About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.024 sec)

Rows

<<  <  1641 - 1660  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2072 for carrefourtw.xyz pdf (157 KB)

In the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2025-07-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-5192 for lennarinsurance.net pdf (159 KB)

Moreover, based on the use made of the Disputed Domain Name, previously to solicit Internet users’ contact information, or the current use to resolve to an inactive error landing page, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services nor making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Disputed Domain Name under the circumstances of the case. See Lego Juris A/S v. Nofel Izz, JID, WIPO Case No. D2019-2601. In sum, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established an unrebutted prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name. ...

2026-02-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4268 for michelincareer.com, michelinjobsportal.com, michelinworkforce.com pdf (176 KB)

Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark is shown to be well known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when registering and using the Disputed Domain Names given the well-known nature of the Complainant’s Trademark and the fact that it was put into use well before the Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Names. ...

2025-12-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DES2025-0036 for buildabears.es pdf (158 KB)

Siendo, pues, que la denominación BUILD-A-BEAR es inherentemente distintiva, las referidas adiciones resultan del todo insuficientes para evitar la asociación con los signos distintivos de la Demandante, toda vez que simplemente crea un plural que enfatiza las marcas de la Demandante acentuando la semejanza y reforzando la impresión de que el Demandando bien podría ser su filial o asociado (LEGO Juris A/S v. Frederik Soleimani, Caso OMPI D2012-2133 y Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. Carlos Fernández, Caso OMPI No. ...

2026-01-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3771 for hudabeautymall.com pdf (166 KB)

Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith may be established where a complainant’s trademark is shown to be well known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when registering and using the Disputed Domain Name given the well-known nature of the Complainant’s Trademark and the fact that it was put into use well before the Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Name. ...

2025-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3764 for emazzaniti.net pdf (157 KB)

Moreover, based on the non-use of the Disputed Domain Name which resolves to an inactive Registrar’s parked page, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services nor making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Disputed Domain Name under the circumstances of the case. See Lego Juris A/S v. Nofel Izz, JID, WIPO Case No. D2019-2601. Based on the available record, the Panel finds that the second element of the Policy has been established. ...

2025-11-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2994 for shiftkeys.blog pdf (155 KB)

John Deecon, TrafficDomains INC., WIPO Case No. D2025-0282; LEGO Holding A/S v. John Deecon, TrafficDomains INC , WIPO Case No. D2025-0497; Carrefour SA v. John Deecon, TrafficDomains INC , WIPO Case No. ...

2025-10-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2649 for michelinma.com pdf (217 KB)

The Complainant provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the MICHELIN mark long before the date that the disputed domain name was registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademarks (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2022-09-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4247 for ccomfortkeepers.com pdf (173 KB)

Previous decisions issued under the UDRP have recognized that actual knowledge of a complainant’s trademarks and activities at the time of the registration of a disputed domain names may raise an inference of bad faith: (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (« La Caixa ») v. ...

2023-01-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1552 for modernayx.com pdf (276 KB)

The Complainant provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the MODERNA Marks long before the date that the disputed domain name was registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademarks (see LEGO Juris A/S https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ page 5 v. ...

2022-07-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1270 for whatsappstatus.live pdf (154 KB)

In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain name (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich, WIPO Case No. D2016-1513). Noting the risk of implied affiliation between the confusingly similar disputed domain name and the well- known trademark of the Complainant, the Panel finds that there is no plausible fair use to which the disputed domain name could be put that would not have the effect of being somehow connected to the Complainant (see, e.g., Instagram, LLC v. ...

2022-06-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0728 for packsdocanva.com pdf (183 KB)

In the Panel’s view, the Respondent’s use of the Complainant’s mark and logo to purportedly offer products and services similar to the Complainant’s products and services creates a misleading impression of affiliation and does not amount to a fair use of the Disputed Domain Name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org and Sun Chong, WIPO Case No. D2019-2263). ...

2022-05-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0540 for firmagonpromise.com html (17 KB)

The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations long before the date that the disputed domain name was registered and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2022-04-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3686 for trojanuvgroup.com pdf (191 KB)

The Complainant provided evidence that it owned the TROJANUV trademark registrations long before the date that the disputed domain name was registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2022-12-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2914 for buytiktokfollowers.xyz, freetiktokfollowersapp.xyz, howtogettiktokfollowers.xyz, tiktokfollowerbot.xyz, tiktokfollowercounter.xyz, tiktokfollowersapp.xyz, tiktokfollowersfree.xyz, tiktokfollowersfreeonline.xyz, tiktokfollowersgenerator.xyz pdf (157 KB)

In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain names (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich, WIPO Case No. D2016-1513). The Panel also finds that the nature of the services provided on the websites at the disputed domain names, in particular, adding followers contrary to the Complainant’s policies, cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services or legitimate noncommercial fair use (see, e.g., Andrey Ternovskiy dba Chatroulette v. ...

2022-10-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3213 for reassurefinancial.com html (19 KB)

A number of these include or are based on famous trademarks including O2, Sky, Lego, and VISA. 5. Discussion and Findings No response has been filed. The Complaint and Written Notice have been sent, however, to the Respondent at the electronic and physical coordinates confirmed as correct by the Registrar in accordance with paragraph 2(a) of the Rules. ...

2021-02-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1277 for carrefour-israel.com, carrefouril.com pdf (174 KB)

The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the CARREFOUR mark long before the date that the disputed domain names were registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2022-07-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1030 for geicocustomerservice.com, r8techfaxgeico.com html (19 KB)

D2021-0774; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo, WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo, WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter, WIPO Case No. ...

2021-07-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2021-0021 for serviciotecnicoelectrolux.com.co html (18 KB)

En este sentido véanse anteriores resoluciones, tales como el caso LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, Caso OMPI No. ...

2021-06-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2021-0065 for antipodesinvestor.co html (18 KB)

D2021-0774; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo, WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo, WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter, WIPO Case No. ...

2021-10-18 - Case Details