About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Experts Break New Ground in Traditional Cultural Expression Talks

Geneva, July 23, 2010
PR/2010/652

Experts from WIPO member states rolled up their sleeves this week and got down to the nitty-gritty of discussions aimed at reaching agreement on an international legal instrument (or instruments) to ensure the effective protection of traditional knowledge (TK), traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) and genetic resources (GRs). Their work focused on what is considered to be the most mature of the three subjects - TCEs - covered by the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC). 

Last May, the IGC agreed on arrangements for intersessional working groups (IWGs) to support and facilitate the IGC's negotiations by providing legal and technical advice and analysis, including, where appropriate, various options and scenarios. Member states agreed that delegations at the IWGs would be limited to one technical expert each. 

This new format – this is the first such mechanism for the IGC’s negotiations - resulted in an intense drafting session on TCEs at this week’s first meeting of the IWG. Experts, participating in their personal capacities, engaged in lively and active discussion. The specific expertise of the participants and the relatively small size of the meeting contributed to its success.  In addition to experts from WIPO member states, indigenous experts and NGOs also took part in the informal and open-ended drafting groups 

Each of these groups worked on drafting a specific article.  Experts from around the world worked side by side, debating and drafting together, inside and outside the main conference room. The groups came up with further revised versions of all the articles, which were presented to and discussed by the IWG as a whole. 

The outcomes of this week's IWG will be sent to the IGC for consideration at its next meeting.  The IWG has no mandate to take decisions or adopt any texts, but its work contributes richly to the evolution of the texts under negotiation in the IGC. 

In closing the session, the Chair of this first IWG, Mrs, Savitri Suwansathit from Thailand, praised the experts for their active participation and dedication. Ms. Ndeye Abibatou Youm Diabe Sibi (Senegal), Mr. Norman Bowman (Australia), Ms. Vladia Borissova (Bulgaria) and Mr. Eduardo Tempone (Argentina) served as Vice-chairs of the IWG. 

The IGC meets again from December 6 to 10, 2010.

For more information, please contact the News and Media Division at WIPO:
  • Tel: (+41 22) 338 81 61 / 338 72 24
  • E-mail