About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 3524   document(s)s (0.08 sec)

Rows

1 - 20  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0737 for dealertrack.net, dealertracks.com, dealertracks.net, dealertraks.com html (12 KB)

with that speculative conclusion of Complainant is inherently to conclude that Respondent is guilty of a premeditated, willful and heinous fraud upon...this panel and process, a fraud in proposing a fictitious business plan as something realistic that the panel should rely upon as showing a legitimate...

2002-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1033 for bdousallpmiami.com pdf (127 KB)

purposes of email-based fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or...page 3 UDRP Panels have categorically held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity (e.g. impersonation or other types of fraud, as in this...

2022-05-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3591 for flyairlink4z.com html (10 KB)

evidence of the use of the Domain Name as part of an immigration fraud scheme in terms of which an employee of the Complainant was impersonated in an email...an employee of the Complainant for purposes of immigration fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6...

2021-12-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4757 for anythnklibraries.org pdf (143 KB)

September 29, 2022, and does not resolve to any active website. The Complainant has presented evidence of the Domain Name being used for email-based fraud...mark, has been used to impersonate a director of the Complainant for purposes of payment fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply substantively...

2023-03-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2861 for beamsuntry.com html (20 KB)

disputed domain name to impersonate Complainant in emails to Complainant’s affiliates and third-party business customers in an effort to perpetrate fraud...that Respondent registered and used the disputed domain name for purposes of impersonating Complainant and perpetrating fraud. Complainant claims that...

2019-04-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2716 for airport-s.org html (15 KB)

Complainant and the Domain Name has been used for fraud impersonating the Complainant. The Domain Name was registered and used in bad faith because the...Respondent has taken advantage of the Complainant’s well-known trade mark by using the Domain Name to perpetuate fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not...

2020-12-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2077 for eelkem.com html (9 KB)

Name has been used in an email fraud attempt. At the time of drafting the Decision, the Domain Name resolved to a web page with pay-per-click links. 5...Complainant’s trademark in order to attempt fraud. The Domain Name has been used together with the email address “[...]@eelkem.com”, an email address confusingly...

2020-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3713 for mlrova.com html (9 KB)

impersonate employees of the Complainant for purposes of payment fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6...( e.g., phishing, impersonation, or other types of fraud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests ( WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 2.13.1). The...

2022-01-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3478 for accesselliottmgmt.com pdf (137 KB)

Respondent cannot have rights or legitimate interests in respect of a domain name that has been registered for the purpose of business impersonation fraud. The...to confuse Internet users, investors and the Complainant’s employees, potentially by way of email fraud. The Complainant submits that the passive...

2023-10-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0257 for skechervipus.com html (8 KB)

photographs prominently. The Complainant adduced evidence of fraud, being a test purchase made at the website to which the Domain Name resolves showing that the...in bad faith given that the Domain Name has been used to impersonate the Complainant for the purposes of fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not...

2022-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0285 for haas-mond0mix.com html (12 KB)

of the Domain Name registration was to perpetrate fraud. The Complainant alleges that the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith...because the Domain Name was registered with the sole purpose of perpetrating fraud. B. The Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s...

2015-04-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1120 for bhpbilliton-petroleum.com html (11 KB)

Complainant suspects is an elaborate recruitment fraud. Complainant has submitted evidence that a number of prospective job seekers have contacted Complainant...for verification; the verification requests outline the alleged recruitment fraud. According to Complainant, Respondent is not making a legitimate...

2014-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1457 for allsaintsltd.com html (12 KB)

webmail records for the purpose of impersonating an officer of the Complainant and committing a fraud upon the Complainant. 5. Parties’ Contentions A...Respondent has relied upon trust in the Complainant’s brand to commit fraud. Consequently, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent could have no legitimate...

2019-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2903 for gtlaww.com pdf (139 KB)

currently does not resolve to any website. The disputed domain name was used to perpetuate fraud by sending emails to the Complainant’s client. 5. Parties...disputed domain name in furtherance of fraud and to display pay-per-click links to the Complainant’s competitors, which do not constitute bona fide or...

2022-10-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1792 for career-bat.com pdf (224 KB)

advance fee fraud scam. The Complainant can conceive of no circumstances in which the appropriation of its trademark within the disputed domain name for the...purposes of fraud (or, indeed, any other purpose) could be considered a bona fide use. page 3 The Complainant made the following contentions to establish...

2022-08-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0329 for nz-vfsglobal.com html (9 KB)

impersonate the Complainant for the purposes of email-based fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion...Panels have categorically held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity (e.g. impersonation or other types of fraud as in this case) can never...

2022-03-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0159 for migbankfraud.com html (25 KB)

complainant’s activities; it ends with “fraud”. The main element of the disputed domain name is identical with the Complainant’s registered trade name. The...present of the word “fraud” cannot eliminate this risk of confusion. No fraud whatsoever has been committed by the Complainant. Even if the Panel is not the...

2011-06-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1178 for ebay-delivery.com html (17 KB)

related to criminal activity associated with illegal money laundering and reshipping fraud (which will be explained later). Finally, Complainant’s lawyers...registered and uses the disputed domain name in bad faith. In particular, Complainant alleges that Respondent has engaged in “reshipping fraud” (or “parcel...

2015-09-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1641 for accenturellp.net html (25 KB)

a) Respondent registered the Domain Name on July 2, 2018 for the purpose of impersonating Complainant and perpetrating fraud. Respondent registered...Complainant’s affiliates and third party business customers in an effort to perpetrate fraud. Therefore, Complainant has no legitimate interests other than fraud...

2018-09-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1833 for algaecallead.com html (12 KB)

that complaint ( AlgaeCal Inc. v. AlgaeCal Fraud, WIPO Case No. D2013-1248 ), the disputed domain name was registered and a permanent re-direct was set...was found in the Panel decision concerning the domain name , AlgaeCal Inc. v AlgaeCal Fraud , WIPO Case No. D2013-1248 . Finally, the Complainant...

2014-01-08 - Case Details