Factual Background The Complainant is a bank that presently trades under the name "Bank Australia". The Complainant, or an earlier iteration, was founded in...1957 and prior to 2013 traded as "BankMecu" before it began a process of re-branding. The Complainant's relaunch under the "Bank Australia" name took...
2016-03-17 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2016-0489 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION ZB, N.A., dba California Bank & Trust v...Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp. Case No. D2016-0489 1. The Parties The Complainant is ZB, N.A., dba California Bank & Trust of Salt Lake City, Utah...
2016-04-27 - Case Details
Background The Complainant is a United Kingdom company founded in 2015 that provides clearing bank services. The Complainant is the owner of trademark...registrations for marks consisting of the words “clear bank” (the “CLEAR BANK Mark”) in various jurisdictions including in the United States applied for on August...
2019-08-22 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2017-1841 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Marathon Savings Bank v. Domain Manager...Affordable Webhosting, Inc., Advertising Case No. D2017-1841 1. The Parties Complainant is Marathon Savings Bank of Wausau, Wisconsin, United States of America...
2017-12-14 - Case Details
(specifically, credit card services and in general financial and banking services); - Greek registered trade mark TECHNOCARD – BANK OF ATTICA with logo...TECHNOCARD – BANK OF ATTICA with logo, registration no. 41535, dated September 25, 1998, in respect of goods and services in class 9 (in particular electronic...
2006-05-22 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2016-0454 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank v...Moniker Privacy Services / Shaun Hedges, Accueil Des Solutions Inc Case No. D2016-0454 1. The Parties The Complainant is Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank...
2016-05-11 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Bank of Alabama...v. Sumith Rodrigo & Co. Case No. D2004-0912 1. The Parties The Complainant is Bank of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America...
2004-12-16 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Al Hilal Bank v...Stephen Ranzini Case No. D2009-0133 1. The Parties Complainant is Al Hilal Bank of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, represented by Al Tamimi & Company...
2009-04-28 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2010-1846 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION African Bank Limited v. Domain Retail Park...Ltd, Ammar Al-Baldaw Case No. D2010-1846 1. The Parties The Complainant is African Bank Limited, Midrand, South Africa, represented by Bowman Gilfillan...
2011-03-07 - Case Details
dba Vectra Bank Colorado v. Proxy Protection LLC / Eric McGuire Case No. D2017-2303 1. The Parties Complainant is ZB, N.A., a national banking...association, dba Vectra Bank Colorado, of Denver, Colorado, United States of America (“United States” or “US”), and is represented by TechLaw Ventures, PLLC...
2018-02-20 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION BG Bank v. Kim...Hansen Case No. D2002-0643 1. The Parties The Complainant is BG Bank, a division of Danske Bank A/S, Holmens Kanal 2-12, 1092 Copenhagen, Denmark...
2002-09-03 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Finter Bank...Zurich v. Shumin Peng Case No. D2006-0432 1. The Parties The Complainant is Finter Bank Zurich, Z�rich, Switzerland, represented by CMS von Erlach...
2006-07-04 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-2226 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited...Homesafe Solutions Pty Ltd, Sandhurst Trustees Ltd, Community Sector Banking Pty Ltd and Rural Bank Limited v. Milton Wilde Case No. D2013-2226 1. The...
2014-04-25 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Habib Bank AG...Zurich v. Dave West Case No. D2004-0041 1. The Parties The Complainant is Habib Bank AG Zurich, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern...
2004-04-15 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-0450 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc. v...Brandi J Copp Case No. D2013-0450 1. The Parties The Complainant is The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc., London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and...
2013-05-23 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Boardwalk Bank v...Patrick Thorogood Case No. D2000-0213 1. The Parties Complainant is Boardwalk Bank, a New Jersey corporation with a place of business at 201 Shore Road...
2000-05-23 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-0275 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Ulster Bank Limited v. Franchise Ulster...Case No. D2013-0275 1. The Parties The Complainant is Ulster Bank Limited, Belfast, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by...
2013-05-02 - Case Details
f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P7RLS2'); WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Finter Bank...Zurich v. WangDaShi Case No. D2006-0044 1. The Parties The Complainant is Finter Bank Zurich, Z�rich, Switzerland, represented by CMS von Erlach Henrici...
2006-06-07 - Case Details
Complainant is a regional bank in the United States of America, with its headquarters in Novi, Michigan. The Complainant offers a range of banking services...using “Lotus Bank” in commerce in the United States of America “since at least August�2006.” On September�1,�2006, the Complainant filed a trademark...
2007-06-26 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2018-2875 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Amalgamated Bank v. Muslum Degin Case No...D2018-2875 1. The Parties The Complainant is Amalgamated Bank of New York, New York, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Boies...
2019-02-26 - Case Details