The Complainant and its licensees (collectively the “LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...However, as evidenced by the Complainant the numbers “4709” are not random numbers, for those lego fans and connoisseur “LEGO 4709” refers to a specific lego product – the Hogwarts Castle.
Since the disputed domain name clearly refers to a LEGO product and the website also clearly referred to LEGO products at the time the Complaint was filed one can reasonably conclude that the Respondent had knowledge of the existence of the LEGO trademark. ...
2011-02-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Le Thi Kim Phuong
Case No. D2012-1611
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The fame of the trademark has been confirmed in numerous prior UDRP decisions, including LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 (”LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”) and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-11-02 - Case Details
Moreover, the LEGO Trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO Trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2019-01-08 - Case Details
Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant’s LEGO Trademark has acquired the status of a well-known mark as it has been recognized by previous UDRP Panels in LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0680, and LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-04-24 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant asserts that it is the owner of the trademarks LEGO and MINDSTORMS and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO and MINDSTORMS brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has clearly established that it is the owner of the trademarks LEGO and MINDSTORMS through registration and certainly in the case of LEGO extensive use. LEGO is one of the world's leading brands in relation to construction toys. ...
2010-04-16 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Hongxia Wang
Case No. D2022-1742
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The dominant part of the disputed domain name
comprises the term “lego”, identical to the Complainant’s registered trademark LEGO. The fame of the
Complainant’s trademark LEGO has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions. ...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. By way of example, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2009, was more than USD 2.8 billion. 2010 was another good year for the LEGO Group. ...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”), Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260 LEGO, (“In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”), and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-11-29 - Case Details
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...The LEGO trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets, among other products and services. ...
2012-11-16 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant stated that it has registered LEGO trademark in many countries and over 2,400 domain names containing the term “lego”, the strict policy that all domain names containing the word “lego” should be owned by the Complainant. ...Therefore, in these combinations the word “lego” stands out and may lead the public to believe that there is an association with the well-known LEGO trademark.” ...
2013-07-29 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and various other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand for construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...The Complainant and its licensees commenced use of the LEGO mark in the U.S. during 1953, and the use of the LEGO mark has been continuous since then.
The revenue for the LEGO Group in 2008 was more than USD 1.8 billion. ...
2010-01-29 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. sakchai srion
Case No. D2012-0604
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...LEGO is rated as a “Superbrand” in a report set out in Annex 9 to the Complaint, which shows LEGO as number 8 of the most famous trademarks and brands in the world. ...
2012-05-18 - Case Details
In connection with the LEGO trade mark, the LEGO Group has, since 2009, enjoyed a trade in excess of USD 2.5 billion annually.
The LEGO trade mark is, and has previously been held to be, a famous or well-known trade mark (e.g.: LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-08-22 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. JH Kang
Case No. DCO2021-0060
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant also provides evidence that LEGO was recognized as a well-known trademark by panels in various prior UDRP cases, such as LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2021-09-23 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous Lego brand of construction toys and other Lego branded products. ...The use of the LEGO mark has been extensive and continuous since then. Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. ...
2010-03-02 - Case Details
The parking page contains also a column named “related searches” under which the links named “Star Wars Lego Set”, “Buy Lego”, “Lego Games”, Lego Star Wars Models” appears.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant contends that the trademark LEGO has acquired the statute of a well-known trademark, which has been recognized in several previous UDRP decisions. ...In the present case, the website activated under the disputed domain name contains several commercial links and in particular links named “Starwars Lego”, “Lego Starwars”, “Buy Lego”. The suggested related searches contained in the parking pay per click Web page directly refer to the famous trademark LEGO.
...
2013-01-16 - Case Details
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies” or “the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...Since the website clearly refers to LEGO products one can reasonably conclude that the Respondent had knowledge of the existence of the LEGO trademark. ...
2011-02-11 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. lego building co
Case No. D2010-2047
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Zacco Denmark A/S, Denmark.
...Related to this, the corresponding website shows a person carrying a LEGO brick in his arms.
(iii) The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith:
The Complainant’s trademark LEGO has the status of a well-known and reputed trademark with a substantial and widespread reputation through the world. ...
2011-02-04 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of several LEGO international trademarks and multiple LEGO trademarks around the world, such as the LEGO trademark No. 66677, registered in Republic of Korea, where the Respondent is located, in International class 28, in January 21, 1980 and duly renewed.
The term “lego” is also the Company’s name.
The Complainant also developed a presence on the Internet and is the owner of several domain names which contain the term “lego”.
...
2012-12-19 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of several LEGO international trademarks and multiple LEGO trademarks around the world, such as the LEGO trademark No. 66677, registered in Republic of Korea, where the Respondent is located, in International class 28, in January 21, 1980 and duly renewed.
The term “lego” is also the Company’s name.
The Complainant also developed a presence on the Internet and is the owner of several domain names which contain the term “lego”.
...
2012-12-19 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Kenan Yazici
Case No. D2013-1935
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB of Stockholm, Sweden.
...Complainant
The Complainant alleges that it is the owner of the well-known trademark LEGO. In the Complainant’s view, the Domain Name is identical and confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark. ...
2014-01-08 - Case Details