ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. I Flame
Case No. D2025-1169
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Therefore, the Panel will proceed to a
Decision accordingly.
5. Factual Background
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S (formerly LEGO Juris A/S), a worldwide known toymaker. LEGO
branded products have been marketed and sold for decades in more than 130 countries worldwide, through
authorized licensees. ...
2025-05-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Erdinc Muslu
Case No. D2015-0512
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Having determined that the Complainant has trademark rights in the LEGO mark, the Panel next assessed whether the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the LEGO mark of the Complainant.
...
2015-05-18 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Stacey Buckley
Case No. D2022-5014
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The US word mark LEGOLAND, registration no. 2334535, registered on March 28, 2000.
The Danish word mark LEGO, registration no. VR196300094, registered on January 12, 1963.
The Danish word mark LEGO, registration no. ...
2023-03-15 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. yean kwa, Emperor
Case No. D2024-1333
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant also has
LEGOLAND theme parks, with about 1.4 million visitors per year.
The Complainant is the owner of numerous LEGO, LEGOLAND, and other trademarks throughout the world,
used in connection with its LEGO branded products, including the following registrations:
- LEGO, United States of America (“United States”) Trademark Registration No. 1018875, registered
August 8, 1975, in class 28;
- LEGO, Singaporean Trademark Registration No. ...
2024-06-20 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Admin/ Peter Wong
Case No. D2014-0394
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The trademarks LEGO and LEGOLAND are among the best-known trademarks in the world, and the LEGO trademark and brands, as well as LEGOLAND have been recognized as being famous.
...
2014-05-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Bolo, Bolodewo Center
Case No. D2016-2174
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
4. Factual Background
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, toy manufacturer and owner of the wordlwide known brand LEGO.
It has become aware of the registration (on May 29, 2016) and use of the domain name , which is routed to a sponsored links page, all related to its own industry, such as "Lego toys, Lego store, Educational toys", etc.
...
2017-01-04 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Fries Jessica
Case No. D2023-1944
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the
world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries.
The Complainant, LEGO Juris A/S, is the proprietor of the trademark LEGO and marks incorporating LEGO,
such as the United States of America trademark No. 1018875 for LEGO registered on August 26, 1975, used
throughout the world in connection with the well-known LEGO-branded construction toys and other LEGO-
branded products since at least as early as 1953. ...
2023-06-30 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. N Rahmany
Case No. D2023-0608
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...page 2
4. Factual Background
The Complainant is Lego Juris A/S, based in Denmark and with subsidiaries and branches throughout the
world.
The Complainant’s LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in the United States and
the LEGOLAND theme parks have about 1,4 million visitors per year.
...
2023-04-13 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Ridvan kagan agca
Case No. D2011-1441
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840, stating, “LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260, stating, “In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”, and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-11-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Chung Hong Phil
Case No. D2009-1288
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...
2009-11-25 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is Kirkbi AG, the owner of many registrations in the U.S., Canada and in more than 100 countries around the world for the LEGO trademark, among which:
• U.S. registration for LEGO No. 1,018,875;
• U.S. registration for “LEGO and Design” No. 1,026,871;
• U.S. registration for LEGO No. 1,535,046;
• U.S. registration for LEGO No. 2,189,528;
• U.S. registration for LEGO No. 2,065,901;
• U.S. registration for “LEGO and Design” No. 2,060,284;
• Canadian registration for LEGO No. ...TMA185262;
• Canadian registration for LEGOVILLE No. TMA267689;
• Canadian registration for LEGO No. TMA275461;
• Canadian registration for “LEGO and Design” No. TMA210501
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies” or “the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the U.S. during 1953 to identify construction toys made and sold by them.
...
2004-07-20 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is a company established in Denmark and is the proprietor of the trademarks used by the LEGO group of companies (“Lego Group”) in connection with the manufacture and sale of the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. Lego Group was founded in 1932 and LEGO products are now sold in more than 130 countries, including in Europe.
...
2021-11-08 - Case Details
投诉人在中国营运已经有15年并且于2007年9月在北京国贸商城设立了旗舰店。
4. 投诉人及其前身于1953年在美国已经开始使用LEGO商标，他们对LEGO商标的使用范围广，具有独占性，且具有连续性。近10年来仅美国的LEGO建筑玩具销售就远超过10亿美元。
5. LEGO商标是世界最知名商标之一。根据Superbrands UK 提供的2009/10前500超级品牌清单，LEGO在全界最驰名商标和品牌中排名第8「见投诉书附件8」。
...投诉人所属的与玩具有关的LEGO商标，为驰名商标，在整个共同体和整个世界享有显着而广泛的名声。LEGO商标有巨大价值和商誉。
14. 被投诉人无法主张在其注册时不知道投诉人对LEGO享有的合法权利。
15. 被投诉人是故意选择含有LEGO商标的域名，将互联网用户误导到商业网站，以获得更多对出售其它类型物品的网上商店的访问量。
...
