About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center

ASP Dispute Avoidance and Resolution Best Practices Project

Application Service Providers (ASPs) deliver and manage applications and computing services from remote data centers to multiple users via the Internet or a private network. For application users, obtaining mission critical applications from an outside supplier provides a cost-effective solution to the demands of system ownership, such as up-front capital expenses, implementation challenges and a continuing need for system administration and maintenance, upgrades and customization.

There are a number of areas in an information technology relationship out of which disputes might arise, including software or performance, quality or function, project management performance, copyright and proprietary rights infringement, service failure, security breach, and loss of data or data integrity. Because of the "one-to-many" delivery model, an ASP's liability exposure in each of these and other areas is multiplied several-fold. Particularly in a cross-border international relationship, the commercial and legal risks increase significantly, as does the potential for conflict due to different legal regimes, commercial cultures and language barriers.

Recognizing the need for a cost-efficient, expeditious, global and neutral dispute resolution mechanism, at the request of the Application Service Provider Industry Consortium (ASPIC), the Center has developed a set of dispute avoidance and resolution best practices specifically tailored to meet the needs of the ASP industry.

The Center has also established a dispute resolution service for contracting parties in the ASP supply chain. Through the ASP Dispute Resolution Service parties may resolve service level agreement disputes through arbitration, expedited arbitration and mediation. Parties may also consult with the Center for assistance in drafting dispute resolution clauses.