PrivacyProtect.org and Maying Joe, supra (finding to be confusingly similar to the VALERO mark, stating that “The addition of the words ‘gas station’ to ‘valero’ in the disputed domain name mitigates in favor of confusing similarity, particularly since such generic words directly point to the Complainant’s business.”); and Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Transure Enterprise Ltd / Above.com Domain Privacy,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0447 (“…the Panel does not consider, when analyzing the identity or similarity, the suffix, in this case “.com,” because it is a necessary component of the Domain Name and does not give any distinctiveness.”).
...
2014-02-17 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-05-01 - Case Details
Jose Gregorio Hernandez Quintero,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1050; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627 and Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...
2010-09-30 - Case Details
D2009-1507
No response
SNCF - Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Private Registration - BMON/ Telecom Tech Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0156
20 days
Atlas Copco Aktiebolag v. ...
2012-01-19 - Case Details
Geocaching Zero,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-08-04 - Case Details
See for example some recent UDRP decisions: SNCF - Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Transure Enterprise Ltd /Above.com Domain Privacy,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0513; Spenco Medical Corporation v. ...
2010-08-10 - Case Details
Le Défendeur a placé, puis retiré, des bannières publicitaires de distributeurs en rapport avec l’activité de la Requérante sur le site Web “www.cognacremymartin.com” et en tirait des revenus, ce qui ne caractérise pas une utilisation de ce nom de domaine litigieux dans le cadre d’une offre de bonne foi de produits et services (Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer français v. Ostrid Company, Domains by Proxi, Inc.,
Litige OMPI No. D2008-0627; Sierra Wireless, Inc. v. ...
2012-03-22 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds on the basis of previous UDRP decisions that the mere addition of generic terms is, in general, insufficient to make a disputed domain name distinctive such that it is not confusingly similar to the complainant's registered Trademark. ...
2014-11-03 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds on the basis of previous UDRP decisions that the mere addition of generic terms is, in general, insufficient to make a disputed domain name distinctive such that it is not confusingly similar to the complainant's registered Trademark. ...
2014-11-03 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds on the basis of previous UDRP decisions that the mere addition of generic terms is, in general, insufficient to make a disputed domain name distinctive such that it is not confusingly similar to the complainant’s registered Trademark. ...
2014-11-03 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-02-26 - Case Details
The addition of the “www” prefix has been cited as a common practice of “typo-squatters” who try to take advantage of the fact that Internet users may fail to insert a period between the World Wide Web prefix and the remainder of the domain name”); Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Sinclare Vabalon, BHG,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0886 (“the addition of the prefix “www” constitutes a typosquatting that does not exclude the likelihood of confusion between the Complainant's trademarks and the disputed Domain Name”).
...
2008-12-24 - Case Details
D2008-0707 (finding bad faith where the respondent intentionally attempted to attract for commercial gain Internet users to the relevant websites by creating a likelihood of confusion with the [c]omplainant's trade mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement or those website” through the domain names); Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid co, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627 (respondent's use of confusingly similar domain name for pay-per-click website deemed bad faith registration and use); Busy Body, Inc. v. ...
2008-10-14 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666 Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-02-19 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-03-06 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2013-11-21 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks owned by the Complainant because it is
comprised of the Complainant’s VALERO mark in its entirety, plus the abbreviation “ng” for the geographical
region of Nigeria, along with the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”), “.com”.
See Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Transure Enterprise Ltd / Above.com Domain
Privacy, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-11-18 - Case Details
El Experto nota que el nombre de dominio en disputa fue registrado en 2014 (sin perjuicio de que el nombre
de dominio en disputa hubiera pasado a estar a nombre de Jose Luis Vargas posteriormente) y que la
Demanda ha sido presentada en 2025, y considera que la oposición de la Demandante a la extensión del
plazo parece apoyarse más en un tecnicismo que en un agravamiento del supuesto perjuicio que se pudiera
derivar de la extensión del plazo para la presentación del escrito de contestación (véase SNCF - Société
Nationale des Chemins de fer Français v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. and GMMB Inc., Caso OMPI No.
D2010-2177; Afterpay Australia Pty Ltd v. ...
2025-05-22 - Case Details
专家组认为，单纯的域名购买或注册行为并不产生权利或合法利益，即使被注册域名包含了描述性或通用词汇。参见Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français 诉RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg，WIPO 案件编号 D2008-1849。因此，被投诉人仍应提供其对争议域名拥有权利或合法利益的证据，例如在接到争议通知之前，其在提供商品或服务的过程中正在善意使用或准备善意使用争议域名。
...
2021-08-11 - Case Details
/ ICS Inc.,WIPO Case No. D2012-1696; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited./PrivacyProtect.org,WIPO Case No. ...
2014-04-30 - Case Details