[…] Many such cases involve the respondent’s use of
the domain name to send deceptive emails, e.g., to obtain sensitive or confidential personal information from
prospective job applicants, or to solicit payment of fraudulent invoices by the complainant’s actual or
prospective customers” (in this respect see, for example, Sony Corporation v. WhoisGuard Protected,
WhoisGuard, Inc. / David Grant, WIPO Case No. D2020-3162; Haas Food Equipment GmbH v. ...
2022-03-09 - Case Details
The Complainant’s processors serve
as the Central Processing Unit (“CPU”) for 225 billion devices worldwide, including mobile phones f rom
Nokia, Sony Ericsson, and Samsung, as well as laptops, tablets, televisions, and other electronic products.
...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
His trademark belongs to the level below suggestive and cannot restrict anyone or
any company from using letters such as common/commonapp/common application. This The trademark is
neither as Sony nor Disney, because common and application are words commonly used by human beings.
In essence, a suggestive-level trademark cannot bind others to use the words in it.
...
2023-03-02 - Case Details
This constructive notice suggests that Respondent
acted with opportunistic bad faith in registering the Disputed Domain Name. Complainant refers to See Sony
Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sin, Eonmok, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007; Nintendo of Am. Inc. v. Pokemon, WIPO
Case No. ...
2024-12-06 - Case Details
The Domain Name consists
of two well-known trademarks, "SONY" and "PHILIPS", and
the Complainant has rights in the "PHILIPS" part. Although the Domain
Name is not identical to Complainant’s mark, this Panel concludes that
it is confusingly similar to "PHILIPS" as there is a considerable
risk that the average Internet user would at least (wrongly) assume that there
exist some kind of business relationship or other affiliation between the disputed
Domain Name, the domain name holder (Respondent) and the Complainant.
...
2002-07-08 - Case Details
D2000-0493, Rollerblade, Inc. c. Chris McCrady,
Caso OMPI No. D2000-0429 y Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (Sony Corporation) c. Inja, Kil,
Caso OMPI No. D2000-1409).
Que incorporar una marca en su totalidad dentro de un nombre de dominio puede considerarse suficiente para establecer que un nombre de dominio es idéntico o similar en grado de confusión a una marca registrada. ...
2009-10-02 - Case Details
DES2011-0017, en las que quedan de manifiesto los elementos de prueba aportados por los promoventes para acreditar el uso extendido, difusión y/o reconocimiento de sus marcas.
9 Respecto a esos elementos véase la sección 3.2 de la Sinopsis de las opiniones de los grupos de expertos de la OMPI sobre determinadas cuestiones relacionadas con la UDRP, segunda edición (WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, -“WIPO Overview 2.0”) disponible en “www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview2.0/index.html”.
10 En Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Sony Corporation v. Heinz Windheim,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2012-11-06 - Case Details
此外，顶级域名如".com"与".net"在判断争议域名是否与注册商标相同或混淆性近似可不予考虑（GA Modefine SA 诉 Yonghui Huang，WIPO 案件编号D2008-0355；Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) 诉 Inja Kil，WIPO 案件编号 D2000-1409；Florida Department of Management Serives诉Anthony Gorss (or AGCS)，WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1194）。
...
2017-12-06 - Case Details
It is well accepted in cases under the Policy that the addition of one or more generic or descriptive terms to a trademark is insufficient to avoid a finding of confusing similarity in that it cannot remove the overall impression made on the public by the trademark which is the dominant part of the domain name (see, for example, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 and the discussion relative to the domain names and in Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (“BMW”) v. ...
2018-11-30 - Case Details
通用顶级域名如“.com”与 “.net”，在判断争议域名是否与注册商标相同或混淆性近似可不予考虑（GA Modefine SA 诉 Yonghui Huang, WIPO 案件编号D2008-0355；Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) 诉 Inja Kil, WIPO 案件编号 D2000-1409；Florida Department of Management Serives诉Anthony Gorss (or AGCS) , WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1194）；Cube Limited 诉 Super Privacy Service c/o Dynadot, WIPO案件编号 D2016-1153。
...
2019-01-02 - Case Details
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Once a complainant establishes that a respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a complainant's mark, and has made a prima facie case that respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, the burden shifts to respondent to establish some rights or legitimate interest with respect to the domain name. See Sony Kabushiki kaisha v. sony.net,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1074. The Panel, noting that Complainant has not authorized Respondents to use the LEGO marks, finds that Complainant has made such a prima facie case, in which Respondents have not answered.
...
2010-03-11 - Case Details
The Panel recognizes that in numerous proceedings, a distinctive mark in its entirety which is incorporated in a domain name has been found to render the domain name confusingly similar to the distinctive mark in question (inter alia, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. JonLR,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0428; Sony Corporation v. Park Kwangsoo,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0167).
In Nicole Kidman v. John Zuccarini, d/b/a Cupcake Party,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-01-15 - Case Details
D2003-0455; Belupo d.d. v. WACHEM d.o.o.,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0110; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. sony.net,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1074; The Vanguard Group, Inc. v. Lorna Kang,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-10-20 - Case Details
Such constructive notice suggests that the Respondent acted with opportunistic bad faith in registering the disputed domain name. See e.g., Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sin, Eonmok,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1007, Nintendo of Am. Inc. v. Pokemon,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-05-31 - Case Details
This company can be characterized as a cyber squatter which follows from a number of UDRP decisions, such as in Sony Corporation v. Privacy Ltd. Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0794 (concerning the domain name ), Revlon Consumer Products Corporation v. ...
2016-10-25 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar
A registered trademark provides a clear indication that the rights in the mark shown on the trademark
certificate belong to its respective owner. Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited v. Host Master,
1337 Services LLC, WIPO Case No. DIO2020-0013. ...
2022-06-30 - Case Details
Although the Panel may draw appropriate inferences f rom the Respondent’s
default, paragraph 4 of the Policy requires the Complainant to support its assertions with actual evidence in
1 As the criteria under the .IO Policy are similar to the criteria under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), the
Panel considers that the principles as developed under the UDRP (notably including the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on
Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition, (“WIPO Overview 3.0”)) may be applied where appropriate under the .IO Policy (e.g., Sony
Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited v. Host Master, 1337 Services LLC, WIPO Case No. DIO2020-0013).
...
2025-06-30 - Case Details
The logos and brands of other manufacturers such as APPLE, ASUS, ACER, and SONY are displayed. By clicking a logo, one is led to another website advertising the repair and maintenance services for products bearing the corresponding logo.
...
2018-12-18 - Case Details
D2000-0441);
and a number of other generic words (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409).
6.5. The Administrative Panel finds on the facts that the disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to trademarks in which Complainant has rights in terms of Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2001-09-25 - Case Details
A similar issue was raised in case D2000-1838, Celine Dion and Sony Music Entertainment (Canada) Inc. v Jeff Burger. The Panel in this case agrees with the Panel in that case that such an issue does not override a finding of registration and use in bad faith.
7. ...
2001-04-05 - Case Details