Factual Background
Complainant is the owner of the domain name which has been registered since 1994. The domain name links to an active website promoting Complainant’s services and products.
...The disputed domain name is therefore confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. Both the domain name and Complainant’s mark are dominated by the identical word “mantech”.
...
2019-05-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It contends that it “registered the domain name
in order to distract domain grabbers from registering this domain name and using
it in bad faith with respect to 01058 Telecom GmbH”.
6. ...
2004-09-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Privacy Protection Service Inc., Bellevue, Washington
, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <1-xenical.com> is registered with Gr8t Names.
3. ...Such use of the disputed domain name is not a fair use of Complainant’s mark. Respondent has offered no reasons why it believes it has a right to use, or interests in, the domain name. ...
2006-11-06 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (‘the Domain Name’) is registered with Media Elite Holdings Limited dba Register Matrix (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-12-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Media Elite Holdings Limited dba Register Matrix (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-12-17 - Case Details
Der Gesuchsgegner ist Oussama Rabi, Schweiz.
2. Streitiger Domain-Name
Gegenstand des Verfahrens ist der Domain-Name (nachfolgend der “Domainname”).
...Dezember 2023
EXPERTENENTSCHEID
Galenica AG v. Oussama Rabi
Verfahren Nr. DCH2023-0021
2. Streitiger Domain-Name
3. Verfahrensablauf
4. Sachverhalt
5. ...
2024-01-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent is not sponsored by or
affiliated with the Complainant in any way.
The disputed domain names currently direct Internet users to domain name listings for sale on a domain
name marketplace. ...
2024-12-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Su Ping of Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-04-08 - Case Details
The disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s trademark and the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.video”.
The Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name. The Respondent is clearly using the disputed domain name for a commercial purpose, obtaining revenue from pay-per-click links to the Complainant’s competitors. ...
2016-07-27 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...This may have been done to lend legitimacy to the disputed domain name. In any event, by not using the disputed domain name, the Respondent is effectively passively holding the disputed domain name.
...
2015-12-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mau Lio of Nansha, Guangdong Sheng, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with TurnCommerce, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-04-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo of Bucharest, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Tucows Inc. ...It is likely that the Respondent's intention for registering the Domain Name has been to use it for financial gain, evidenced by the fact that the Domain Name directs Internet users to a parking page which is aimed at generating revenues, and that the Respondent has put the Domain Name for sale. ...
2017-03-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ilaria Passon of London, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 1&1 Internet SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on October 11, 2016. Until at least January 2017, the Domain Name did not resolve to an active website. ...
2017-08-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tien Nguyen, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. The Domain Name was set up to reach a landing page offering the Domain Name for sale for USD 50,000, a sum far in excess of the costs of registration. ...
2021-07-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Namecock Cheapli, Greece.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Domain Name is not a dictionary term but is distinctive. The Complainant has not authorized the Respondent’s use of the Domain Name.
...
2021-09-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Joseph, Joseph Thompson, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent cannot establish rights in the Domain Name as it has not made use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering. ...
2020-09-18 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
In addition to the mimicry of Complainant’s trademark of long-standing in a portion of the disputed domain name, the disputed domain name is virtually identical to a domain name registered by Complainant more than a year before Respondent’s registration, the domain name . ...
2021-01-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States / Anna Hazare, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2021-02-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Texas International Property Associates of Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("the Domain Name") is registered with Fabulous.com.
3. ...The Complainants have not authorised the Respondent to use or register the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name as has no legitimate right or interest in the Domain Name.
...
2011-01-24 - Case Details