About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Trends and patterns among online software pirates
Author: Sameer Hinduja [Michigan State University]
Source:

Ethics and Information Technology 5, no. 1: 49-61

Year: 2003

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Software
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To examine the degree of participation in piracy and demographic characteristics of university students involved in software piracy.
Sample: 433 students at a large Midwestern university
Methodology: Questionnaire

Main Findings

Sameer Hinduja's student-based research data indicate that piracy incidence is higher among males than females, that Asian respondents seem more inclined to engage in piracy activities than any other race, that the financial status of a student is likely irrelevant to the practice of software piracy and that senior students pirate more, while junior students appear deeper immersed in the piracy scene. The greater the variety and proficiency of Internet use, the more likely users are to engage in online piracy.

Almost half of the students surveyed affirmed that they did "not feel guilty about pirating software" and a further 25% chose "undecided". 51.3% of all respondents did not consider piracy "improper" or "intrinsically wrong". Moreover, over a third believed that they would likely never be sanctioned for their copyright infringements committed and seemed unconcerned about possible sanctions, with well over half of the students indifferent to possible legal repercussions and fines.

Technological and ethical solutions recommended include: ethical reminders with an "OK" button indicating agreement with an "Acceptable Internet Use" (AIU) policy for campus networks; server-side license verification architectures; clear ethical codes delineating unethical and illegal computer behaviour and its consequences; informing students about regular occurrences of piracy detection; placing shortcuts to AIU policies and organisations dedicated to combating piracy; increasing recognition of intellectual property issues and relational interaction between universities and the IT industry, particularly with these developing software.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]