Where the trademark is recognizable
within the disputed domain name, the addition of other terms – whether descriptive, geographical, pejorative,
meaningless, or otherwise – would not prevent a finding of confusing similarity under the first element (WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.8; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DBA David Inc/ DomainsByProxy.com, WIPO Case No.
D2011-1290).
Furthermore, it is generally maintained that the addition of a gTLD is a standard registration requirement.
...
2023-09-08 - Case Details
In the present case, the Panel notes that Respondent by incorporating the entirety of Complainant’s famous
GEICO Mark into the disputed domain name to access a website featuring that mark to confuse consumers,
providing a “opening soon” banner appears inactive and similar in configuration to those “coming soon” sites
considered in decisions by prior UDRP panels under the doctrine of passive holding. See LEGO Juris A/S v.
Registration Private, Domains by Proxy, LLC / Leonel Andaya, WIPO Case No. D2021-0563; see also
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2023-08-24 - Case Details
It is well
settled under the Policy that a knowingly infringing use of a trademark to offer goods and services is not a
bona fide offering of goods and services under the Policy.”); LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David
Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-02-06 - Case Details
Por ello, de conformidad
con los criterios de los paneles, que han reconocido que cuando la marca de la Promovente es reconocible
en el nombre de dominio en disputa, hay semejanza en grado de confusión, aunque se añadan otros
elementos. (Ver LEGO Juris A/S c. Pablo Alberto Camarena Carreola, Caso OMPI No. DMX2023-0001).
iii. La presencia de la palabra KAESER que identifica a las marcas de la Promovente se encuentra
claramente incluida dentro del nombre de dominio en disputa, lo que basta para concluir que existe la
similitud en grado de confusión que exige la LDRP.
...
2024-04-29 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use their trademarks, the
composition of the disputed domain name, and the fact that the disputed domain name has been used to
create email addresses used in an attempt to impersonate the Complainant, no actual or contemplated
bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear
Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd,
David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No.
...
2024-04-25 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its
trademarks and the composition of the disputed domain name, no actual or contemplated bona fide or
legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company
S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-06-03 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-01-23 - Case Details
Alias 1 has been named in a number of UDRP decisions involving multiple respondents, suggesting that
this may be a pattern of behaviour. (e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Gruenewald Stephanie; Engel Dominik;
Koch Anja; and Client Care, Web Commerce Communications Limited, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-02-22 - Case Details
D2004-1101: “registration of a domain name in order to
utilize another’s well-known trademark by attracting Internet users to a website for commercial gain constitutes a form of bad faith.”
5 See LEGO Juris A/S v. ayoub lagnadi, WIPO Case No. D2022-3337: “Given such prior use, the fact that afterwards said websites
were taken down does not prevent such a finding of bad faith.” ...
2023-06-05 - Case Details
The Panel takes this as
corroborating evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. See e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim
Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a takedown request by
Complainant).
...
2023-06-14 - Case Details
The Complainant has provided evidence that it owned numerous trademark registrations of the ALFA LAVAL
mark long before the date that the disputed domain names were registered and that the Complainant is not
affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark
(see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd,
Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-06-22 - Case Details
case=D2016-1338
page 5
Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy,
Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-06-22 - Case Details
Andre Machado, Alugue, WIPO Case No.
D2020-1386; LEGO Juris A/S v. Wen Zheng, WIPO Case No. D2021-2515; and LIDL Stiftung & Co. KG v.
Lards Renoud, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-02-19 - Case Details
D2019-0733; Inter IKEA Systems BV (IISVB) v. Hosein Bagheri, WIPO Case No.
D2016-0432; LEGO Juris A/S v. Simonovi Eood, WIPO Case No. D2012-0863). The Panel finds that the
disputed domain name carries a risk of implied affiliation with the Complainant. ...
2024-05-30 - Case Details
In the absence of any license
or permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks and the composition of the disputed domain name,
no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be
claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO
Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host
master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-07-25 - Case Details
Noting the composition of the
disputed domain name, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its
trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could
reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875;
and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd,
Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-03-26 - Case Details
The Complainant provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the CRACKER BARREL marks
long before the date that the disputed domain names were registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has
it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S
v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO
Case No. ...
2022-06-02 - Case Details
Registration Private,
Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2019-
3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion
Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-04-27 - Case Details
Previous panels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or
confusingly similar to a famous trademark can create a presumption of bad faith registration. WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4; LEGO Juris A/S v. Aamir Abdul Wahid, Spiro Line Media, supra; Facebook Inc.
v. te5gfh gtfghbfh, supra.
...
2022-09-15 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or
legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain name (see, e.g.,
LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich, WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
The Respondent has no right or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name resolving to an inactive
website (see, e.g., Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...
2022-04-13 - Case Details