About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 63210   document(s)s (0.081 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50641 - 50660  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0384 for begaprice.com html (9 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...Subsequent to receipt of the “cease and desist” letter, Respondent also offered to sell the domain name to Complainant for EUR19,530. Complaint, Annex 9. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the domain name consists of Complainant's trademark BEGA, which is the dominant and distinctive feature of the domain name. ...

2009-05-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0243 for cincinnatibellwireless.com html (10 KB)

Box 21, Telok Intan, Perak, 36009, Malaysia, hereinafter the "Respondent".   2. Domain Name and Registrar The domain name in dispute is . The registrar for the disputed domain name is iholdings d/b/a DotRegistrar.com, 13205 SW 137th Avenue, Suite #133, Miami, Florida 33186, United States of America.   3. ...The domain name was and is registered and used in bad faith. Respondent had to have been aware of Complainant’s trade mark when registering the domain name at issue. ...

2002-06-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1394 for cornerbakery.rest html (9 KB)

The Respondent is Ali Rıza Esin, Globe Restaurants, Global Gıda Tic. Tur. Ltd. of Antalya, Turkey. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with DNC Holdings, Inc. ...The Respondent is located in Antalya, Turkey, and the Domain Name was registered on July 24, 2014. The website at the Domain Name displays advertising links. 5. ...

2016-09-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1563 for ellekidz.com html (8 KB)

The Respondent is Shruti Shah, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Discussion and Findings For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2021-07-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2207 for eneleled.top html (9 KB)

The Respondent is See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States of America / Anton Bylah, Ukraine. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its ENEL trademarks, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, and that the Respondent registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith. ...

2021-09-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-0761 for contenful.com html (9 KB)

The Respondent is Jan Everno, The Management Group II, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Skykomishdomains.com LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The disputed domain name has been used for fraudulent purposes. The fact that the disputed domain name constitutes typosquatting is a further indication of a lack of legitimate interest. ...

2020-06-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2020-0062 for valdoxan.co html (8 KB)

The Respondent is Sarah Hampton, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent must have registered the disputed domain name in order to sell it to the Complainant. The disputed domain name is being used in bad faith as the disputed domain name resolves to a website which contains PPC links. ...

2020-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-0629 for omis.com pdf (428 KB)

The Respondent is MediaWorld Advertising International FZE, United Arab Emirates. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Key- 3. Procedural History 2026. ...The comparison of the disputed domain name to the Complainant's trademark simply requires a visual and aural comparison of the disputed domain name to the proven trademarks. ...

2026-07-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2238 for ibmcs.com pdf (206 KB)

The Respondent is mehmet sahin, Türkiye. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2023-08-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DTV2001-0007 for esmas.tv html (32 KB)

Respondents are Autosya SA de CV and Enrique de la Campa ("Respondents"), whose address, as provided by the Registrar, is at Plaza Popocateptl No. 41 Depto. 2, Colonia Condesa, Mexico City, Mexico 06140.   2.The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name at issue is (the "Domain Name") which domain name is registered with dotTV Corporation International ("dotTV"), in Los Angeles, California, United States of America. dotTV has voluntarily adopted the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or the "UDRP") and has selected the World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "WIPO Center") as a dispute resolution service provider.   3.Procedural History 3.1A Complaint was submitted electronically to the WIPO Center on May 15, 2001, and the signed was received on March 20, 2001. ...The phrase is not descriptive of a specific service or product. 4.7.Respondents registered the domain name at issue on May 16, 2000. Complaint, Annex A. 4.8On October 27, 2000, using the contact information Respondents had provided to the registrar, Complainants’ counsel sent a Cease and Desist letter requesting the transfer of the domain name. ...

2001-07-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1745 for 2ets.org html (9 KB)

The Respondent is Sameh Abd Elmonem, Infc of Mansoura, Egypt. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <2ets.org> is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2017-11-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1829 for sodexxo.com html (8 KB)

The Respondent is May Bae, United Kingdom. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name. The Respondent cannot establish rights in the Domain Name as it has not made any use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...

2020-09-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1982 for elliptiparlighting.com html (9 KB)

The Respondent is BlueHostDomains of Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with DSTR Acquisition VII, LLC d/b/a Dotregistrar.com. 3. ...The Complainant contends that the Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ELLIPTIPAR trademark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2011-02-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-2227 for cibankonline.com html (8 KB)

The Respondent is Paulo of Dijon, France. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot, LLC. ...The Complainant further submits that there could be no legitimate use of the Domain Name by the Respondent and that his only other purpose might be to sell the Domain Name to the Complainant. ...

2011-02-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0774 for starky.com html (9 KB)

Complainant Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is virtually identical to Complainant's registered marks, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...Such activities do not constitute bona fide use of the domain name. Accordingly, the Panel finds that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...

2010-07-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0893 for unionfenosa.net html (9 KB)

Sydey Hussain of CPIC NET, who resides at 15, 5th Street, Closter, NJ 07624 USA (the "Respondent").   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name at issue is "unionfenosa.net". The registrar is register.com, Inc. ...b) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the contested domain name and is not making any use of the domain name in connection with any non-commercial activity. ...

2000-10-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4634 for fr-sonepar.com, fr-sonepar.info, fr-sonepar.online pdf (155 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...Secondly, it is established that when someone registers a domain name, he represents and warrants to the registrar that, to his knowledge, the registration of the domain name will not infringe the rights of any third party. ...

2026-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2358 for pfizernear.com html (8 KB)

Respondent is Dale Leach of Bonita Springs, Florida, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar"). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2018-02-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0099 for betwaykings.com html (8 KB)

The Respondent is onuma mongsupeng, Thailand (hereinafter, “Respondent”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its BETWAY mark; Complainant alleges that Respondent no rights or legitimate in respect to the disputed domain name; Complainant asserts that Respondent’s domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2021-03-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0352 for nationalgridonline.com html (8 KB)

Respondent is Undisclosed customer 0129436546 of Toronto, Ontario / ICS Inc. of Gran Cayman, Cayman Islands, Overseas Territory of the UK. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2012-05-04 - Case Details