About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Whatever happened to payola? An empirical analysis of online music sharing
Author: Sudip Bhattacharjee, Ram D Gopal and James R Marsden [University of Connecticut], Kaveepan Lertwachara [California Polytechnic State University]
Source:

Decision Support Systems 42, no. 1: 104-120

Year: 2006

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Music
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To investigate whether online music sharing amounts to "lost sales piracy" or "pre-purchase sampling piracy".
Sample: 196 Billboard Top 100 albums tracked on WinMX
Methodology: Passive online tracking

Main Findings

The study observed significant piracy opportunity and activity on the peer-to-peer (P2P) network tracked. Levels of file sharing opportunities were related to the albums’ relative Billboard chart positions: the higher the chart ranking, the greater its availability.

Sharing activity levels provided leading indicators of the direction of movement of albums on the Billboard charts: with a two-week delay, chart rankings reflected prior file-sharing activity.

These results let the authors conclude that P2P file sharing consists of both “lost-sales piracy” and “pre-purchase sampling piracy”: while users certainly download and subsequently share popular music instead of purchasing the album legally, music sharing also allows “trial listening”, providing positive sampling (advertising) opportunities to the music industry, leading to album purchases.

In view of the fact that P2P file sharing is more than “pure piracy”, the authors recommend that record companies look further into this sampling that costs them nothing and reaches a very wide audience: with a zero or near-zero marginal cost product, are the suppliers better off with higher sales combined with piracy than with lower sales and no piracy? Strategies should aim at fostering pre-purchase sampling/advertising aspects of online sharing while minimising the lost-sales effects.

They also encourage leveraging file-sharing activity as an indicator of consumer interest and subsequent sales of music albums, permitting companies to make better marketing decisions.

[Date Added: Oct 22, 2008 ]