About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 144   document(s)s (0.029 sec)

Rows

<<  <  101 - 120  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2116 for coffre-fort-fichet-bauche.com html (18 KB)

Enfin, le fait que le Défendeur ait déjà été impliqué dans plus de 100 procédures UDRP ayant abouti à des décisions de transfert ou d'annulation des noms de domaine concernés est également une circonstance indicative d'un comportement de mauvaise foi (Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français c. Domain Park Limited, Litige OMPI No. D2009-0116). Au vu de l'ensemble des éléments décrits ci-dessus, la Commission administrative considère qu'il est établi que le nom de domaine a été enregistré et utilisé de mauvaise foi, conformément au paragraphe 4(a)(iii) des Principes directeurs. 7. ...

2015-02-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DME2015-0004 for boehringeringelheim.me html (18 KB)

Jameela Seif, WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF v. Assane Amadou, WIPO Case No. D2012-0714). Thirdly, this Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of a generic top level domain to the disputed domain name does not constitute an element so as to avoid confusing similarity for purposes of the Policy. ...

2015-07-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1275 for dollarretacar.com html (19 KB)

Jameela Seif, WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre. Assane Amadou, WIPO Case No. D2012-0714). Therefore the addition of descriptive wording to a trademark, in this case the misspelled phrase “rent a car”, is insufficient in itself to avoid finding of a confusing similarity. ...

2015-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1636 for carrefourcredits.com html (19 KB)

To hold otherwise would contradict the structure of the UDRP and would unreasonably exclude from its protection the owners of the many trademarks which comprise words that can be used descriptively in other contexts » (Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français c. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg, Litige OMPI No. D2008-1849). ...

2018-09-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4798 for service-public.net pdf (57 KB)

Mr Minwoo Park, Litige OMPI No. D2003-0989; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) c. Paco Elmundo, Litige OMPI No. D2002-1079 et aussi Synthèse des avis des commissions administratives de l’OMPI sur certaines questions relatives aux Principes UDRP, troisième édition (“Synthèse de l’OMPI, version 3.0”), section 4.5.1.). ...

2023-01-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4989 for secure-bforbanks-espaceclient.com pdf (220 KB)

Mr Minwoo Park, Litige OMPI No. D2003-0989; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) c. Paco Elmundo, Litige OMPI No. D2002-1079 et aussi Synthèse des avis des commissions administratives de l’OMPI sur certaines questions relatives aux Principes UDRP, troisième édition (“Synthèse de l’OMPI, version 3.0”), section 4.5.1.). ...

2024-01-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-3186 for veepeestore.tech html (20 KB)

Mr Minwoo Park, Litige OMPI No. D2003-0989; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Paco Elmundo, Litige OMPI No. D2002-1079 et aussi WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”, section 4.5.1.). ...

2020-03-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2238 for babblarna.com html (20 KB)

Jameela Seif, WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun, WIPO Case No. D2012-0714). Thirdly, this Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of the gTLD “.com” to the disputed domain name does not constitute an element so as to avoid confusing similarity for purposes of the Policy. ...

2015-03-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1840 for careerbuiler.com, creerbuilder.com html (21 KB)

Unasi, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2005-0556; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Miguel Casajuana, WIPO Case No. D2008-1593; and Red Bull GmbH. v. Grey Design, WIPO Case No. ...

2012-12-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1036 for wwwenbw.com html (20 KB)

Therefore, the Panel concludes that Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith. Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français - SNCF v. Damian Miller / Miller Inc., WIPO Case No. D2009-0891. The website to which Internet users are routed shows that the disputed domain name is used to promote the offerings of Complainant’s competitors in the energy field. ...

2013-08-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1582 for whatforaccutanebuy.com html (19 KB)

Gioacchino Zerbo, WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg, WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...

2013-12-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1571 for wwwosram.com html (18 KB)

Geocaching Zero, WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg, WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...

2013-11-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0673 for soprasteria.com html (20 KB)

Geocaching Zero, WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg, WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...

2014-08-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1322 for hotelibisbudget.com html (21 KB)

UDRP panels have determined that “the use of a domain name to point to a website that offers links to other websites providing services or goods which are similar to those offered by a complainant’s own website is evidence of bad faith”; see Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited./PrivacyProtect.org, WIPO Case No. ...

2017-08-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2709 for rbcroyalbnk.com html (21 KB)

Several UDRP panels concurred that “[…] the use of a domain name to point to a website that offers sponsored links to other websites providing services or goods which are similar to those offered by a complainant’s own website is evidence of bad faith” (See Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited./PrivacyProtect.org, WIPO Case No. ...

2020-12-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0730 for danoneandyou.com html (21 KB)

Why else would someone register a domain name and then allow it to be used to direct to commercial web sites, including the Complainant's? (see for example Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2008-0627 where the panel stated that use of the disputed domain to connect to commercial websites was a bad faith offering of goods and services; and Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...

2009-08-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1134 for leovegascasino.net html (22 KB)

Jameela Seif, WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF v. Assane Amadou, WIPO Case No. D2012-0714). This Panel finds that the addition of merely generic and descriptive wording to a trademark, in this case the word “casino”, is insufficient in itself to avoid a finding of confusing similarity. ...

2015-09-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4760 for caceis-investor.com, caceis-solutions.com pdf (213 KB)

Mr Minwoo Park, Litige OMPI No. D2003-0989; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) c. Paco Elmundo, Litige OMPI No. D2002-1079 et aussi Synthèse des avis des commissions administratives de l’OMPI sur certaines questions relatives aux Principes UDRP, troisième édition (“Synthèse de l’OMPI, version 3.0”), section 4.5.1.). ...

2024-02-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2579 for michelinhotel.com html (23 KB)

Several UDRP panels concurred that “the use of a domain name to point to a website that offers sponsored links to other websites providing services or goods which are similar to those offered by a complainant’s own website is evidence of bad faith” (See Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited./PrivacyProtect.org, WIPO Case No. ...

2020-11-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DPH2011-0004 for youtube.ph html (22 KB)

The Complainant alleges that the use to which the Disputed Domain Name has been put “does not represent a use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services” (see: Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2008-0627; Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...

2011-11-11 - Case Details