C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on August 22, 2017.
D. The Website at the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name is resolved to a website which provides sponsored links to websites related to company incorporation, education services and stock trading (the "Website").
5. ...The disputed domain name also, incidentally, incorporates the entirety of the Domain Name, and the entirety of the Complainant's name.
...
2017-11-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is SureSupport Privacy, SureSupport Privacy Service, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2019-12-18 - Case Details
Respondent is Sheetal Parekh of Corona, California, U.S. and C. Parekh of Artesia, California, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The next day, August 2, 2011, Respondent registered the Domain Name. Complainant objected to Respondent’s use of the Domain Name, asserting its trademark rights. ...
2013-11-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is E-Promote of Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America ("United States").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-07-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “irDRP”), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...As of August 23, 2017, the disputed domain name redirected to the Complainant’s website.
The disputed domain name does not currently resolve to a website.
5. ...
2021-02-02 - Case Details
Fred Norris, an individual, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name is .
2.2 The registrar of the disputed domain name is BulkRegister.com, Inc., having a corporate administration office located in Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3. ...In addition to acquiring in bad faith, Respondent is also using the domain name in bad faith. By maintaining a domain name registration identical to the service mark, Respondent has prevented Complainant from registering its service mark as a ".com" domain name."
...
2003-04-30 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Panel finds the second element of the Policy has been established.
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
page 6
C. ...
2026-09-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...This incorporates the Complainant’s corporate name and
trademark INFOSYS.
INFOSYS is an invented word. The Complainant has no relationship with the Respondent and has never
authorized the Respondent to use the disputed domain name or any other domain name.
...
2024-02-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Oleg Osinskyi, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-08-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lu Lan of Shangai, People's Republic of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Above.com, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-03-22 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The test for identity or confusing
similarity typically involves a side-by-side comparison of the domain name, to assess whether the trademark
is recognizable within the domain name.
In this case, the Disputed Domain Names are composed of two elements: (1) the word “HEETS” followed by
(2) the words “AMBER” or “BRONZE.” ...
2023-04-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rick Matthews, Uganda.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name’) is registered with Web4Africa Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-12-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It is the owner of trademark registrations which are identical or confusingly similar to the disputed domain name.
2. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
3. ...
2018-07-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Koval Dmitrii, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The use of punctuation such as hyphens and a gTLD, such as “.biz”, does not serve to distinguish the Domain Name from the Complainant’s mark, which is clearly recognisable in the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Panel holds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar for the purpose of the Policy to a mark in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2020-11-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is New Horizons Louisville of Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-05-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, RegistrarAds, Inc of Vancouver, Washington, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with DSTR Acquisition VII, LLC d/b/a Dotregistrar.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In accordance with paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy, this constitutes evidence of registration and use of the Domain Name in bad faith. There is no reason to believe that the Domain Name was registered with any other intent. ...
2008-10-14 - Case Details
page 2
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant requests the consolidation of the Complaint against the multiple
disputed domain name registrants pursuant to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules.
The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
...
2024-09-16 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Factual Background
According to the available WhoIs information, the disputed domain name was “created” on December 17, 1998.
The Complainant has requested that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
5. ...
2012-01-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alice Chan of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-12-20 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In proceedings under the Policy, the identity of the holder of a domain name
registration is indicated by the registrar with which the respective domain name is registered. ...
2023-06-27 - Case Details