About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

WIPO Lex

WIPOLEX032-j

Back

People’s Court of Hanoi City, Viet Nam [2018]: P & CSPA v D Technology Development Support Joint Stock Company, Case No. 36/2018/KDTM-ST



This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2023 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

Session 2: Emerging Issues in Industrial Designs

People’s Court of Hanoi City, Viet Nam [2018]: P & CSPA v D Technology Development Support Joint Stock Company, Case No. 36/2018/KDTM-ST

Date of judgment: October 19, 2018
Issuing authority: People’s Court of Hanoi City
Level of the issuing authority: First Instance
Type of procedure: Judicial (Civin( �br> Subject matter: Industrial Designs; Enforcement of IP and Related Laws
Plaintiff: P & C.S.P.A.
Defendant: D Technology Development Support Joint Stock Company
Keywords: Industrial design, Infringement

Basic facts: The plaintiff is an Italian company and a leading global manufacturer of two-wheeled vehicles. It is the owner of Industrial Design Patent No. 20652, officially granted by the National Office of Intellectual Property of Viet Nam under Decision No. 11839/QD-SHTT dated February 27, 2015, for the product design of the “P” scooter series.

The defendant has registered its business and been licensed to carry out the production of motorbikes, and to do business in the Vietnamese market. It is the registered owner of a number of trademarks relating to its motorbike business, including for product “D”, an electric motorbike. The defendant wished to expand its business to also include electric motorbikes and bicycles. However, before proceeding with the production and trading of electric motorbikes and bicycles, the defendant requested an appraisal of the industrial design of the new products that it intended to produce and sell, from the Viet Nam Intellectual Property Research Institute (VIPRI).

On September 7, 2016, VIPRI issued its industrial property assessment No. KD054-16YC/KLGD, concluding that the design of the proposed electric motorbikes, as shown in the appraisal documents submitted for inspection, are not copies of any registered industrial designs for motorbikes, mopeds, scooters, bicycles, or electric motorbikes in Vietnam.

On January 13, 2017, at the request of the plaintiff, VIPRI issued industrial property assessment No. KD001-17YC/KLGD, concluding that the electric motorbike design produced by the defendant infringes the plaintiff’s registered industrial design No. 20652.

Accordingly, the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant for infringement of its registered industrial design in the “P” scooter series.

Held: The People’s Court of Hanoi City found in favor of the plaintiff.

Relevant holdings in relation to emerging issues in industrial designs: The Court ordered,inter alia, that the defendant:

1. Cease its unlawful use of the plaintiff’s industrial design, as protected under Industrial Design Patent No. 20652, and that the defendant and its affiliates cease use of any designs that are not significantly different from the plaintiff’s protected design;

2. Pay damages in the amount of VND 217,584,500, as compensation to the plaintiff for the following amounts:

a. Legal fees of VND 200,000,000;
b. The cost incurred to buy a model car for inspection, amounting to VND 7,227,000;
c. The fee for obtaining a certificate of the bailiff, of VND 3,960,000; and
d. The fee for obtaining an industrial property appraisal, of VND 6,397,500;

3. Carry out procedures at the Registry Department to cancel the Vehicle Type Quality Certificate for the infringing product;

4. Remove the infringing parts of the motorbikes and destroy these; and

5. Publish a public apology for having infringed on the plaintiff’s intellectual property rights in three consecutive issues of the Thanh Nien newspaper.

Relevant legislation:
Article 126, Article 202, Article 204, and Article 205 of Law No. 50/2005/QH11 of November 29, 2005, on Intellectual Property