Moreover,
based on the circumstances of the case and the use made of the Disputed Domain Name to resolve to an
inactive error landing page, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods
or services nor making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Disputed Domain Name under the
circumstances of the case. See Lego Juris A/S v. Nofel Izz, JID, WIPO Case No. 2019-2601.
Finally, the use of a disputed domain name for phishing “can never confer rights or legitimate interests on a
respondent.” ...
2025-11-04 - Case Details
Moreover,
based on the circumstances of the case and the use made of the Disputed Domain Name to resolve to an
inactive landing page entitled “Coming Soon”, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not making a bona fide
offering of goods or services nor making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Disputed Domain
Name under the circumstances of the case. See Lego Juris A/S v. Nofel Izz, JID, WIPO Case No.
2019-2601. Furthermore, the Respondent’s use of a Complainant’s employee’s name and
“theparkingspotusa.com” when registering the Disputed Domain Name does not confer rights or legitimate
interests on the Respondent.
...
2025-10-17 - Case Details
Moreover,
based on the use made of the Disputed Domain Name to configure email capability as evidenced by the
MX records discovered by the Complainant, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not making a bona fide
offering of goods or services nor making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Disputed Domain
Name under the circumstances of the case. See Lego Juris A/S v. Nofel Izz, JID, WIPO Case No. D2019-
2601.
Moreover, although the record here does not contain evidence of a phishing scheme, the configuration of MX
records presents the possibility of such a scheme in which the Respondent attempts to impersonate the
Complainant. ...
2025-11-14 - Case Details
The Panel concludes that the addition of a country name (in the present case, “brasil”) to a trademark in a
disputed domain name does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity (LEGO Juris A/S v. 曹梦容 (Banks
Michelle), WIPO Case No. D2024-0427, dm-drogerie markt GmbH + Co. KG v. ...
2025-11-11 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its
trademarks and the composition of the disputed domain name, no actual or contemplated bona fide or
legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company
S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-06-03 - Case Details
D2019-0733; Inter IKEA Systems BV (IISVB) v. Hosein Bagheri, WIPO Case No.
D2016-0432; LEGO Juris A/S v. Simonovi Eood, WIPO Case No. D2012-0863). The Panel finds that the
disputed domain name carries a risk of implied affiliation with the Complainant. ...
2024-05-30 - Case Details
In the absence of any license
or permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks and the composition of the disputed domain name,
no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be
claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO
Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host
master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-07-25 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, sectie 1.7.
1 Aangezien de Regeling verregaand is gebaseerd op de Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”), is het vaste
jurisprudentie dat zaken die zijn beslist op grond van zowel de Regeling als de UDRP en dus WIPO Overview 3.0 relevant zijn voor
deze procedure (zie bijvoorbeeld LEGO Juris A/S v. Stichting RIBW ZWWF, WIPO Case No. DNL2011-0042 en Arie Hendrik den Draak
v. RAPIDE Internet, WIPO Zaaknr. ...
2025-01-23 - Case Details
The Panel takes this as
corroborating evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi,
WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a takedown request by Complainant).
...
2025-04-14 - Case Details
Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark
is shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent must have been fully aware of the
Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when it registered the Disputed Domain Name, given the
well-known and distinctive nature of the Complainant’s brand, evidenced by the various trademark
registrations for the Complainant’s Trademark that was put into use before the Respondent registered the
Disputed Domain Name.
...
2024-12-09 - Case Details
Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark
is shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent is likely to have been fully aware
of the Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when it registered the Disputed Domain Name, given
the well-known nature of the Complainant’s brand, evidenced by the various trademark registrations for the
Complainant’s Trademark across the globe that was put into use well before the Respondent registered the
Disputed Domain Name. ...
2024-11-28 - Case Details
In
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, the composition of the
disputed domain name, and the fact that the disputed domain name resolves to a look-a-like version of the
Complainant’s French website, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain
name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No.
D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure
Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-12-23 - Case Details
Noting the composition of the
disputed domain name, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its
trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could
reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875
and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd,
Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-10-31 - Case Details
D2019-0733; Inter IKEA Systems BV (IISVB) v.
Hosein Bagheri, WIPO Case No. D2016-0432; LEGO Juris A/S v. Simonovi Eood, WIPO Case No.
D2012-0863). The Panel finds that the disputed domain name carries a risk of implied affiliation with the
Complainant. ...
2024-10-29 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-10-07 - Case Details
Noting the composition of the disputed domain
names, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain names could reasonably be claimed (see,
e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v.
DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO
Case No. ...
2024-10-04 - Case Details
It is the consensus view of UDRP panels that signs with only one additional letter are, absent extraordinary circumstances, to be deemed similar, see Hachette Filipacchi Presse v. Saint-Clare,
WIPO Case No. DFR2009-0012; LEGO Juris v. Chris Jones,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1326.
Phonetically, the disputed domain name features the identical sequence of vowels with the differences of an additional vowel “o”, namely “BE-WI-O-N compared to “BE-WI-N. ...
2011-08-31 - Case Details
Gerardo Saavedra
Sole Panelist
Dated: August 9, 2011
1 Similar situations in LEGO Juris A/S v. Charlie Carmichael,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1507 and in World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. ...
2011-08-22 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have held that actual knowledge of a complainant’s trademarks and activities at the time of the registration of the disputed domain names may be considered an inference of bad faith. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494, Sodexo v. Shahzan - PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-08-13 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have held that actual knowledge of a complainant’s trademarks and activities at the time of the registration of the disputed domain names may be considered an inference of bad faith. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494, Sodexo v. Shahzan - PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-08-06 - Case Details