2010-03-09 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. xiang shuai liu, gg00hu
Case No. D2023-2709
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the
LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...
2023-09-04 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Hoang Van Ha
Case No. D2024-1946
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant is the owner of close to 5,000 domain names containing LEGO, including .
Furthermore, the Complainant owns many international and national trademark rights, including:
- Viet Nam trademark LEGO (combined), registered under Registration No. 4-0060988-000 on March 14,
2005, for goods and services in international classes 9, 16, 20, 25, 28, and 41;
- Philippines trademark LEGO (combined), registered under Registration No. 33872 on December 5,1984,
for goods in international class 28; and
- Japan trademark LEGO, registered under Registration No. 520470 on May 21, 1958, for goods in
international classes 20 and 28.
...
2024-07-16 - Case Details
分析与认定
根据政策第4(a)条的规定，投诉人需要向专家组同时证明以下三项胜诉因素：
(i) 争议域名与投诉人享有权利的商标相同或混淆性相似；及
(ii) 被投诉人对争议域名不享有合法利益或权利；及
(iii) 被投诉人对争议域名的注册和使用恶意。
A. 相同或混淆性相似
根据投诉人提交的证据材料，专家组接纳投诉人就LEGO商标享有商标权的主张。此外，该商标LEGO在中国得到了广泛的认可和使用。
争议域名由LEGO主体部分与“sn”组成。争议域名在 LEGO字样前面添加的“sn”二字，专家组认为“sn”改变不了LEGO名字在其中的可识别性和整体印象。
...因此，专家组认为投诉人满足了政策第4(a)条下的第二项举证责任。
C. 恶意注册和使用域名
投诉人于零售建筑玩具有很长的历史。投诉人对LEGO多年的使用和宣传，使得LEGO商标在积木玩具相关行业及地域，包括在中国，享有极高的知名度。
投诉人注册及使用LEGO商标的时间先于被投诉人注册及使用争议域名的日期。
专家组认为争议域名的主体部分与投诉人的LEGO商标有着混淆性的相似。...
2018-10-17 - Case Details
分析与认定
根据政策第4(a)条的规定，投诉人需要向专家组同时证明以下三项胜诉因素：
(i) 争议域名与投诉人享有权利的商标相同或混淆性相似；及
(ii) 被投诉人对争议域名不享有合法利益或权利；及
(iii) 被投诉人对争议域名的注册和使用恶意。
A. 相同或混淆性相似
根据投诉人提交的证据材料，专家组接纳投诉人就LEGO商标享有商标权的主张。此外，该商标LEGO在中国得到了广泛的认可和使用。
争议域名由LEGO主体部分与“sz-”组成。争议域名在 LEGO字样前面添加的“sz”二字（专家组认为是被投诉人所在的深圳的英文“Shen Zhen”的缩写）和标点符号“-”，不改变 LEGO名字在其中的可识别性和整体印象。
...因此，专家组认为投诉人满足了政策第4(a)条下的第二项举证责任。
C. 恶意注册和使用域名
投诉人于零售建筑玩具有很长的历史。投诉人对LEGO多年的使用和宣传，使得LEGO商标在积木玩具相关行业及地域，包括在中国，享有极高的知名度。
投诉人注册及使用LEGO商标的时间先于被投诉人注册及使用争议域名的日期。
专家组认为争议域名的主体部分与投诉人的LEGO商标有着混淆性的相似。...
2018-10-15 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the LEGO trademark used in connection with the LEGO construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
The Complainant is the registered owner of numerous registered trademarks worldwide consisting of the verbal element “LEGO”, amongst which are Indonesian trademark registrations No. ...Finally, TIME also announced LEGO to be the “Most Influential Toy of All Time” (2014).
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark, since it is nothing but a purposeful misspelling of the Complainant’s LEGO trademark.
...
2019-03-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Beats
Case No. D2019-0012
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The following factual information is derived from the Complaint and supporting materials submitted by the Complainant:
The Complainant LEGO Juris A/S based in Denmark is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products (e.g., Danish Registration No. ...
2019-03-13 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Truong Bui, truongbui1991
Case No. D2019-2894
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant owns more than 5,000 domain names incorporating the mark LEGO, the main one being . According to its policy, the Complainant should own all domain names containing LEGO trademark.
...
2020-01-17 - Case Details