About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.024 sec)

Rows

<<  <  1641 - 1660  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0287 for sofitel.holiday html (18 KB)

It has been held in previous cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name's registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...

2015-04-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-2003 for uniroyal-tires.com html (18 KB)

Given the reputation of the UNIROYAL trademark, the Panel agrees that the Respondent’s bad faith registration is inferred. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie, L’Oréal v. 10 Selling, WIPO Case No. ...

2014-03-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2260 for audiexperience.com html (17 KB)

Lastly, there is a history of prior bad faith findings in cases involving the Respondent, for example, LEGO Juris A/S v. Noori net, WIPO Case No. D2010-1705; Banco Bradesco SA v. Noori.net, WIPO Case No. D2010-1553; Credit Industriel et Commercial SA v. ...

2013-02-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1811 for creditmutual.mobi, creditmutual.org html (18 KB)

Bad faith has already been established where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark, suggests opportunistic bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC, WIPO Case No. ...

2012-11-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1160 for goyardbags.net, goyardbagspree.com, goyardtotehandbags.com, goyardtotehandbags2012.com html (19 KB)

D2000-0306; Diageo Brands B.V., Diageo North America, Inc. and United Distillers Manufacturing, Inc. v. iVodka.com a.k.a. Alec Bargman, WIPO Case No. D2004-0627; LEGO Juris A/S v. Chainarong Wongkanya, WIPO Case No. D2012-0737). Therefore, this Panel finds that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s GOYARD trademark. ...

2012-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1957 for taringadescargas.com, taringamusica.com, taringamusicagratis.com, taringapeliculas.com, xtaringa.com html (18 KB)

Nokiagirls.com a.k.a. IBCC, WIPO Case No. D2000-0102; LEGO Juris A/S v. Masayuki Sato, WIPO Case No. D2011-1639). Therefore, this Panel finds that each disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the TARINGA mark. ...

2013-01-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1299 for elgizmuseum.com, proje4l.com html (18 KB)

The Panel finds that the Respondent’s knowledge of the Complainant and its trademark at the time of registration of the disputed domain names suggests bad faith, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494. It therefore follows that the Respondent, at the time of registration, has been aware that use of the disputed domain names would result in a violation of the Complainant’s trademark rights, Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...

2012-08-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0742 for konyaaegservisi.com, konyaelectroluxservisi.com html (20 KB)

Karaca Grup Ltd. Sti, WIPO Case No. D2011-1626; LEGO Juris A/S v. Probuilders, WIPO Case No. D2011-0226 (respondent’s use of complainant’s own logo implies connection and is not bona fide); Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...

2012-06-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0746 for buyswarovskicrystal.com html (17 KB)

Bad faith can be found when the Respondent was aware of the Complainant’ trademark at the time of registering the Domain Name. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; and Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...

2012-07-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1048 for osramimplant.com html (18 KB)

Kieran McGarry, WIPO Case No. D2005-0629. Additionally, in LEGO Juris A/S v. Matthew Griffith, Merlix LLC, Domain Administrator, WIPO Case No. D2012-0443 involving the domain name , it was held that the term “builder” should be disregarded for the purpose of this analysis. ...

2014-09-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2456 for ikea37.com html (17 KB)

Bad faith has already been found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC, WIPO Case No. ...

2013-04-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0897 for xyyandex.net html (18 KB)

BusinessService Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2007-1836; LEGO Juris A/S v. Jan Cerny, WIPO Case No. D2010-0707), decides that the language of the administrative proceedings is English. 5. ...

2010-08-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1070 for revlonhairproducts.com html (18 KB)

To the contrary, the Panel accepts that the addition of the words "hair products" to REVLON to form the Domain Name serves to increase the likelihood of confusion given that hair products are clearly relevant to the Complainant's business. See LEGO Juris A/S v. huangderong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1325. The Panel accordingly finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark REVLON in which the Complainant has rights, and that element 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied. ...

2010-09-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1372 for enmotionpapertowels.com, enmotiontowel.com, enmotiontoweldispenser.com, envisionpapertowel.com, envisiontoiletpaper.com, envisiontowels.com, georgiapacificbrand.com, georgiapacificbrands.com, georgiapacificlumber.com, georgiapacificpapertowel.com, georgiapacificpapertowels.com ... html (21 KB)

Further, use of the word “brands” in two of the Disputed Domain Names does nothing to reduce confusing similarity. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Phoenix Productions, WIPO Case No. D2010-0798 (transfer of and ). ...

2013-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0043 for ikeanovisad.com html (18 KB)

These goods include not only products of the Complainant, but also products of third parties - Lego and Media Markt. This clearly shows that the Respondent is operating a commercial website at the disputed domain name. ...

2014-04-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0184 for cleanprep.co, cleanprep.net, kleanprep.co html (20 KB)

Previous UDRP panels have found that where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494, Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC. WIPO Case No. ...

2014-04-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1119 for logihotels.com html (17 KB)

Further, where the distinctive and prominent element of a domain name is the complainant’s mark and the only addition is a generic term that adds no distinctive element, such an addition does not negate the confusing similarity between the domain name at issue and the mark (See LEGO Juris A/S v. huangderong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1325; National Football League v. Alan D. Bachand, Nathalie M. ...

2013-08-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1464 for redbull4free.com html (18 KB)

Bad faith is found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith and this clearly is the present case (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC, WIPO Case No. ...

2013-10-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1815 for balmein.com, blamain.com, wwwbalmain.com html (18 KB)

However, a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark for the purposes of comparison under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-11-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0868 for creditmutuel.services html (19 KB)

Thus, numerous UDRP panel decisions have made a finding of bad faith where a complainant’s trademark was shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the domain name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091; Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie, L’Oréal v. 10 Selling, WIPO Case No. ...

2015-08-05 - Case Details