About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Innovation Gender Gap: In Canada, 1 in 8 AI Inventors is a Woman

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) conducted a study to measure how their female inventors were faring in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), and compared it to the global average. The report found that the Canadian share of female inventors in AI patenting lagged behind the rest of the world.

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
(Photo: Getty)

During WIPO’s IP Gender Gap Seminar Series (America’s region) held on October 14, 2021, Sean Martineau, the Acting Director of Business Improvement Services at the CIPO, shared main findings of the CIPO report on gender imbalance in AI, and introduced two new indicators they developed to track progress in the field.

Video: Mr. Martineau’s presentation during the Intellectual Property Gender Gap Webinar (Americas).

The report linked more than 85,000 worldwide patented inventions (published between 1998 and 2017) to WIPO’s World Gender Name Dictionary to identify the gender of inventors. The report found that Canada lagged behind the world average – only one out of eight Canadian AI inventor is a woman in comparison to the world’s one out of four.

In the Artificial Intelligence field, one inventor out of four is a woman in the world, against one out of eight in Canada.

To help track of potential improvement to the participation of women in patenting, two new indicators were developed to compare the gender imbalance trend with the world:

1.    The Gender Classification Index (GCI)

The GCI rescales the number of inventors of each gender to 100 in the first year and recalculates the number of inventors in subsequent years against this base. This offers easy-to-read values of the evolution of each gender. Go to minute 06:20 of the video above.

2.    The Relative Participation of Women  (RPW)

The RPW provides an indication of a country’s prominence of women in patenting relative to its proportion of patents in the sector of interest. A negative RPW value indicates that the country is performing below the world average, while a positive value suggests a better-than-average participation of women in patenting. Go to minute 09:30 of the video above

Do you want to learn more about Canada’s science, technology and innovation experience? Check our selection of innovation and IP-related studies on the country.

Other stories you may enjoy

Innovation Gender Gap: The Challenges of Measuring Gender Inequality in Innovation

Identifying where gender gap challenges in innovation are may be the key to help policymakers intervene effectively. Listen to the gender and diversity expert, Lisa Cook, discussing the issue.

Innovation Gender Gap: 4 Indicators to Measure Gender Gap in Innovation

There are several measures of gender gaps in innovation. However, choosing the “right” indicator depends on the purpose. Here are some suggestions on what to consider when choosing the type of indicator.

Related resources

Guidelines for producing gender analysis from innovation and IP data

Understanding how women and men can access and use the intellectual property (IP) system equally is key to ensuring that their ingenuity and creativity translates into economic, social and cultural development. This short guide summarizes best practice for producing innovation and IP gender indicators.