www.webcontents.com) of La Grange, Illinois, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dotster, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sysya Software Solutions of Guidy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-11-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Adam Bay of Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.
3. ...Finally, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and used in bad faith. The Complainant notes that the Respondent has made no bona fide use of the domain name. ...
2010-07-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jackie Graves, ChangeMyRate.com A Mortgage Corporation, United States (hereinafter “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Value-Domain Com of Osaka, Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH dba domaindiscount24.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-08-09 - Case Details
The Complainant filed an
amendment to the Complaint on August 18, 2025
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Further
factors including the nature of the domain name, the chosen top-level domain, any use of the domain name,
or any respondent pattern, may obviate a respondent’s claim not to have been aware of the complainant’s
mark.”
...
2025-10-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Adolfo Aragon, Far East Russia Aircraft Servcies Inc, Houston, Texas, United States of America, represented by Bracewell & Giuliani LLP of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with DSTR Acquisition VII, LLC d/b/a Dotregistrar.com.
3. ...The Respondent charges the Complainant with attempted reverse domain-name hijacking.
6. Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy provides that in order to divest the Respondent of a disputed domain name, the Complainant must demonstrate each of the following:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2008-11-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is matthew Larson, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Finally, the Respondent indicates that his choice of the dispute domain name was based on keyword
relevance and consumer familiarity, and his willingness to cooperate by altering the primary branding or
domain name of his web shop, while retaining the disputed domain name as a redirect domain name.
...
2025-10-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Edward Lineman, United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not using the disputed domain name for a bona fide use – instead it seems that the disputed domain name may be part of a fraudulent scheme. ...
2020-02-24 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The marks
remain clearly recognizable in each disputed domain name. The addition of the term “win” does not prevent
a finding of confusing similarity. WIPO Overview 3.1, section 1.8.
...
2026-08-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ore Net Marketing of Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2015-03-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Watson Lan of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the confirmation satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-12-13 - Case Details
Respondent has not made use of the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. The disputed domain name resolves to a parked page. ...The Panel notes that the disputed domain name resolves to a parked webpage that is tantamount to “passive holding” of the disputed domain name. ...
2016-09-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shixiao Ai, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2022-02-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Privacy Protection Foundation, the Netherlands / Kestutis Mazeika, Lithuania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends, in summary, that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, and that the Respondent registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith to attract visitors and generate traffic to the website at the Domain Name.
...
2021-11-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xianbin Chen of Minnesota, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the “Domain Name”), is registered with Melbourne IT Ltd. ...Thus, by his use of the Complainant’s trade mark in the Domain Name he has been attracting Internet users to his website by a deceit. This is not a bona fide use of the Domain Name.
...
2011-05-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Marq Quarius, 1 LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent states that he has never used the disputed domain name for its “traditional meaning”. He
says that he registered the disputed domain name in March 1997, before the Complainant was using a
similar domain name, after three family pets died, at his mother’s suggestion. ...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
Respondent is Phil Trackleberg of Temecula, California, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-11-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Tsi Nkwenti Collins, Cameroon (hereinafter, “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The CEVA trademark is clearly recognizable in the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark.
...
2022-02-23 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent is located in Panama.
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on January 11, 2019.
D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name has been used in respect of a parking page containing sponsored links to various banking, financial services, and insurance related websites (the “Website”).
5. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Marks, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2019-03-14 - Case Details