ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Mehmet Bozkus
Case No. D2025-5244
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...As of January
1, 2025, LEGO Juris A/S was renamed LEGO Holding A/S to unify LEGO-branded activities and the related
intellectual property rights under one entity. ...
2026-02-10 - Case Details
A significant number of panels have consistently found that the Complainant’s LEGO trademark is well
known worldwide (LEGO Juris A/S v. chen bing, WIPO Case No. D2023-2692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Contact
Privacy Inc. Customer 0163125175 / Daniel Perez, Lego and Jewelry Queen, WIPO Case No. D2022-3025;
LEGO Juris A/S v. Nabiev Ravshan, WIPO Case No. D2021-2061; LEGO Juris A/S v. lucy huston and jacy
fone, WIPO Case No. ...
2025-12-18 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Hayden Renee
Case No. D2025-0496
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademarks for LEGO worldwide, including:
- United States trademark registration no. 1018875 for LEGO, registered on August 26, 1975;
- European Union trademark registration no. 000039800 for LEGO, registered on October 5, 1998; and
- China trademark registration no. 75682 for LEGO, registered on December 22, 1976.
...
2025-04-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. / Eric Williams
Case No. D2009-1315
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is a Danish company that makes and sells the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other Lego branded products.
The Complainant and its associated companies are the owners of many international trademarks for LEGO. ...
2009-11-17 - Case Details
The trademark LEGO is a well-known trademark around the world. The Complainant and its licensees commenced use of the LEGO trademark in the United States in 1953. ...As stated in LEGO Juris A/S, v. Lego Star Wars Minifigs,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1231, “In addition to the trademark LEGO, the disputed domain name includes in the added suffix a reference to another well-known mark, that of the trademark STAR WARS. ...
2012-04-18 - Case Details
D2010-0470.
16 Paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the UDRP.
17 Id.
18 See, e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. An Bui,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1169, LEGO Juris A/S v. XMGlobal Inc,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1168, LEGO Juris A/S v. ...D2010-1015; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains by Proxy, Inc./ Phoenix Productions,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0798; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-08-29 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. The Unies Production, Ryan Guerra
Case No. D2011-1782
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...In this Panel’s view, the only realistic reason for using LEGO in either of the disputed domain names is to take advantage of the trademark significance and goodwill built up by the Complainant in LEGO and LEGOLAND.
...
2011-12-23 - Case Details
B 129258, LEGO, Registration date January 16, 1960, covering goods in Int. class 28;
- Republic of Korea Trademark No. 66677, LEGO, Registration date January 21, 1980, covering goods in Int. class 28;
- European Community Trademark No. 39800, LEGO, Registration date October 5, 1998, covering goods and services in Int. classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 20, 24, 25, 28, 38, 41, 42;
Several Panels in UDRP cases have considered the Complainant’s LEGO trademark as a well-known trademark (see, for instance, LEGO Juris A/S v. ...This website contains several theme related sub-websites such as “Lego Universe”, “Lego City” and “Lego Friends”. These sub-websites are linked with the main entrance page through a system of third level domains. ...
2013-02-21 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is a manufacturer of toys which started using the trademark LEGO in Denmark in the 1940s and in the United States in 1953. The Complainant owns hundreds of trademark registrations for LEGO, inter alia United States trademark registration no. 1018875 LEGO registered on August 26, 1975 (hereinafter referred as the “LEGO Mark”). ...D2010-1260; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0680). Furthermore, the Complainant is the owner of more than 2,400 domain names containing the term LEGO, including .
...
2012-07-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
行政专家组裁决
LEGO Juris A/S（乐高博士有限公司）诉 林高翔（lingaoxiang）
案件编号DCN2019-0019
1. 当事人双方
本案投诉人是LEGO Juris A/S（乐高博士有限公司），其位于丹麦。...争议域名完整包含投诉人的 LEGO商标。LEGO Life是投诉人为儿童设立的安全小区平台， “Life”的描述性词语因此与投诉人的业务有关联，更加强了与投诉人的LEGO商标的混淆性相似（见投诉书附件7），在LEGO商标之后添加描述性词语是不会改变相关的商标或否定混淆的相似性。...
