The Respondent is bobr bobr of Afghanistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2009-09-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Simon Ip of Drums, Pennsylvania, US representing himself and recently represented by Liu & Shields, LLP, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The only reason for Respondent to register the Domain Name in his name is to sell the Domain Name back to YKK.
The only conceivable reason for Respondent to register the Domain Name under his own name is so that he would control the Domain Name and profit from the goodwill and reputation of Murko and the MURKO Mark, and/or sell the Domain Name back to YKK. ...
2014-01-20 - Case Details
The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
While the overall burden of proof in UDRP proceedings is on the complainant, panels have recognized that
proving a respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in a domain name may result in the often impossible
task of “proving a negative”, requiring information that is often primarily within the knowledge or control of the
respondent. ...
2023-11-20 - Case Details
The Respondents' names have been redacted.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Respondents are not commonly known by the disputed domain name.
The website, to which the disputed domain name resolved, has been used for fraudulent activities by the Respondents. ...
2017-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is xingxiang qian, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent
The Respondent is apparently an individual resident in China.
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on March 29, 2021.
D. The Website at the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name has been used by the Respondent in respect of a Chinese language website with commercial links to pornographic and gambling websites (the “Website”).
5. ...
2021-08-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Adrian Reyes, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB
3. ...In fact, the
disputed domain name was used for the purpose of a fraudulent email scheme. The Respondent is not
commonly known by the disputed domain name.
...
2026-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc, Panama. / DAI CA, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant promotes the Judge Judy program through the domain name , registered on July 20, 1996.
The disputed domain name was registered on February 1, 2020. ...
2020-08-10 - Case Details
Complainant owns the domain name .
The disputed domain name, , was registered on August 28, 2008. ...There is no evidence that Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name or is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name.
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2013-01-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is ML, Matt Leavsi, Catanzaro, Italy: WhoisGuard, Los Angeles, California, United States of America (the United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("the Domain Name") is registered with eNom.
3. ...The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the trade mark of the Complainant.
No licence has been given for the brand ACCUTANE to be used in the Domain Name. ...
2012-05-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nicos Panayiou, Registrant [2791749] of Nicosia, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC. ...From 2001 to 2007 the Domain Name pointed to a web page indicating that it was for sale. The Domain Name is currently directed to a Yahoo web page.
5. ...
2010-07-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tian Qing of Tiananmen, Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-05-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Keyword Marketing, Inc., Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Capitoldomains, LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2008-02-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ben Williams, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2007-10-18 - Case Details
Complainant has registered and is using SAFEMAIL as a trademark. This trademark is identical to the domain name at issue.
The Respondent has no legitimate interests in the domain name at issue.
...On the other hand, the fact that Respondent’s company name is identical to the domain name at issue is a possible indication that Respondent had a legitimate interest in the domain name et issue at the time of registration or later. ...
2003-04-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2021-10-19 - Case Details
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name in that Respondent has never been authorized to use either of Respondent’s trademarks, and that Respondent is not using the domain name to make any noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...Panels have found that when a domain name consists of a Second-Level Domain that corresponds exactly to a trademark and is registered in a gTLD, in this case “.date”, the disputed domain name is identical to the trademark in question. ...
2018-10-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendments to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy sets forth three elements that must be established by a complainant to merit a finding that a respondent has engaged in abusive domain name registration and use and to obtain relief. These elements are that:
(i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights; and
(ii) respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2014-04-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains by Proxy LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America / Peter Smith of Douglas, Isle of Man, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the "Domain Name"), is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on October 31, 2014 and appears to resolve to the Complainant's website connected to its domain name. ...
2015-12-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Badboi ot, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant argues that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name. The Complainant asserts that it has not found any evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2020-07-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to the Complaint, the Respondent registered the Domain Name on December 12, 2019. At the time of drafting the Decision, the Domain Name redirected to an error page.
5. ...
2020-12-11 - Case Details