Moreover, it is clear that in the present case, the term “La Quinta” is the dominant element of the domain name . In Sainsbury’s Bank Pic Company v. Owen Webster,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1246 (sainsburysfinance.com), the Panel agreed with the Complainant’s contention that the “Sainsbury’s” element of their trademark, incorporated in the disputed domain name, was the distinctive and dominant element of the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2011-08-10 - Case Details
The searches displayed on the page were as follows:
Under the heading “Most Popular”:
Insurance Continuing Education
Online Checking
Insurance Classes
Insurance
Bank Account
Internet Banking
Continuing Education
Online Banking
Under the heading “Popular Categories”:
Ing
Banks
Ad Banker
Apartment or Rent
Register
4.8 The meta data for that page also included references to “ad banker” and “Ad Banker”.
4.9 If the term “Ad Banker” was clicked upon, the following sponsored listing would be displayed:
Ad Banker Insurance School
Personalized Financial Advertising Tools
Cheap Insurance
Hondros College – Ohio Insurance Courses
Ad Banker Insurance
4.10 None of these sponsored listings linked to websites operated or authorised by the Complainant.
4.11 A few days later the registrant of the Domain Name recorded in the WhoIs appears to have changed to record “DI S.A.” as the registrant.
4.12 More recently the nature of the searches appearing on the website operating from the Domain Name has changed. ...
2010-10-18 - Case Details
Seocho and Vladimir Snezko, WIPO
Case No. D2001-1199; Royal Bank of Canada v. Personal, WIPO
Case No. D2001-0761; and Chanel, Inc. v. Estco Technology Group,
WIPO Case No. ...
2004-06-23 - Case Details
Ltd, D2000-0585 June 29, 2000 in which the domain name in issue was and in National Westminster Bank PLC v. Purge I.T. and Purge I.T. Ltd D2000-0636 July 4, 2000, in which the domain name in issue was
(7) The Defendant's intent in selecting the mark: This Administrative Panel accepts that on the evidence submitted by the Complainant, the Respondent lacked any bona fides in selecting the Respondent’s mark to incorporate same into these domain names;
(8) As to the likelihood of expansion of the product lines: There was no evidence of any liklihood of expansion of product lines.
...
2000-10-27 - Case Details
M. de Rooij, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0290, National Australia Bank Limited v Quality
Systems Consulting – QSC Pty Ltd, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0765, Benzer v. FutureSoft Consulting Inc. and Sunil Bhatia,
WIPO Case No. ...
2003-09-26 - Case Details
The Complaint was denied for the Complainant's failure to satisfy the registration in bad faith requirement of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.
- BAWAG P.S.K. Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse A.G. v. Future Media Architects, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-05-14 - Case Details
On November 11, 2004, he paid funds for the renewal of the Domain Name registration and for the web hosting facility, to the bank account of his local registrar. Because the Domain Name was then in park mode, and he did not log in to the Respondent's website continually, he did not notice that the registrar had not accepted the request to renew the registration, and had refused payment because of a problem within the registrar's banking or accounting systems. ...
2009-07-28 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant says that the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the mark and that the graphical elements of the mark need not be considered when assessing identity or confusing similarity (citing Sweeps Vacuum & Repair Center, Inc. v. Nett Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0031 and EFG Bank European Financial Group SA v. Jacob Foundation,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0036).
The Complainant says that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names nor in the mark and is not licensed by the Complainant to use them.
...
2009-05-19 - Case Details
In particular, the Respondent states:
“Some documents may have been partially redacted so as to preclude the inadvertent disclosure of highly confidential information such as bank account numbers, user names, passwords and the like.”
5.18 The Respondent provides a description as to the mechanism of transfer of the Domain Name to it. ...
2008-07-24 - Case Details
This stems from the fact that the disputed domain name contains sufficiently recognizable aspects of the relevant mark, including for example an identifiable reference to the letter string of such mark (see section 1.9 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 and ZB, N.A., dba Zions First National Bank v. Oneandone Private Registration, 1&1 Internet Inc / John Mike,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0137).
The Panel also notes that both of the Parties are somewhat exercised as to whether the disputed domain name could be described as a case of “typo-squatting” in their discussion of the first element of the Policy. ...
2018-05-24 - Case Details
Jesús Navarro Saracibar,
Caso OMPI No. DMX2013-0006.
11 Véase Bank of Scotland Plc v. Giovanni Laporta, Yoyo.Email,
Caso OMPI No. D2014-1539.
12 Véase Trend Micro Kabushiki Kaisha v. ...
2014-12-22 - Case Details
D2009-1583; Groupe Auchan v. xmxzl,
WIPO Case No. DCC2006-0004; Finter Bank Zurich v. Shumin Peng,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0432).
