The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Respondent
The Respondent submits that the disputed domain name is being used to show how LEGO may be used to create robotics creations.
According to the Respondent, there is no risk of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s domain name as it is clear from the text on the website that he is a LEGO fan.
...
2006-05-05 - Case Details
Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in dispute is .
The registrar for the disputed domain name is Dotster Inc., 11807 NE 99th Street, Suite 1100, Vancouver, WA, 98682, United States of America.
3. ...The domain name was and is registered and used in bad faith.
TELIA is a well-known mark, and Respondent is evidently aware that the domain name corresponds to this trademark.
...
2002-05-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
In addressing the Complainant’s request, the Panel will consider whether (i) the disputed domain names or
corresponding websites are subject to common control; and (ii) the consolidation would be fair and equitable
to all Parties. ...
2024-08-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is oleidun of Chongqing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2015-11-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bohdan Artemchuk of Lutsk, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As such, it merely indicates there may be something of interest about the subject of the distinctive part of a domain name. Accordingly, the gTLD “.wtf” does not serve to distinguish the Domain Name from the F5 mark, which is the distinctive component of the Domain Name.
...
2017-05-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kissi Kissi of Sundernagar, Himachal Pradesh, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-05-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Leon Thomas, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant’s mark is at the beginning of the disputed domain name, thereby drawing attention to that component. The disputed domain name is therefore confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks. ...
2021-02-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is alex martins, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. It submits that the disputed domain name comprises a deliberate misspelling of the Complainant’s name and trademark and that the Respondent has used the disputed domain name for the purpose of an email “phishing” scam. ...
2020-09-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shanghai Vaneage.ltd of Shanghai, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to the Registrar, the Respondent registered the disputed domain name on July 6, 2011, but the disputed domain name was first registered on July 10, 2010. ...
2013-11-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sanyi Vajai, Bucuresti, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom.
3. ...The Complainants contend that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name. The Complainants declare that the Respondent has registered the domain name only with an intent to sell the domain name.
...
2006-05-18 - Case Details
The Center verified
that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental
Rules").
...The Panel observes at the outset of this proceeding that many of the facts
alleged in the Complaint are irrelevant to the question whether Respondent registered
and used the disputed domain name in bad faith. The disputed domain name was
registered by Respondent on March 3, 1997. A finding of abusive domain
name registration and use requires that a respondent "registered"
(and used) the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2003-05-09 - Case Details
The registrar-confirmed registrant of record for the disputed domain name is Laksh Internet Solutions Private Limited. The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Respondents are not using the domain name in a bona fide manner. The domain name resolves to a click-through-revenue or “pay per click” website. ...
2008-09-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Moshood Olatunji, Sunminers Nigeria Limited, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Whogohost Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the BLUM trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the BLUM trademark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2024-03-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domainsecrecy.net of Providence, Utah, United States of America / Jonathan Bachir,
self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2018-02-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is zhangjin of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Guangdong JinWanBang Technology Investment Co., Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-01-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ayr Sha of Kazan, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-01-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Above.com Domain Privacy of Beaumaris, Victoria, Australia / Strata Services of Hong Kong, SAR of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc. ...The Panel is convinced that the registration of the disputed domain name was in bad faith.
The Respondent’s bad faith use of the disputed domain name is also evident. ...
2012-12-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Infomax, Ltd. of Bridgeman Downs, New Zealand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”)
is registered with Fabulous.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
In accordance with the Policy, paragraph 4(a), to succeed in this proceeding, the Complainant must prove (a) that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which it has rights, and (b) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, and (c) that the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2006-09-20 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...For example, as cited by the Complainant, in Spirig Pharma AG v Whois privacy services, provided by
Domain/Protect / Alexander Zinovjev, WIPO Case No. D2014-1612, the only use of the disputed domain
name was as an offer to sell. ...
2022-09-22 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name is .
2.2 The registrar of the disputed domain name is BulkRegister.com with a business
address at 7 East Redwood Street, Third Floor, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA.
3. ...A domain name is confusingly similar
to a trademark for purposes of the Policy when the domain name includes the
trademark regardless of the other terms in the domain name. ...
2001-07-16 - Case Details