About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 62852   document(s)s (0.132 sec)

Rows

<<  <  45081 - 45100  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1144 for electrolux-wh.com html (15 KB)

The Respondent is Zhang Wei Bing, nan jing jia dian wei xiu zhong xin of Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name ("Disputed Domain Name") is registered with Foshan YiDong Network Co., LTD (the "Registrar"). 3. ...The Respondent was aware of the ELECTROLUX Mark prior to acquiring the Disputed Domain Name and establishing the website; and (c) The Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2016-08-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0083 for pfizer-viagra.com html (17 KB)

The Respondent is Mmyongjin Kim, Gyeongju Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed Domain Name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.   3. ...The Domain Name in dispute, which was registered by the Respondent, is confusingly similar to the trademarks of the Complainant; and, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name in dispute; and, the Respondent’s Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2005-06-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-0715 for lorespressoes.com pdf (151 KB)

The Respondent is GuiZi Guo, Hong Kong, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Realtime Register B.V. ...ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Koninklijke Douwe Egberts B.V. v. GuiZi Guo Case No. D2026-0715 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2026-04-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1252 for luluandgeorgia.shop pdf (161 KB)

The Respondent is asfa, sfa, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The LULU & GEORGIA mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-05-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3269 for warframemerch.com pdf (145 KB)

The Respondent is Piyush Roy, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-10-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-4059 for caffetin.com pdf (160 KB)

The Respondent is Admin, Republic of Korea. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Gabia, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-12-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1287 for preventchildabusetexas.org html (13 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar 2.1 The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...When the Domain Name lapsed it was acquired by the Respondent. Thereafter, it was initially used for a website that in large part replicated the website that the Complainant’s Texas chapter had operated from the Domain Name. ...

2019-08-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4714 for dripdroppro.com pdf (142 KB)

The Respondent is Drip Drop, Pakistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...Moreover, there is no evidence that the Respondent has been commonly known by the disputed domain name; and (iv) The Respondent has registered the disputed domain name in bad faith. The disputed domain name resolves to a parked Shopify website. ...

2026-01-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIE2025-0010 for maryliq.ie pdf (148 KB)

The Respondent is Daniel Adamik, Ireland. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with IE Domain Registry Limited (“IEDR or the “Registry””). 3. ...The entirety of the MARYLIQ mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the IEDR Policy. ...

2026-05-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-1896 for theodonil.com pdf (171 KB)

Respondent is 李策平 (li ce ping), China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina (www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. page 3 Complainant requests that the disputed domain name be transferred to it. ...

2026-08-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4399 for sennheiser-hearings.com pdf (146 KB)

The Respondent is Jesse Pinkman, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Cosmotown, Inc. ...KG v. Jesse Pinkman Case No. D2023-4399 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 5. ...

2023-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2034 for canvavina.tech pdf (145 KB)

The Respondent is miracleellis, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dotserve Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2022-09-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3053 for heetssatis.com pdf (234 KB)

The Respondent is Redacted for privacy, Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Taha Cevher Beydilli, Netobil Medya, Türkiye. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark since the Mark is recognisable within the disputed domain name. ...

2022-10-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1809 for allsaints.vip html (18 KB)

The Respondent is Wang Ya Ya of Huai Hua, Hu Nan, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...See Taylor Wimpey PLC, Taylor Wimpey Holdings Limited v. honghao Internet foshan co, ltd, WIPO Case No. D2013-0974) There is no evidence suggesting that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name or that it has any rights in the name “All Saints”. ...

2016-11-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1611 for zarafranchise.com html (16 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...According to the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name given that: (i) the use of the disputed domain name to impersonate the Complainant for fraudulent purposes and to target the Complainant's prospective franchisees and third parties under false pretenses does not characterize a legitimate use or a bona fide offering of goods and services; (ii) the Complainant has not licensed or authorized the Respondent to represent it, nor has he been authorized to register the disputed domain name or develop any activity under the ZARA trademark; (iii) there is no evidence that the Respondent is the holder of any trademark or any registered name that may legitimate him to register and use the disputed domain name; (iv) given the overwhelming renown and popularity of the ZARA trademark worldwide it is not conceivable that the Respondent could possibly establish any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name (as in Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...

2018-09-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-0913 for 德高商标.com pdf (176 KB)

Respondent is 张德高 (De Gao Zhang), China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <德高商标.com> () is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. Complainant requests that the disputed domain name be transferred to it. ...

2026-05-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-1234 for parabootsbelgium.com pdf (146 KB)

The Respondent is Eisenhower Hofmann, Germany. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2026-05-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-1345 for aminamuaddistyle.shop pdf (160 KB)

The Respondent is kayleighs kayleighs, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.1/ https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.1/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION AMINA CORP v. kayleighs kayleighs Case No. D2026-1345 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2026-05-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3140 for zynaus.com pdf (144 KB)

The Respondent is Courtney Turner, Comt, Australia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...It is evident from the Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name that the Respondent knew of the Complainant’s ZYN trademark when registering the disputed domain name. ...

2025-10-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCC2024-0038 for eqniuoro.cc pdf (146 KB)

The Respondent is Sophia, Sophia, United States of America (“US”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dominet (HK) Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Therefore, the EQUINOR trademark remains clearly recognizable in the disputed domain name. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and registered the disputed domain name years after the Complainant’s announcement of its name change and global rollout of page 3 the EQUINOR mark. ...

2025-03-07 - Case Details