Resulta suficiente que dicho titular, su empresa u organización sea genuinamente
conocido por dicha denominación, circunstancia que puede demostrarse, entre otros elementos, mediante
documentos constitutivos. Véase Sony Kabushiki Kaisha aka Sony Corporation v. Sony Holland, Caso
OMPI No. D2008-1025.
La Promovente invoca la decisión E.ON SE v. ...
2026-08-05 - Case Details
Domain Protection Services Inc. / My Mo, WIPO Case No. D2022-0825; Sony Kabushiki
Kaisha v. Sin, Eonmok, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...See Frankie Shop LLC v. Bgeew Aferg, supra; see also Sony
Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sin, Eonmok, supra.
As discussed in detail in Section 6.B above, Complainant shows in evidence in the Annexes to its Complaint
that Respondent has used the disputed domain name to configure a copycat website to impersonate
Complainant to attract Internet users seeking Complainant’s products through possibly counterfeit products
for Respondent’s own commercial gain, which constitutes evidence of bad faith under the well-established
principles in the cases decided under the Policy. ...
2026-07-16 - Case Details
D2000-0837
(, and
confusingly similar to CARREFOUR trademark); Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also
trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1409 (domain names such as , ,
, , and are
confusingly similar to SONY trademark); and Dell Computer Corporation v.
...
2005-10-18 - Case Details
Diabetes Home Care, Inc. and DHC Services, WIPO
Case No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation)
v. Kil Inja, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409;
and America Online, Inc. v. ...D2000-0493, Rollerblade,
Inc. v. McCrady, WIPO Case No. D2000-0429
and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Kil, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1409).
Following VeriSign, Inc. v. Onlinemalls, WIPO
Case No. ...
2005-08-01 - Case Details
Diabetes Home Care, Inc.
and DHC Services, WIPO Case No. D2001-0174;
Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja,
Caso WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 and America
Online, Inc. v. ...D2000-0493, Rollerblade, Inc. v. Chris McCrady, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0429 and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1409).
In view of the above, this Panel concludes that the disputed domain names , and are confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark TUDOR. ...
2005-09-29 - Case Details
The Panel finds that including a dictionary word to a disputed domain name consisting of a complainant's trademark in its entirety does nothing to alleviate the 1confusing similarity.”
- Sony Corporation v Domain Privacy Service and St. Kitts Registry,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0795 in relation to the domain name where it was held that “the disputed domain name contains the Complainant's SONY trade mark in its entirety. ...The addition of this word is not enough to distinguish the disputed domain name from the Complainant's trade mark, and accordingly the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trade mark SONY”
- Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Gray West International,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1219 where the panel stated that “the more unique and inherently distinctive the mark, the stronger it is, and the greater the likelihood that the public may confuse a similar mark...
2010-07-19 - Case Details
D2000-0493; Rollerblade, Inc. v. Chris McCrady,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0429 and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409).
Similarly, the disputed domain name is also confusingly similar to Complainant's trademarks INTESA TRADE and INTESA TRADE & design The only variations are the substitution of the term “trade” for the term “trading”, and the addition of the genric top-level domain (gTLD) “.com”.
...
2009-04-23 - Case Details
As
noted in the Complaint, prior panels operating within the scope of the Policy
have found that the addition of this word to a mark tends only to focus attention
on that mark, thereby creating even more confusion for an Internet user. See
Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Sin,
Eonmok, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007,
where the Panel wrote: “The addition of the letters ‘my’ has
the effect of focusing the reader’s attention on the Complainant’s
trademark. ...
2006-09-14 - Case Details
Diabetes Home care and DHC services,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki
Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1409; America Online Inc v. ...
2006-09-12 - Case Details
D2001-0026 (March 23, 2001), (finding confusing similarity where the
domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the complainant combined
with a generic word or term); see also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (December 9,
2000), (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive
word… nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression
of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY”
and thus the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied).”
...
2006-07-31 - Case Details
D2001-0026 (March 23, 2001), (finding confusing similarity where the
domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the complainant combined
with a generic word or term); see also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (December 9,
2000), (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive
word… nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression
of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY”
and thus the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied).”
...
2006-07-31 - Case Details
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Once a complainant establishes that a respondent’s domain name is identical
or confusingly similar to a complainant’s mark, and that the complainant
has not authorized the respondent to use the mark, the burden shifts to the
respondent to establish some right or legitimate interest in respect of the
domain name. Sony Kabushiki Kaisha a/t/a Sony Corporation v. Sony.net, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1074.
The Respondent appears to have a legitimate business, although it has not come
forward with any more proof than what can be concluded based on its website.
...
2006-05-31 - Case Details
“The addition
of ‘my’ is not sufficient to avoid confusion.” Sony Kabushiki
Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Sin, Eonmok, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1007).
The Panel finds that the domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2006-11-03 - Case Details
The addition of a
generic or descriptive term to an established mark fails to distinguish the
resulting domain name from the mark or dispel the resulting confusion. Sony
Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1409.
The panel in F. ...
2006-10-31 - Case Details
Javier Garcia Quintas and Christiandior.net, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0226 and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation
v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409,
where it was stated that “It is inconceivable that the Respondent could
make any active use of the disputed domain name without creating a false impression
of association with the Complainant. ...
2006-04-19 - Case Details
Pepsi SRL (a/k/a P.E.P.S.I) and EMS COMPUTER INDUSTRY (a/k/a EMS),
WIPO Case No. D2003-0696; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409).
Further, in cases with domain names composed of a trademark and descriptive words such as “online-prescription” or “prescription”, previous panelists have ordered the transfer of these domain names to the Complainant (see Sanofi-Aventis, Aventis Inc. v. ...
2009-02-12 - Case Details
D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the Complainant combined with a generic word or term); See also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word...nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, Paragraph4(a)(i) is satisfied).
...
2007-06-15 - Case Details
Diabetes Home Care, Inc. and DHC
Services, WIPO Case No. D2001-0174;
Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409; America Online,
Inc. v. ...
2007-01-15 - Case Details
The descriptive and generic elements do not take away the overall impression the dominant part of the domain name, being the Trademark, makes on the public (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1409; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ...
2010-03-04 - Case Details
Este Experto considera que el uso del nombre de dominio por parte del Titular ha creado la falsa impresión de asociación con la Promovente. (Ver mutatis mutandi, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, Caso OMPI D2000-1409). Y por lo tanto, el nombre de dominio en cuestión fue registrado y es usado de mala fe.
...
2011-03-14 - Case Details