About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

browse comments: domain/trademark dispute

domain/trademark dispute
Ethan Anderson (toad@insync.net)
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 15:49:37 -0600

Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: lawp8016@nus.edu.sg: "WIPO RFC-3"
Previous message: dan_williams3rd@yahoo.com: "WIPO RFC-3"


Trademark registration is not a valid reason to limit domain registration
on the internet. Allowing trademark registration to override the
first-come-first-serve nature of domain registration will have several
limiting effects on domain name registration that are not necessarily in
the best interest of the world internet community.

Instances of individuals who register domain names simply to sell them to
the company that owns the trademark for that name are akin to extortion.
But if the individual (or even organization) that registers a domain simply
wishes to place a non-related or even related but non-damaging website at
that address, there is no reason for the trademark owner to become involved.

The practice of suing domain registrants simply becasue their domain is
similar or the same as a registered trademark will severely hinder
everyone's freedom to choose whatever domain they please. Domain names used
for defamation or dmaging purposes is obviously wrong. Domain registration
for the sole purpose of selling the domain name to the trademark holder is
also wrong. but if an individual or company simply wishes to put a website
at that address that causes no harm to the trademark holder, there should
be no reason for any legal action. if a trademark holder is that concerned
about their trademark that they so meticulously registered, perhaps they
should register the domain name as well. Once someone else has that domain
name, they should be required to pay fair market value for the name, not
just registration fees incurred by the current owner. There should be some
incentive for the current owner to forfeit the domain that they rightfully
registered.

Trademark registration does not equal domain registration.

Ethan Anderson
Houston, TX
toad@insync.net

Ethan Anderson
Insync Internet Services
713.407.7000 ext.142


Next message: lawp8016@nus.edu.sg: "WIPO RFC-3"
Previous message: dan_williams3rd@yahoo.com: "WIPO RFC-3"