It has been held in previous cases that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name's registration suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...
2015-04-17 - Case Details
Given the reputation of the UNIROYAL trademark, the Panel agrees that the Respondent’s bad faith registration is inferred. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie, L’Oréal v. 10 Selling,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-03-06 - Case Details
Lastly, there is a history of prior bad faith findings in cases involving the Respondent, for example, LEGO Juris A/S v. Noori net,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1705; Banco Bradesco SA v. Noori.net,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1553; Credit Industriel et Commercial SA v. ...
2013-02-04 - Case Details
Bad faith has already been established where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark, suggests opportunistic bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-11-20 - Case Details
D2000-0306; Diageo Brands B.V., Diageo North America, Inc. and United Distillers Manufacturing, Inc. v. iVodka.com a.k.a. Alec Bargman,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0627; LEGO Juris A/S v. Chainarong Wongkanya,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0737).
Therefore, this Panel finds that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s GOYARD trademark.
...
2012-08-08 - Case Details
Nokiagirls.com a.k.a. IBCC,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0102; LEGO Juris A/S v. Masayuki Sato,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1639).
Therefore, this Panel finds that each disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the TARINGA mark.
...
2013-01-23 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the Respondent’s knowledge of the Complainant and its trademark at the time of registration of the disputed domain names suggests bad faith, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494. It therefore follows that the Respondent, at the time of registration, has been aware that use of the disputed domain names would result in a violation of the Complainant’s trademark rights, Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2012-08-29 - Case Details
Karaca Grup Ltd. Sti,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1626; LEGO Juris A/S v. Probuilders,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0226 (respondent’s use of complainant’s own logo implies connection and is not bona fide); Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2012-06-11 - Case Details
Bad faith can be found when the Respondent was aware of the Complainant’ trademark at the time of registering the Domain Name. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; and Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2012-07-02 - Case Details
Kieran McGarry,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0629. Additionally, in LEGO Juris A/S v. Matthew Griffith, Merlix LLC, Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0443 involving the domain name , it was held that the term “builder” should be disregarded for the purpose of this analysis.
...
2014-09-12 - Case Details
Bad faith has already been found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-04-10 - Case Details
BusinessService Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1836; LEGO Juris A/S v. Jan Cerny,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0707), decides that the language of the administrative proceedings is English.
5. ...
2010-08-12 - Case Details
To the contrary, the Panel accepts that the addition of the words "hair products" to REVLON to form the Domain Name serves to increase the likelihood of confusion given that hair products are clearly relevant to the Complainant's business. See LEGO Juris A/S v. huangderong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1325.
The Panel accordingly finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark REVLON in which the Complainant has rights, and that element 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied.
...
2010-09-22 - Case Details
Further, use of the word “brands” in two of the Disputed Domain Names does nothing to reduce confusing similarity. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Phoenix Productions,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0798 (transfer of and ).
...
2013-10-28 - Case Details
These goods include not only products of the Complainant, but also products of third parties - Lego and Media Markt. This clearly shows that the Respondent is operating a commercial website at the disputed domain name. ...
2014-04-08 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494, Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC.
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-04-14 - Case Details
Further, where the distinctive and prominent element of a domain name is the complainant’s mark and the only addition is a generic term that adds no distinctive element, such an addition does not negate the confusing similarity between the domain name at issue and the mark (See LEGO Juris A/S v. huangderong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1325; National Football League v. Alan D. Bachand, Nathalie M. ...
2013-08-21 - Case Details
Bad faith is found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith and this clearly is the present case (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-10-16 - Case Details
However, a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark for the purposes of comparison under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-11-01 - Case Details
Thus, numerous UDRP panel decisions have made a finding of bad faith where a complainant’s trademark was shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the domain name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091; Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie, L’Oréal v. 10 Selling,
WIPO Case No. ...
2015-08-05 - Case Details