About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Office of the Ombudsperson

The Office of the Ombudsperson at WIPO provides confidential, neutral, independent and informal assistance to all WIPO staff members and employees who have concerns arising from or affecting their work. The Ombudsperson plays a role in preventing conflict and restoring peaceful working relations, and offers an important in-house alternative to formal complaint-handling.

The Ombudsperson advocates for fair and equitable application of procedures and offers a portfolio of tailor-made informal conflict resolution services which strive to reach amicable and sustainable solutions acceptable to all parties and which foster respectable workplace principles and values. The Ombudsperson acts with strict confidentiality and will not reveal anyone’s identity, or take any action without the prior consent of the individual concerned. The Ombudsperson does not testify or produce documents in formal proceedings. Formal records are not kept, and any communications with the Ombudsperson are kept confidential. The office of the Ombudsperson does not receive notice of claims against the organization nor does it conduct investigations. And finally it does not act as a substitute for formal channels.

Being independent, the Ombudsperson reports directly to WIPO’s Director General. The Ombudsperson has no management authority and cannot create or change policy, or impose any given solution, but s/he will Identify systemic trends and risks that help managers make informed policy and management decisions that can help promote a more respectful and harmonious workplace. At the end of each calendar year, the Ombudsperson submits an annual report, including general caseload statistics, an analysis of trends and recommendations for the future.

The WIPO Ombudsperson practices in accordance with the International Ombudsman Association’s Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice

Our activities include:

Impartial and active listening

Throughout the consultation process, the Ombudsperson remains an impartial and active listener. Experience has shown that being able to openly discuss issues helps to obtain clarity on underlying interests and needs.

Evaluating available options

Together, the visitor and the Ombudsperson will review the various elements that contribute to a given conflict situation. Options are explored as to how best to address these issues, weighing the respective pros and cons. By enlarging the horizon in this way and considering the issues from new angles, new ways forward may emerge.

Providing information and making referrals

The Ombudsperson can advise on the available policies, rules and procedures or entry points for obtaining specialized advice with respect to administrative or legal issues. Depending on the nature of the case, a visitor may also be referred to other internal or external resources in order to obtain the appropriate assistance.

Informal fact finding

The Ombudsperson does not carry out formal investigations. Frequently, however, the Ombudsperson may be asked to look into and pursue an individual concern. Through informal fact finding, the Ombudsperson explores regulatory or legal provisions, administrative provisions, or establishes the facts underlying a given situation. This may imply some interaction with supervisors, the Human Resources Management Department and other in-house services.

Conflict coaching

Helping individuals to help themselves may be the chosen path of action in some cases. Staff can receive coaching to e.g. re-establish dialogue with a peer or supervisor or to address a concern in a direct manner. This may be in the form of role play, for example, or through advice on non-violent communication strategies and constructive writing techniques.

Shuttle diplomacy

In some cases, the Ombudsperson may shuttle back and forth between parties, transmitting information and feedback, in order to resolve a particular issue. Shuttle diplomacy may be applied when there is a breakdown in communication between parties or when the resolution of a concern requires a step-by-step approach towards a desired outcome. It can also be useful in preparing the ground for parties to meet.


Upon request, and where appropriate, the Ombudsperson can act as a mediator, facilitating a structured process of communication between parties, and helping them to work towards mutually agreed solutions or to improve their working relationships.

Upward feedback

Through interaction with individuals, and through careful evaluation of the various concerns raised over time, the Ombudsperson identifies trends and systemic issues and make recommendations to the Director General and other appropriate management levels regarding improvements to policies and practices that can help to promote a more harmonious and respectful workplace.