B. Unsolicited Supplemental Filing of both Parties
Paragraph 12 of the Rules allows a Panel in its discretion to request Supplemental Filings from either party, and although the Rules do not provide expressly for unsolicited submissions, under paragraph 10(a) the Panel enjoys a broad power to conduct the administrative proceeding in the manner it considers appropriate under the Policy and Rules, provided the parties are treated fairly and the proceeding is conducted expeditiously. ...
2015-04-07 - Case Details
Groupe Auchan v. xmxzl,
WIPO Case No. DCC2006-0004; Finter Bank Zurich v. Shumin Peng,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0432).
In view of the above and considering that most of the disputed domain names are comprised of the Complainant’s marks with the addition of English generic terms, the Panel finds that there is sufficient evidence to suggest the likely possibility that the Respondent is conversant and proficient in the English language and that the Respondent would not be prejudiced by the adoption of English as the language of the proceeding.
...
2015-04-07 - Case Details
Primatex Group S.A., WIPO Case No. D2001-0477; and Triodos Bank NV v. Ashley Dobbs, WIPO Case No. D2002-0776.
Moreover, the Panel can only infer that the Respondent knew that that is the way that viewers would interpret his choice of domain name and his decision not to qualify the name in any way.
...
2006-05-16 - Case Details
For example, under the heading “Errands”, there appears: “Bill Pay/Bank/Gift Purchase/Personal Shopper”. Under “Home Services”, are listed “house sitting”, “cleaning and maintenance referral”, “preparing home for arrival and departure”, and “property management assistance.” ...
2007-03-23 - Case Details
The Panel follows the reasoning of the panel in Lloyds TSB Bank Plc of London v. Daniel Carmel-Brown,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1889 where the panel held that: “It is well established that a high profile announcement of this nature can very rapidly create sufficient goodwill to found a claim to passing off under UK law: see , for example, the Judgment of the High Court in Glaxo Plc and another v. ...
2009-05-06 - Case Details
In addition, graphic elements, such as the Sweeps design, not being reproducible in a domain name, need not be considered when assessing identity or confusing similarity. See EFG Bank European Financial Group SA v. Jacob Foundation,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0036 , section 6(b)(i) (finding that the domain name was identical to the trademark where the text of the name was identical and only the graphic elements which cannot be reproduced in the domain name were left out). ...
2009-04-23 - Case Details
The registrant is effectively impersonating the trademark owner, and should not be able to claim the safe harbor protection of paragraph 4(c)(iii) (for examples of that view, see Triodos Bank NB v. Ashley Dobbs,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0776, followed more recently in 1066 Housing Association Limited v. ...
2009-04-17 - Case Details
Complainant states that UDRP panels have found confusing similarity when the distinctive part of a domain name was identical to the distinctive part of a trademark, citing the decisions in Finter Bank Zurich v. Gianluca Olivieri,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0091; Crown Trophy, Inc. v. PrivacyProtect.org/Pluto Domain Services Private Limited,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-11-16 - Case Details
[of Hollywood, FL]
Attorneys
Wisconsin
Dells Central
Larry
Mile [of Wisconsin]
Dell
Service Inc
Service
center for home electronics and computers
Bank
of Wisconsin Dells
Dell
Star Technologies Inc [of Tulsa]
Video
and surveillance systems
Family
Fun in the Wisconsin Dells
Jason
Conway [of Middlesex, United Kingdom]
Dells
Leather Works
Mun
Young Gu [of Seoul, Korea]
City
of Rio Dell, California
Dells
on Anderson Island Vacation Rental
Severson
Dells
Non
profit Nature Reserve & Environmental Education & Research Facility
Wisconsin
Dells
Dell
Alpe
Italian
Foods
Wisconsin
Dells Chamber of Commerce
Jennifer
O'Dell
Actress
Dell
Point Technologies Inc
Manufacturers
of gas and fire wood pellet stoves
Delliran
Company [of Tehran]
DigitaLive.com
[of Los Angeles]
Andrew
Dell [of Westminster, CA]
Wisconsin
Dell Visitors & Convention Bureau
Dell'Arte
Opera Ensemble
Walton
Dell's Website
Dell
Brothers
Formal
Clothing
Westfall
O'Dell Motors
Talkshop
Ltd [of Dublin, Ireland]
Superfly
Inc [of Stockton, CA]
Dell
Photography Incorporation [of Atlanta, GA]
Wisconsin
Dells Hotel
Eric
Simpson [of Walnut Creek, CA]
Rodeway
Inn
Laurent
Dellus [of Illinois]
Mercabe
Continental SA de CV [of Monterrey, Mexico]
Interwise
Inc, doing business as Itsyourdomain.com
DigitaLive.com
[of Los Angeles]
Dell
Engineering P.A. ...
2002-07-17 - Case Details