Mr Minwoo Park, Litige OMPI No. D2003-0989;
Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) c. Paco Elmundo, Litige OMPI No. D2002-1079 et
aussi la Synthèse des avis des commissions administratives de l’OMPI sur certaines questions relatives aux
Principes UDRP, troisième édition (“ Synthèse de l’OMPI, version 3.0 ”) section 4.5.1.).
...
2023-02-03 - Case Details
Since the Panel can find no evidence in the Record, considering Policy paragraph 4(c) or otherwise, to rebut the Complainant’s prima facie case that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, that case must stand as conclusive as to this issue. See, Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. yves Mw Invest,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0358 (“The Complainant, having made a prima facie case which remains unrebutted, has fulfilled the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.”).
...
2017-01-26 - Case Details
Marks consisting of only letters can be strong marks subject to the length and extent of use of the mark. See for instance Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Mark Tatum,
WIPO Case No. DCO2010-0053, (Where Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, popularly known by its abbreviation SNCF was held to be a protectable mark under the Policy). ...
2011-08-10 - Case Details
Such activity was not considered bona fide activity under paragraph 4(c) of the Policy as efforts to misleadingly divert customers with the intent of commercial gain is not considered bona fide use of the domain name under paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy. See Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited. / Privacy Protect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-03-24 - Case Details
It is also clear from previous cases under the Policy such as, for example, Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Charlie Kalopungi / Moniker Privacy Services,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0160, that the Respondent has engaged in a pattern of this type of conduct.
...
2011-06-21 - Case Details
RareNames WebReg / Rarenames, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0720; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849.
5. ...
2010-02-25 - Case Details
Palazzi
Sole Panelist
Dated: May 13, 2010
1 A search in the WIPO database of WIPO Cases and WIPO Panel Decisions shows that Respondent was a party in eleven cases and he lost in ten. These cases are: SNCF – Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Private Registration – BMON/ Telecom Tech Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0156, Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v. ...
2010-05-27 - Case Details
Such use which diverts Internet users who, via typosquatting, are looking for the Complainant’s products on the Internet to competing websites for commercial gain is not a legitimate, bona fide use and does not confer legitimate interests in the disputed domain name (See Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français - SNCF v. Damian Miller / Miller Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0891; Pi-Design AG v. ...
2012-05-14 - Case Details
The addition of the generic top level domain name extension “.com” is not germane to the Panel’s consideration as it does not provide any distinctiveness to the disputed domain name. Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SCNF v. Transure Enterprise Ltd/Above.com Domain Privacy,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0447.
...
2011-12-29 - Case Details
Moreover, in this case, the use of the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark to offer online hotel booking services in competition with the Complainant is disruptive of the Complainant's business and constitutes bad faith. See Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français - SNCF v. Damian Miller / Miller Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0891. Moreover, as the Complainant asserts, it is likely that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name to prevent the Complainant from using its trademark in the disputed domain name. ...
2015-07-21 - Case Details
DCO2011-0049). The panel in Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Mark Tatum,
WIPO Case No. DCO2012-0053, also found that "the Respondent is engaged in typosquatting, by attempting to take advantage when an Internet user seeking to access the Complainant's website at "www.sncf.com" inadvertently type de incorrect address “www.sncf.co"
In the present case, the Respondent, has no apparent links with Colombia, should have been aware of the trade mark PETROSSIAN due to its long use and well-known character worldwide, and cannot be ignorant of the website “www.petrossian.com”.
...
2013-05-17 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel concludes that Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith. Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français - SNCF v. Damian Miller / Miller Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0891.
The website to which Internet users are routed shows that the disputed domain name is used, among other things, to promote offerings of Complainant’s competitors in the field of coffee brewing equipment and supplies. ...
2013-12-05 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2015-06-04 - Case Details
Geocaching Zero,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-06-27 - Case Details
Geocaching Zero,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-07-11 - Case Details
Geocaching Zero,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-08-06 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF v. Assane Amadou,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of a generic top level domain to the disputed domain name does not constitute an element so as to avoid confusing similarity for purposes of the Policy.
...
2015-07-08 - Case Details
Enfin, le fait que le Défendeur ait déjà été impliqué dans plus de 100 procédures UDRP ayant abouti à des décisions de transfert ou d'annulation des noms de domaine concernés est également une circonstance indicative d'un comportement de mauvaise foi (Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français c. Domain Park Limited,
Litige OMPI No. D2009-0116).
Au vu de l'ensemble des éléments décrits ci-dessus, la Commission administrative considère qu'il est établi que le nom de domaine a été enregistré et utilisé de mauvaise foi, conformément au paragraphe 4(a)(iii) des Principes directeurs.
7. ...
2015-02-18 - Case Details
D2000-0859; Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Mariana Gemenitzi, supra; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited. / PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-12-13 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-02-14 - Case Details