case:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
There is no dispute that Complainant holds rights in the registered mark ULINE. As respects confusing similarity, the Panel concludes that the Domain Name is in fact confusingly similar to the ULINE mark. ...
2015-10-30 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant argues that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the VOLKSWAGEN mark, to which it simply adds a generic word, “space”.
The Complainant states that it has not given the Respondent permission to use the mark in a domain name and contends that there is no indication that the Respondent is known by a corresponding name or otherwise has a legitimate interest in it.
...Under paragraph 15(a) of the Rules, “A Panel shall decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.”
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant holds trademark registrations for VOLKSWAGEN. The material portion of the Domain Name repeats that mark in its entirety. ...
2015-10-28 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to marks in which the Complainant has rights. Specifically, the Complainant has trademark registrations for O2 and O2- based marks around the world, including in the Republic of Korea. ...Under these circumstances, the Panel finds it proper and fair to render this decision in English.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated with supporting evidence that it holds a number of trademark registrations in the O2 and O2 family of marks in various jurisdictions. ...
2015-10-22 - Case Details
Complainant
A summary of the Complainant's contentions is as follows:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark. The disputed domain name consists of the Complainant's mark plus the term "vr", which stands for "virtual reality". ...For the above reasons, the Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark.
The Panel therefore finds that the Complainant has established the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...
2016-07-05 - Case Details
Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name and the trademark VERIZON are identical or confusingly similar.
...As the only pleading before the Panel is in English, the Panel will render its decision in English.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is identical to the registered trademark VERIZON. ...
2016-05-09 - Case Details
Considering these conditions, the Panel rules as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The country code Top-Level Domain ("ccTLD") ".nl" is typically disregarded under the confusing similarity test under the Regulations, since it is a technical registration requirement (see Roompot Recreatie Beheer B.V. v. ...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's Trademark within the meaning of the Regulations and that the first requirement of article 2.1(a) of the Regulations is met.
...
2016-03-24 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name reproduces the entirety of the Complainant's distinctive trademark and company name, except for an inversion of the letters "e" and "l" in the word "arcelor". ...The disputed domain name in the instant case contains a slight and obvious misspelling of the Complainant's trademark, but the misspelled trademark remains the dominant and principal component of the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name is accordingly confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark.
The first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is accordingly proven.
...
2016-06-21 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends as follows:
(1) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. The main element of the Domain Name “millennium” is identical to the Complainant’s MILLENNIUM trademark. ...Accordingly, the Panel holds the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, and the Complainant has satisfied the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2016-05-19 - Case Details
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant NCH has registered trademark rights to the figurative mark TERMINALEN.
...The Panel therefore finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainants' trademark.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainants have satisfied the requirements under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...
2016-06-10 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks as they include the trademarks GENERAL ELECTRIC and GE in their entirety and that adding geographical indications do not help in eliminating the confusion. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the trademarks of the Complainant.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Complainant has made a prima facie showing that the Respondents do not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names. ...
2016-06-01 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has presented sufficient evidence to prove its registered trademark rights in the MICHELIN mark.
...Accordingly, the Panel holds the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, and the Complainant has satisfied the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2016-07-12 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant holds many trademark registrations for the trademark WESTINGHOUSE including registrations in Egypt. ...Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark of the Complainant and that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2018-03-21 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the mark ELECNOR through longstanding registration and use. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark, since it incorporates the mark ELECNOR in its entirety and adds the letter “s,” which addition does little or nothing to diminish confusing similarity to the mark.
...
2017-11-29 - Case Details
Aside from the space between words, the disputed domain name is identical to the MONSTER ENERGY Trademarks, and certainly is confusingly similar to the MONSTER ENERGY Trademarks. The Panel agrees that the gTLD does nothing to further distinguish the disputed domain name from the MONSTER ENERGY Trademarks.
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Panel finds that Respondent has no right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. ...
2017-05-02 - Case Details
Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or confusingly similar
The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is made entirely up of the registered trademark MICHELIN to which the generic Top-Level Domain ("gTLD") ".xin" has been added. ...As the only pleading before the Panel is in English, the Panel will render its decision in English.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is made up of the registered trademark MICHELIN, and the gTLD ".xin". ...
2017-06-14 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Marks acquired through use and registration.
...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Marks.
Accordingly, the first element under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy has been made out.
...
2017-04-28 - Case Details
As the only pleading before the Panel is in English, the Panel will render its decision in English.
6.2. Substantive Decision
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is made up of the registered trademark AXA, the numeral "3", the Roman letter "k" and the gTLD ".loan". ...In fact, the use of the gTLD ".loan" suggests a link to financial services. The Panel finds the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the registered trademark AXA.
The first part of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is therefore satisfied.
...
2017-04-18 - Case Details