The Panel is of the opinion that the Respondent should have substantiated that it would be unreasonably onerous if the submission were to be in English (e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench,
WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052). The Panel also did not find exceptional circumstances in the record which would justify a change of language to Dutch.
...
2022-04-21 - Case Details
Given the reputation of the EQUIFAX trademark and the unlikelihood of the Respondent selecting the
disputed domain name for registration by chance, the Panel infers that the registration of the disputed
domain name intended to draw income from the improper use of the connection to the Complainant was
registration in bad faith. (See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Floyd Goddard/ Oneandone, Private Registration,
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2023-02-14 - Case Details
The Panel takes this as corroborating evidence of Respondent’s
bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving
website suspension following a takedown request by Complainant).
...
2024-01-17 - Case Details
Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o.,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0933; LEGO Juris A/S v. Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1604; Accenture Global Services Limited v. ...
2018-01-03 - Case Details
关于通用顶级域“.com”，专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO 案件编号 D2014-0080。
...
2017-01-31 - Case Details
专家组认为这一决定并不会给当事双方造成不公平且能促使行政程序高效及经济地进行。并且，专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Zhong Huijie， WIPO 案件编号D2011-1381。
6.2 实质性问题：分析与认定
根据政策第4条(a)项的规定，投诉书必须同时符合以下三个要素，方能胜诉。
...
2017-10-03 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use complainant's trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com, Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-10-12 - Case Details
The Dissenting Panelist visited the disputed domain name and finds that the Respondent is not making use of the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. LEGO Juris A/S v. Admin Hostmaster,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1474.
Although the Respondent argues that disputed domain name has a generic meaning in Turkish, it would not be expected to associate such meaning with an offering of any goods or services or any other meaningful content. ...
2018-01-10 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use complainant's trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com, Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-06-23 - Case Details
鉴于此，为了不给投诉人带来不必要的资金负担和不便以及不延误行政程序，专家组决定接受投诉人所提交的英文版投诉书及相关材料，不要求投诉人提供中文翻译文本，但是专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。专家组认为这一决定并不会给当事人造成不公平且能促使行政程序高效及经济地进行。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉Zhong Huijie, WIPO 案件编号 D2011-1381。
6.2 实质性问题：分析与认定
根据政策第4条(a)项的规定，投诉书必须同时符合以下三个要素，方能胜诉。
...
2018-11-26 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use a complainant’s trademarks, generally no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-04-03 - Case Details
In previous decisions, panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from the complainant to use such widely-known trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-09-17 - Case Details
Dublin) Limited v. Dejan Macesic,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1698; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1311).
As shown in the evidence submitted by the Complainant, on January 11, 2018, almost three months after the abovementioned Cease and Desist letter was sent to the Respondents, the content of the website to which the disputed domain name resolved was substituted with content related to the purported acronym OCULUSGO, stating for "meaning "Orientation to Universal Free Creators Using Synchrony and Generating Prayers" (in Spanish language).
...
2018-06-05 - Case Details
Tropic Web,
Caso OMPI No. D2000-0624.
5 Ver LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung,
Caso OMPI No. D2012-2491....
2019-09-09 - Case Details
En este sentido véanse anteriores resoluciones, tales como el caso LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2019-03-13 - Case Details
Nevertheless, the Oki Data test has been widely adopted by previous UDRP panels and cited even if it refers to a non-authorized reseller, see e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. Daniel Aziz,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1829 where the panel brought this case some attention and concluded that the Oki Data test was not fulfilled.
...
2012-07-20 - Case Details
参见Aventis Pharma SA., Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH 诉 Jonathan Valicenti, WIPO案件编号D2005-0037和LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong, WIPO案件编号D2009-1611。相反，可能加剧消费者的混淆。在争议域名中将“official”同“bikkembergs”一起使用而形成“bikkembergsofficial”, 极易使互联网用户误认为该网站是投诉人或投诉人授权的官方网站。...
2012-07-30 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is not simply the trademark or the trademark with some ancillary or accessory connotation: e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. Legoverhuur.nl, Frank Schuermans,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1559 (legoverhuur.com) and IVECO S.p.A. v. ...
2012-02-06 - Case Details
Nokiagirls.com a.k.a. IBCC,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0102; LEGO Juris A/S v. Masayuki Sato,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1639; King.com Limited and Midasplayer.com Ltd. v. ...
2014-03-06 - Case Details
In this context, the Complainant refers to decisions where the panel found that there is bad faith registration where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. The Complainant cites here LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-11-27 - Case Details