The Respondent also presented documentary evidence confirming the existence of and business activities of
ТОВ “Рейлтім” (Railteam LLC) during 2024-2026, specifically contracts and bank statements with their
descriptions.
The Respondent also asserts that the Disputed Domain Name is used within the scope of the declared
business activities; without infringing on the rights of third parties; without the intent to obtain an unlawful
benefit at the expense of the Complainant’s reputation.
6. ...
2026-08-04 - Case Details
Rons Porta Johns,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0952 (August 27, 2007); Associated Bank Corp. v. Texas International Property Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0334 (June 28, 2007); Gerber Childrenswear Inc. v. ...
2009-04-29 - Case Details
The Panel would also agree with the Complainant’s contention that the addition of the suffix “.com” is for Internet registration purposes only, being a requirement of the domain naming system, and does not serve as a distinguishing feature for trademark purposes under the Policy. See The Bank of the Pacific v. Digi Real Estate Foundation,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1112; Columbia Insurance Company v. ...
2008-03-18 - Case Details
Rons Porta Johns,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0952 (August 27, 2007); Associated Bank Corp. v. Texas International Property Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0334 (June 28, 2007); Gerber Childrenswear Inc. v. ...
2008-05-21 - Case Details
Foteini Papiri
Sole Panelist
Dated: February 26, 2008
1 See Royal Bank of Canada, Dain Rauscher Corporation and Dain Rauscher Incorporated v. RBCD Ain Rauscher,
WIPO Case No. ...
2008-03-07 - Case Details
Domains for Sale Inc.
WIPO Case No. D2002-0005, Keppel TatLee Bank Limited v. Lars Taylor,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0168, WebTrends Inc. v. Search Engine SEO Software Reviews, Mark Chu,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-08-03 - Case Details
The Respondent contends that the domain name was registered on behalf of the Respondent by the Complainant as evidenced by a bank statement of the Respondent showing that Mrs. Tarmey had paid for it. On the website to which that domain name pointed, the text “skirtingboardsdirect” was used and the Respondent says that they had become known by its customers as “skirtingboardsdirect”. ...
2012-07-20 - Case Details
Rons Porta Johns,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0952; Associated Bank Corp. v. Texas International Property Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0334; Gerber Childrenswear Inc. v. ...
2012-03-08 - Case Details
See, e.g.,ZB, N.A., a national banking association, dba Amegy Bank v. Alexandria Herrera,
WIPO Case No. D2017-1408; SAP SE v. Lakshmi Reddy Bhumireddy and P. Hareesh,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-01-22 - Case Details
D2000-0429 “the specific top level of the domain name such as ‘net’ or ‘com’ does not affect the domain name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar”; Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. v. Peter Ojo,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1770.
Moreover, where the relevant trademark is recognizable within the Disputed Domain Names, the addition of generic or descriptive terms or even letters or numbers does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity under the first element (sections 1.8 and 1.9 of the WIPO Overview 3.0). ...
2019-08-06 - Case Details
Prior UDRP panels have held that a domain name containing the abbreviation of a complainant’s trademark
can be confusingly similar to that trademark, particularly in circumstances where the respondent is targeting
the trademark in question. See, e.g., BAWAG P.S.K. Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische
Postsparkasse Aktiengesellschaft v. WhoisGuard, Inc. / Name Redacted, WIPO Case No. ...
2026-02-10 - Case Details
In its supplemental filing, the Respondent further contends in paragraph 14 that Mr Bilal only permitted the Complainant to continue using the disputed domain name after his exit to facilitate the Complainant’s application for a bank loan. That does not appear to be consistent with the email correspondence set out above prior to June 2020.
...
2020-11-03 - Case Details
D2010-1355 (“[U]se of a well-known trademark to lure customers to a website that promotes counterfeit or fake goods would in most circumstances be considered bad faith use”); see also The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc v.Lauren Terrado,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2093 (operation of a “phishing” website, for the purpose of obtaining information from Internet users believing themselves to be dealing with Complainant, “is perhaps the clearest evidence of registration and use of a domain name in bad faith.”).
...
2014-10-29 - Case Details
Alex Szabo
NAF Case No. FA95614 (October 18, 2000); National Australia Bank Limited
v. Quality Systems Consulting -- QSC Pty Ltd., WIPO
Case No. D2000-0765 (August 31, 2000); Gonvarri Industrial, S.A. v. ...
2004-06-29 - Case Details
Respondent’s registration of Complainant’s mark as a domain name has prevented Complainant from reflecting its mark in a domain name. Respondent’s registration of the "World Bank" and "Movieline" marks in corresponding domain names ( and ) indicates that Respondent has engaged in a pattern of such conduct. ...
2001-02-08 - Case Details
a public company with limited liability, incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands) is a joint venture between Complainant and ABN AMRO bank, through which the two companies will jointly offer Internet-based financial services to consumers in Europe, starting in the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. ...
2001-05-18 - Case Details
The Complainant submitted that these registrations relate to the provision of goods and services within the activities of an internationally active bank and financial institute.
"CREDIT SUISSE" is also the name of the Complainant, which the Complainant claims is protected under the laws of Switzerland as well as based on Art. 8 of the Paris Convention, to which most countries in the world adhere.
...
2001-03-23 - Case Details
El Demandante alude a que "por
errores en la tramitación de la propia solicitud de mi cliente sobre
este dominio "internetnews.info" a través de Network Solutions
y Domain Bank, mi representada no logró registrarlo con base en sus registros
de marca INTERNETNEWS en el periodo de "Sunrise" como era su intención",
pero ningún documento ni otra evidencia prueba que realmente presentara
tal solicitud durante al periodo "Sunrise" ni que hubiera tomado medidas
para intentar reparar errores que no le fueran imputables.
2. ...
2002-05-17 - Case Details
Cheng of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, 4200 Toronto Dominion Bank Tower, Box 20, Toronto-Dominion Center, Toronto, Ontario, M5K 1N5, Canada and John Grootveld, Controller of Huronia Precision Plastics Inc.
...
2002-04-11 - Case Details