About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 897   document(s)s (0.025 sec)

Rows

<<  <  481 - 500  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1367 for fivenightsat.com, fivenightsatfreddys-fnaf.com, fivenightsatfreddysaz.com, fivenightsatfreddysfull.com, fnaf-4.com, fnafworldaz.com html (53 KB)

In this regard, the Panel, similar to previous UDRP decision, finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks because it incorporates both of the Complainant’s marks in their entirety and the addition of a hyphen is insufficient to distinguish the Disputed Domain Name from the Complainant’s marks (see, e.g., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Sony Corporation v. Aylin Dzhelilova, WIPO Case No. ...It is well established that the addition of a number and/or a hyphen after a distinctive trademark does not prevent confusing similarity, thus, in the Panel’s view, the addition of the said number and hyphen does nothing to distinguish the Disputed Domain Name from the FNAF trademark, nor to dispel confusing similarity, as it was found in previous UDRP decisions (see, e.g., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Sony Corporation v. Aylin Dzhelilova, supra; NXP B.V. v. xu jie, guang zhou ye ma dian zi ke ji you xian gong si, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-09-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DES2006-0009 for nike-philips.es, nikebasketball.es, nikebiz.es, nikecycling.es, nikegolf.es, nikeid.es, nikeplay.es, nikerunning.es, niketown.es html (25 KB)

En casos semejantes al presente estas actuaciones, consistentes en registrar de forma indiscriminada nombres de dominio iguales o semejantes a marcas famosas ajenas, han sido calificadas como “patrón de conducta” indicativo de mala fe (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Inja, Kil, Caso OMPI D2000-1409). Por todo ello, la Experta considera que también se cumple la tercera de las condiciones previstas por el Reglamento. 6.3.D Pretensión de la Demandante La Demandante solicita la cancelación del nombre de dominio , lo cual es aceptado por la Experta, dado que dicho nombre de dominio incluye una marca que no le pertenece, por lo que la transferencia solicitada para los restantes nombres de dominio no es posible en este caso, salvo si hubiese sido expresamente consentido por el legítimo titular de los derechos de la marca PHILIPS. ...

2006-09-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0093 for polousa.com html (23 KB)

Indeed it is difficult to imagine a use of Complainant’s marks, given their distinction and famous nature, that would not suggest an affiliation of some sort with Complainant. See Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409. 6.22 At the very least, Respondent’s website creates an initial interest confusion that smacks of opportunistic bad faith. ...

2006-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-1340 for musicload.cc, wwwmusicload.com html (23 KB)

As to the domain name the Panel concurs with the views expressed in Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, that “It is inconceivable that the Respondent could make any active use of the disputed domain name without creating a false impression of association with the Complainant. ...

2006-05-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0107 for 4pointsheraton.com, fourpointsheratonhotel.com, sheratinhotel.com, sheratonaddis.com, sheratonboston.com, sheratonbuganvilias.com, sheratoncrossroads.com, sheratoncrossroadshote.com, sheratondoha.com, sheratongateway.com, sheratongrand.com, sheratonhacienda.com ... html (36 KB)

This is even more so in the case of hotels.’); see also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 at § 6 (WIPO Dec. 9, 2000) (‘Neither the addition of an ordinary descriptive word . . . nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY,’ and thus Policy ¶ 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2007-05-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0622 for savecisra.com html (22 KB)

D2005-0037, Philip Morris USA Inc. v. n/a, WIPO Case No. D2004-0462, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). Therefore, this Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s CISRA trademark. ...

2011-06-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DPH2011-0001 for skype.ph html (21 KB)

According to the Complainant, the website screen captures on August 4 and November 17, 2010, show that the content of the website at the disputed domain name address consisted of targeted commercial links to third parties, identified as VOIP phone, Internet telephone and many others listed herein which indicate that the Respondent clearly targets the field of activities of the Complainant and its competitors and that such targeted commercial links cannot conceivably suggest a bone fide offering of goods or services. See e.g., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB v. PD Hosting Inc., WIPO Case No. DPH2006-0001. Finally, according to the Complainant, there is nothing to suggest that the Respondent has made any legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name which points to a website consisting of a parking page on which the Internet visitors will find many targeted links to third party commercial websites including the activities of the Complainant and its competitors and from which the Respondent is undoubtedly earning revenue via click-through links resulting from the confusion between the disputed domain name and the Trademark SKYPE of the Complainant. ...The Panel agrees with the views stated by the panel in the UDRP decision Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, supra, which held that the presence and use of such commercial links cannot conceivably suggest a bona fide offer of goods and services which finding this Panel agrees with and adopts. ...