2020-03-09 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Leevo E-Commerce, Harjo Vogelzang
Case No. D2011-1784
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant
The Complainant is the Danish Corporation which markets around the world the well-known LEGO construction toys and other LEGO-branded products. According to the Complaint, the LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to a number of other products, including computer hardware and software, books, videos, and computer-controlled robotic construction sets.
...
2012-01-04 - Case Details
投诉人
投诉人主张，应该立即将被投诉人注册并正在使用的争议域名转让给投诉人，理由如下：
5.1 争议域名与投诉人享有权利的商标完全相同或构成混淆性相似
投诉人指出，争议域名包含了与其LEGO商标完全相同的“lego”字样。投诉人引用了若干在先案例的裁决来证明其LEGO商标在全球享有很高知名度，并指出争议域名与其全球知名的LEGO商标构成混淆性相似。
另外，投诉人主张在争议域名中另外加上一个英文字母“o”并不能改变争议域名与投诉人LEGO商标的整体相似性；争议域名的后缀“.com”与判断相似性无关。
...投诉人还指出其并未授权或许可被投诉人使用其LEGO商标。
投诉人主张没有证据可以证明被投诉人使用LEGO作为其名称或对LEGO享有任何权利。
鉴于此，投诉人认为被投诉人对争议域名不享有权利或合法权益。
5.3 被投诉人对争议域名的注册和使用具有恶意
投诉人指出，其LEGO商标在全球享有极高知名度，正因为如此，越来越多的人恶意注册与LEGO商标相似的网络域名，目的在于利用LEGO商标的声誉获取商业利益。...
2010-07-07 - Case Details
Complainant and its licensees are commonly known as the LEGO Group, which is famous for the manufacture and distribution of LEGO brand toys with a turnover in 2009 of USD 2,8 billion. ...One of the activities involves the “LEGO Formula”, established for people with ASD (Autistic Spectrum Disorder). LEGO models are made from second hand LEGO pieces and then sold i.e. via the web shop under the Domain Name.
5. ...
2011-11-11 - Case Details
A significant number of panels have consistently found that the Complainant’s LEGO trademark is well
known worldwide (LEGO Juris A/S v. chen bing, WIPO Case No. D2023-2692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Contact
Privacy Inc. Customer 0163125175 / Daniel Perez, Lego and Jewelry Queen, WIPO Case No. D2022-3025;
LEGO Juris A/S v. Nabiev Ravshan, WIPO Case No. D2021-2061; LEGO Juris A/S v. lucy huston and jacy
fone, WIPO Case No. ...
2025-12-23 - Case Details
Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has remarkably grown: the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2009, was more than USD 2,8 billion. ...The fame of the Complainant’s trademark LEGO was confirmed by numerous previous UDRP panel decisions; for example see LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. 2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-01-25 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Feng lingling
Case No. D2013-1798
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, of Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for the LEGO trademark around the world. For example: United States trademark registration No. 1018875 – LEGO, with the registration date of August 26, 1975; Chinese trademark registration No. 75682 – LEGO, with the registration date of December 22, 1976; International trademark registration No. 1006003 - LEGO, with the registration date of June, 17, 2009; European Community trademark registration No. 002829463 – LEGO, with the registration date of January 7, 2004, and many more.
...
2013-12-30 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks associated with the Lego brand of construction toys and other Lego branded products. The Complainant and its licensees commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States in 1953. In 2008, the revenues for the Lego Group were over USD 1.8 billion. ...
2010-07-20 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Wen Zheng
Case No. D2021-2515
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-10-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitation and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. He Wei
Case No. D2016-1146
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The disputed domain name wholly incorporates the Complainant’s LEGO trademark. The website with which the disputed domain name is used displays the Complainant’s LEGO logo and uses the ® symbol to indicate that LEGO is a registered trademark. ...
2016-08-02 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the registered owner of the trademark LEGO in numerous countries. A list of the LEGO trademark registrations of the Complainant is attached to the Complaint.
...Complainant
The Complainant is the registered owner of the LEGO trademarks, and also of over 2400 domain names incorporating the mark LEGO. The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America during 1953 (through its predestors), to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...
2013-08-08 - Case Details