关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 工业品外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 工业品外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 与产权组织合作 问责制 专利 商标 工业品外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 经济学 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 COVID-19支持 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 职位空缺 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

WIPO Lex

WIPOLEX032-j

返回

People’s Court of Hanoi City, Viet Nam [2018]: P & CSPA v D Technology Development Support Joint Stock Company, Case No. 36/2018/KDTM-ST



This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2023 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

Session 2: Emerging Issues in Industrial Designs

People’s Court of Hanoi City, Viet Nam [2018]: P & CSPA v D Technology Development Support Joint Stock Company, Case No. 36/2018/KDTM-ST

Date of judgment: October 19, 2018
Issuing authority: People’s Court of Hanoi City
Level of the issuing authority: First Instance
Type of procedure: Judicial (Civin( �br> Subject matter: Industrial Designs; Enforcement of IP and Related Laws
Plaintiff: P & C.S.P.A.
Defendant: D Technology Development Support Joint Stock Company
Keywords: Industrial design, Infringement

Basic facts: The plaintiff is an Italian company and a leading global manufacturer of two-wheeled vehicles. It is the owner of Industrial Design Patent No. 20652, officially granted by the National Office of Intellectual Property of Viet Nam under Decision No. 11839/QD-SHTT dated February 27, 2015, for the product design of the “P” scooter series.

The defendant has registered its business and been licensed to carry out the production of motorbikes, and to do business in the Vietnamese market. It is the registered owner of a number of trademarks relating to its motorbike business, including for product “D”, an electric motorbike. The defendant wished to expand its business to also include electric motorbikes and bicycles. However, before proceeding with the production and trading of electric motorbikes and bicycles, the defendant requested an appraisal of the industrial design of the new products that it intended to produce and sell, from the Viet Nam Intellectual Property Research Institute (VIPRI).

On September 7, 2016, VIPRI issued its industrial property assessment No. KD054-16YC/KLGD, concluding that the design of the proposed electric motorbikes, as shown in the appraisal documents submitted for inspection, are not copies of any registered industrial designs for motorbikes, mopeds, scooters, bicycles, or electric motorbikes in Vietnam.

On January 13, 2017, at the request of the plaintiff, VIPRI issued industrial property assessment No. KD001-17YC/KLGD, concluding that the electric motorbike design produced by the defendant infringes the plaintiff’s registered industrial design No. 20652.

Accordingly, the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant for infringement of its registered industrial design in the “P” scooter series.

Held: The People’s Court of Hanoi City found in favor of the plaintiff.

Relevant holdings in relation to emerging issues in industrial designs: The Court ordered,inter alia, that the defendant:

1. Cease its unlawful use of the plaintiff’s industrial design, as protected under Industrial Design Patent No. 20652, and that the defendant and its affiliates cease use of any designs that are not significantly different from the plaintiff’s protected design;

2. Pay damages in the amount of VND 217,584,500, as compensation to the plaintiff for the following amounts:

a. Legal fees of VND 200,000,000;
b. The cost incurred to buy a model car for inspection, amounting to VND 7,227,000;
c. The fee for obtaining a certificate of the bailiff, of VND 3,960,000; and
d. The fee for obtaining an industrial property appraisal, of VND 6,397,500;

3. Carry out procedures at the Registry Department to cancel the Vehicle Type Quality Certificate for the infringing product;

4. Remove the infringing parts of the motorbikes and destroy these; and

5. Publish a public apology for having infringed on the plaintiff’s intellectual property rights in three consecutive issues of the Thanh Nien newspaper.

Relevant legislation:
Article 126, Article 202, Article 204, and Article 205 of Law No. 50/2005/QH11 of November 29, 2005, on Intellectual Property