The Respondent is Oneandone Private Registration, 1&1 Internet Inc., United States / Phan Thanh Sang, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 IONOS Inc. ...The Complainant owns trademark registrations for the FACEBOOK mark that predate the registration of the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name incorporates the disputed domain name in its entirety. The inclusion of the additional word “stable” does not eliminate the confusing similarity.
...
2019-09-19 - Case Details
Respondent is Hung-Yen Cheng of Bakersfield, California, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-03-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is SWX Teleinformatics Services, of Zurich, Switzerland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”)
is registered with Tucows.
3. ...The Respondent makes no legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name.
3. The Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant’s name and trademarks. ...
2007-04-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Although at the time of the Complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to a blank page, the First Respondent engaged by email with the Complainant concerning the transfer of the disputed domain name. ...
2014-08-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alex Tembel of Laval, Quebec, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Super Registry Ltd (the "Registrar").
3. ...A message inviting Internet users to rent the disputed domain name is also displayed.
5. Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant's COLISSIMO registered trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests whatsoever with respect to the disputed domain name; and that the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2015-08-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yashwanth Iyer, Ireland, self-represented.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names (the first disputed domain name) and
(the second disputed domain name) are registered with
GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As noted above, the second disputed domain name also incorporates
third-party trademarks. Following established panel practice, the transfer of this disputed domain
name shall be ordered without prejudice to the rights of the owners of the trademarks ALPINE and F1
in this disputed domain name. ...
2026-08-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bill Atkinson, United States of America (“Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This type of illegitimate use of a domain name has acquired the Internet name of “phishing”, the use of a domain name in an attempt to “catch” an unsuspecting Internet user into providing funds or other items of value to the domain name registrant in the belief that the user is providing those funds or items to a legitimate business of that name or similar name. ...
2020-12-09 - Case Details
Núñez, Patentes
y Marcas, S.L., Spain.
The Respondent is Domain Admin, E-Promote, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-03-02 - Case Details
Respondent is Jianfeng Wu, www.Juming.com of Heifei, China (hereinafter "Respondent").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DomainCreek LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2018-03-02 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ENTSCHEIDUNG DER Schiedskommission
DPDgroup International Services GmbH & Co. KG. v. Name Redacted
Verfahrensnr. DEU2021-0005
1. Die Parteien
Beschwerdeführerin ist DPDgroup International Services GmbH & Co. ...Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Article B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
- the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or EU-law;
- the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
6. ...
2021-06-02 - Case Details
The Complainant maintains that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name. The Complainant states that the Respondent, as an individual, has never been
known by the disputed domain name or any name similar to the disputed domain name, and has never
acquired any trademark rights in the disputed domain name. ...Rights or Legitimate Interests
According to the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed
domain name, because the Respondent has never been known by the disputed domain name and has never
acquired any trademark rights in the disputed domain name. ...
2023-01-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Linda Carola, United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Discussion and Findings
According to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, for this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2020-10-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States of America (“USA”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com Pty Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Website also contains a “Buy this Domain” link.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2020-01-22 - Case Details
Where a disputed domain name is being passively held and it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to conceive of a legitimate use of the disputed domain name to which the disputed domain name could be put, UDRP panels have found that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. The Panel notes the nature of the disputed domain name and finds that in the present case, where Respondent has not even asserted that a legitimate use of the disputed domain name can be made, that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
7. ...
2020-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kadeer Razeen, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-01-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Optura Pty Ltd. of Wishart, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and that Respondent registered and used the domain name in bad faith, in an attempt to attract Internet users to the domain name based on confusion with Complainant’s mark.
...
2011-09-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Laurentiu Cristinel of Giurgiu, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...In light of the distinctive nature of the Domain Name, it is difficult for the Panel to conceive of any legitimate use to which the Respondent could put the Domain Name. ...
2017-11-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gao Yang of Shanghai, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DropCatch.com 1352 LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent was never known by the domain name. The aim of registering the domain name was financial gain as the domain name is offered for sale. ...
2018-08-02 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There is no evidence that the Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired unregistered rights. There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2019-04-23 - Case Details
Complaint, Annex 5.
Respondent registered the disputed domain name on July 17, 2019. Complaint, Annex 1. Respondent has listed the disputed domain name on the domain name marketplace Sedo.com, offering the disputed domain name for sale for a minimum offer of USD 500. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
Respondent has listed the disputed domain name for sale at an online site that serves as a marketplace for domain names. Complainant alleges that disputed domain name redirects to Complainant’s website. ...
2020-01-17 - Case Details