2011-06-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1297 for zema.com html (24 KB)

D2000-0493, Rollerblade, Inc. v. Chris McCrady, WIPO Case No. D2000-0429 and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). Respondent argues that there are other ZEMA trademarks registered by third parties in the US, and alleges that based on this fact Complainant's rights are not exclusive. ...

2008-11-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1120 for valiumrx.com html (24 KB)

D2000-0493, Rollerblade, Inc. v. Chris McCrady, WIPO Case No. D2000-0429 and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). The first requirement of the Policy has been met. ...

2008-09-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0075 for newlancome.com, newloreal.com html (23 KB)

El uso como prefijo de la genérica palabra “new” en ambos nombres de dominio es irrelevante, y no alcanza a distinguirlos de las marcas de las Demandantes. Ver Sony Corporation c. Park Kwangsoo, Caso OMPI No. D2001-0167 (estableciendo que es confundiblemente similar a la marca SONY); ver también Yahoo! ...

2008-06-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0683 for bestjackpotcity.com html (21 KB)

A descriptive element cannot remove the overall impression made on the public by a trademark which is the dominant part of the domain name (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). In these circumstances, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and thus that the first element under the Policy has been established. ...

2011-07-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1338 for hklancome.com html (21 KB)

Further, it is well-established that in considering whether a disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark, the Top-Level Domain (for example, “.com” and “.net”) may be disregarded (GA Modefine SA v. Yonghui Huang, WIPO Case No. D2008-0355; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409; Florida Department of Management Services v. ...

2013-10-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-2058 for neillaneengagementrings.net, neillaneengagementrings.org html (22 KB)

D2000-0641, where the selection of domain names is so obviously connected to the complainant’s trademark their very use by someone with no connection with the company suggests opportunistic bad faith. Similarly, in Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, where the respondent registered a number of domain names incorporating a well-known trademark in its entirety, the panel stated, ‘that it is inconceivable that the respondent could make any active use of the disputed domain names without creating a false impression of association with the complainant’.” ...

2012-01-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-2176 for chevyextendedwarranty.com html (21 KB)

In such a circumstance, this combination of the words "chevyextendedwarranty" is confusingly similar to the mark CHEVY. As stated by the Panel in Sony Kabushuki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, “neither the addition of an ordinary descriptive word nor the suffix“.com” detracts from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name, namely the trademark SONY”. ...

2012-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0190 for legobatmanwalkthroughxbox360.com html (20 KB)

Javier Garcia Quintas and Christiandior.net, WIPO Case No. D2000-0226, and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409.” Taking in to account the above, added to the absence of participation in the proceeding of the Respondent, it is the Panel’s view that the Respondent’s registration was made with knowledge of the Complainant’s mark, which further supports a finding of bad faith registration. ...

2012-04-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1900 for valiumsale.com html (20 KB)

It is well established in prior UDRP decisions that such confusion, and the resultant misdirection of Internet traffic, is independently sufficient to establish bad faith. See e.g. Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications International AB, Telefonaktiebloaget LM Ericsson, Sony Corporation v. ...

2012-12-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0522 for calzedonna.com html (21 KB)

Lythion Services Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2006-0035; Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications International AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Sony Corporation v. ...

2012-06-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0444 for tetris-built.com html (21 KB)

Numerous previous cases under the Policy have found that where a trademark is incorporated in its entirety within a domain name, the addition of a generic word will generally not distinguish that domain name from the trademark (see, for example, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). In the Panel’s assessment, the dominant part of the disputed domain name is the Complainant’s trademark and not the word “built”. ...

2012-05-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0185 for betvictorlivecasino.com html (20 KB)

A descriptive element cannot remove the overall impression made on the public by a trademark which is the dominant part of the domain name (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). In addition, the Panel notes that the words “live” and “casino”, taken as a phrase, are used in the Complainants’ website URL and are descriptive of the services provided by the Complainants, such that this exacerbates the confusion between the disputed domain name and the First Complainant’s trademark. ...

2013-03-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2546 for kinder-chocolate.com html (21 KB)

D2011-1426, and the decision cited by the Complainant Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409. The top level domain “.com” is required only for technical reasons and may be disregarded. ...

2013-02-26 - Case Details